Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Conservatives 'considering ways to raise minimum wage' 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23934721

It wouldn't hurt their re-election chances ;)

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:16 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Their policy was to let the minimum wage "whither on the vine" in their own words.

Quote:
The independent think tank the Institute for Fiscal Studies has calculated that for every pound spent paying the so-called Living Wage, which is currently set at £7.45 per hour for those working outside of London, £8.55 per hour for those inside London; the Treasury saves 50p through not needing to pay tax credits and benefits.

They should make the living wage mandatory for big employers and block any company that does not pay the living wage ineligible for government contracts.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Sep 02, 2013 9:30 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 1:03 pm
Posts: 5041
Location: London
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
Their policy was to let the minimum wage "whither on the vine" in their own words.

Quote:
The independent think tank the Institute for Fiscal Studies has calculated that for every pound spent paying the so-called Living Wage, which is currently set at £7.45 per hour for those working outside of London, £8.55 per hour for those inside London; the Treasury saves 50p through not needing to pay tax credits and benefits.

They should make the living wage mandatory for big employers and block any company that does not pay the living wage ineligible for government contracts.

Totally agree - and have it that any sub contractors that they use also pay the living wage so that a firm cant sub contract out their liability

_________________
John_Vella wrote:
OK, so all we need to do is find a half African, half Chinese, half Asian, gay, one eyed, wheelchair bound dwarf with tourettes and a lisp, and a st st stutter and we could make the best panel show ever.


Tue Sep 03, 2013 8:45 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
Forget the minimum wage, it's zero hour contarcts they need to get rid of. How are people supposed to live like that? You can't even plan based on what you expect to earn as you have no idea what you're getting.
Failing that I'd limit companies to 1 or 2 percent of their employees being on zero hour contracts.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Tue Sep 03, 2013 8:50 am
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
hifidelity2 wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
Their policy was to let the minimum wage "whither on the vine" in their own words.

Quote:
The independent think tank the Institute for Fiscal Studies has calculated that for every pound spent paying the so-called Living Wage, which is currently set at £7.45 per hour for those working outside of London, £8.55 per hour for those inside London; the Treasury saves 50p through not needing to pay tax credits and benefits.

They should make the living wage mandatory for big employers and block any company that does not pay the living wage ineligible for government contracts.

Totally agree - and have it that any sub contractors that they use also pay the living wage so that a firm cant sub contract out their liability

There could be a new BS standard number to comply. If the government are truly committed to the concept of making work pay they need to make sure that working means no more reliance on in work benefits. That way potential employees will see that they will be better off by working.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Sep 03, 2013 8:57 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
Forget the minimum wage, it's xero hour contarcts they ned to get rid of. How are people supposed to live like that? You can't even plan based on what you expect to earn as you have no idea what you're getting.
Failing that I'd limit companies to 1 or 2 percent of their employees being on zero hour contracts.

When I first did part time bar work I was on the equivalent of a zero hours contract, I would get notified of my shifts the week before so I could plan ahead. Though they were not as bad as Todays zero hours contracts I did get regular shifts and could get a night off if necessary without the risk of getting the sack. I cannot see how anyone can cope with todays contracts. They might give the company flexibility but they are also a way to avoid employee benefits such as sick pay or holiday rights.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:02 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 6 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.