Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Species Diversity Not Caused By Environment 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
Quote:
Species Diversity Not Caused By Environment
By Annalee Newitz, 2:31 PM on Fri Jul 17 2009, 11,274 views

Accepted scientific wisdom holds that new species arise because of geographic separation - the same bird evolves differently on two different islands. But a new study overturns this idea, challenging the importance of environment as a driver of evolution.

Published this week in Nature, the new study shows that even when a group of creatures is not separated by mountain ranges, and isn't forced to find a niche in the ecosystem via natural selection, new species will evolve over hundreds of generations. The researchers created a mathematical model of speciation, when one species evolves into many, which tracks emergence of species over 2,000 generations. The model was based on scientific observation of how new species have evolved all over the Earth.


Above, you can see the model, showing how species transform over time. Each color represents a species. What begins as a uniform single-color group slowly evolves into several distinct species. But this occurs via mutation and sexual selection, not from the creatures growing distant from each other geographically. And not from competing for different niches in the environment. In this model, there are no niches and no geographical boundaries.

So what's the big deal? In short, it means that new species can arise without competion for environmental resources. Sexual selection alone is enough to produce species diversity.

According to the New England Complex Systems Institute, which funded the study:

The study found that over generations the genetic distance between organisms in different regions increases, and groups of organisms spontaneously form groups that can no longer mate, causing a patchwork of species across the area. The number of species increases rapidly until it reaches a relatively steady state.
"One can think about the creation of species on the genetic level in the same way we think about the appearance of many patterns, including traffic jams," said [researcher] Yaneer Bar-Yam. "While the spatial environment may vary, specific physical barriers aren't necessary. Just as traffic jams can form from the flow of traffic itself without an accident, the formation of many species can occur as generations evolve across the organisms' spatial habitat."

The study authors are not claiming that enviroment is unimportant. They are simply saying that under some circumstances, it is not a necessary ingredient for evolutionary transformation.

Nevertheless, this study overturns the typical view of evolution. It turns out that we don't need adaptation to a hostile natural environment to evolve new forms of life. We can do it just by having offspring and mutating over time.


Source

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Fri Jul 31, 2009 5:31 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 119
Location: West Wales
Reply with quote
Very interesting article.

I'm not altogether sure that its quite as "radical" as the headline might have us believe. Although "natural selection" focuses on the idea of adaptation to the environment as a driver for species change, I don't think it excludes general genetic "drift". Background radiation, for example, seems to be sufficient to shuffle a species's genes in an arbitrary way, environmental chemicals etc etc probably do too.
Most people (loonies aside) now accept that evolution ocurrs, and degrees of genetic diversity within a species are an inherent component of how evolution works. Some minor trait that appears insignificant in a steady-state context might mean that a particular genetic variant becomes much more sucessful than its fellows should things change. Similarly should migration or geographic movement take place then particular sub-species will become more sucessful. So it is a pre-requisite of evolution of "natural selection" too that some degree of genetic diversity pre-dates significant speciation or other changes.


Sat Aug 01, 2009 7:03 am
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 12:52 pm
Posts: 266
Location: Truro
Reply with quote
Interesting as it is, it's pretty obvious that not all evolution is in direct response to an emerging environment change, especially in something as relatively innocuous as colouration.

By sopme random mutation, I grow taller and pass this gene onto my offspring. Because we're taller, we can no longer live in caves like my stunted relatives and have to live on the plains. Both groups continue and thrive; my decscendants live off grasses and root crops, the cave dwellers live off bat guano and moss :twisted:

After many generations of co-existance, a flood wipes out the tall people, leaving those in caves to carry on producing offspring. But for the chance event of a huge flood, mankind could have evolved taller. Showing how evolution is not initially driven by circumstance, but will be affected by it in the long run. Both ways work, it doesn't have to be one or the other.

_________________
Image
www.TunedGaming.co.uk - CS:S, COD4 and PS3 clan!


My Flickr
WWFSMD?


Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:31 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
Quote:
Sexual selection alone is enough to produce species diversity.

Err, I thought that was already the established thought :|

Obviously, selection is influenced by factors such as the environment. However, if the environment is highly fertile then many distinct species evolve. All those pretty birds you get in tropical paradises evolved purely because the pretty ones are more likely get a shag, and having a stupid flashy tail isn't much of a disadvantage when there are no predators.

Introduce a predator, and suddenly the boring brown birds get a huge advantage over the flash idiots who can barely fly.

When times are hard, species die. When times are good, they diversify. You even see it in humans over relatively short time scales.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Sun Aug 02, 2009 1:04 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 4 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.