x404.co.uk http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/ |
|
She's in labour http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=19476 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | oceanicitl [ Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:00 am ] |
Post subject: | She's in labour |
I'm sure you all know who I'm talking about |
Author: | Spreadie [ Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:09 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: She's in labour | |||||||||
Yes, but I don't care. I wish her well, as I would any new mother, but I don't care one iota about an addition to the royal family. Now, if you'll excuse me, I will now try to avoid all forms of media for the next... what you reckon, fortnight? Month? Decade? |
Author: | jonbwfc [ Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: She's in labour |
Note to all American reporters : It's laboUr |
Author: | HeatherKay [ Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: She's in labour |
*considers locking and deleting this thread due to widespread disinterest* ![]() |
Author: | paulzolo [ Mon Jul 22, 2013 9:12 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: She's in labour | |||||||||
Please Do. A YouGov survey showed that only 14% of people in the UK were “very interested”. Total not interested: 53%. http://cdn.yougov.com/cumulus_uploads/d ... arents.pdf In fact, a higher percentage of people in India are interested than in the UK. http://yougov.co.uk/news/2013/07/16/ind ... oyal-baby/ |
Author: | jonbwfc [ Mon Jul 22, 2013 9:17 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: She's in labour | |||||||||
The Guardian have instituted a 'republican' button on their home page. if you click it, it saves a cookie which means that the site doesn't show you any royal baby news. best headline so far? 'On Her Majesty's Secret Cervix' |
Author: | Amnesia10 [ Mon Jul 22, 2013 9:18 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: She's in labour | |||||||||
Would not bother me either way. Can I admit I am disinterested as well? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk. |
Author: | oceanicitl [ Mon Jul 22, 2013 12:32 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: She's in labour | |||||||||
Please do |
Author: | paulzolo [ Mon Jul 22, 2013 1:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: She's in labour |
I am hoping that when she's done with Labour, she'll join Socialist Worker. |
Author: | Amnesia10 [ Mon Jul 22, 2013 1:40 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: She's in labour | |||||||||
![]() Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk. |
Author: | John_Vella [ Mon Jul 22, 2013 7:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: She's in labour |
And now we know. It's a boy. Can we please get on with our lives now? Thanks! Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 4 Beta |
Author: | rustybucket [ Mon Jul 22, 2013 7:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: She's in labour |
To those of you forced by your otherwise-intelligent spouses to endure royal baby-related drivel, I heartily recommend a Whitenoise generator |
Author: | oceanicitl [ Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: She's in labour |
It's a baby. Hoorah! *yawns* |
Author: | Amnesia10 [ Mon Jul 22, 2013 9:00 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: She's in labour | |||||||||
So how different from normal is that? ![]() |
Author: | ProfessorF [ Mon Jul 22, 2013 9:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: She's in labour |
Royal Baby Eats First Meal |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |