x404.co.uk http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/ |
|
Fox: 'Wasteful' NHS should not have funding ringfenced http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=20939 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | pcernie [ Thu Jan 02, 2014 5:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Fox: 'Wasteful' NHS should not have funding ringfenced |
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014 ... ringfenced Yes, Liam's been licking arse recently... |
Author: | Amnesia10 [ Thu Jan 02, 2014 5:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fox: 'Wasteful' NHS should not have funding ringfenced |
I wonder how our doctor in the forums will agree with that that assessment? |
Author: | cloaked_wolf [ Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fox: 'Wasteful' NHS should not have funding ringfenced |
Easy. He is a muppet. IiRC we spend less of our GDP than most other comparable countries on the NHS. The problem is the ring fencing applies to only certain aspects. We need more money but in the right areas, not the wrong areas. The NHS is already having cuts made. Sounds like he just wants everything to collapse further. Re: cancer outcomes. IIRC the data, the UK only lags at initial detection. Some of this is down to delayed presentation so the recent adverts targeted at bladder/lung/bowel cancer should help. |
Author: | MrStevenRogers [ Thu Jan 02, 2014 11:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fox: 'Wasteful' NHS should not have funding ringfenced |
the wrong area(s) of NHS funding is, the 'management' ... |
Author: | ShockWaffle [ Fri Jan 03, 2014 1:14 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Fox: 'Wasteful' NHS should not have funding ringfenced | |||||||||
Correct, very few advanced economies get what we do for noticeably less, and the most productive nations are largely to the left of us on this chart. Which clearly suggests that rather than ring fencing against decreases, it is a worthy sector for more cash. ![]() It might be more accurate to say that others have tested to destruction the idea that throwing money into the pit can ever fill it, because we certainly haven't. The idea we seem intent on testing is that an endless series of restructurings can fix it. A sensible technocratic overhaul is doubtless in order, but politicians with an electoral cycle to worry about can't afford the necessary patience. |
Author: | Amnesia10 [ Fri Jan 03, 2014 4:21 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Fox: 'Wasteful' NHS should not have funding ringfenced | |||||||||
Yes you could blame Thatcher for bringing in thousands of them. ![]() |
Author: | l3v1ck [ Fri Jan 03, 2014 6:59 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Fox: 'Wasteful' NHS should not have funding ringfenced | ||||||||||||||||||
Or the others who've had almost a quarter of a centuary to change it since she left. |
Author: | bobbdobbs [ Fri Jan 03, 2014 7:25 pm ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Fox: 'Wasteful' NHS should not have funding ringfenced | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
that was in 2010, so i dont think Thatcher can be held responsible for hirings after she had left office |
Author: | Amnesia10 [ Sat Jan 04, 2014 1:57 pm ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Fox: 'Wasteful' NHS should not have funding ringfenced | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes but New Labour were closet Tories anyway, so there was no change in policy likely. They also brought in a target culture which the Tories wanted anyway. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |