x404.co.uk http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/ |
|
Cameron: Public spending savings could fund lower taxes http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=21484 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | paulzolo [ Tue Mar 04, 2014 1:58 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Cameron: Public spending savings could fund lower taxes | |||||||||
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26427370 One wonders if there is a general election on the horizon. Well, actually, we know there is. And so does Dave. |
Author: | l3v1ck [ Tue Mar 04, 2014 2:01 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Cameron: Public spending savings could fund lower taxes | |||||||||
I'm not convinced tax cuts are the best option at the moment. |
Author: | jonbwfc [ Tue Mar 04, 2014 2:28 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Cameron: Public spending savings could fund lower taxes | ||||||||||||||||||
Yet, strangely, despite all the spending cuts his government has borrowed more money than the incompetent, wasteful labour administration they replaced. |
Author: | ShockWaffle [ Tue Mar 04, 2014 4:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Cameron: Public spending savings could fund lower taxes |
But not more than they would have had they stayed in power. Nor have they cut spending much less than Labour would have. |
Author: | Spreadie [ Tue Mar 04, 2014 8:15 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Cameron: Public spending savings could fund lower taxes | |||||||||
They did plan to invest though, rather than just cut everything to the bone, realise it isn't working (whilst claiming it's all going to plan) and then borrow money to make up for the shortfall created by stifling growth. |
Author: | Amnesia10 [ Tue Mar 04, 2014 8:43 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Cameron: Public spending savings could fund lower taxes | ||||||||||||||||||
We are still years away from eliminating the structural deficit and tax cuts might not make the situation any better. |
Author: | ShockWaffle [ Tue Mar 04, 2014 9:03 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Cameron: Public spending savings could fund lower taxes | ||||||||||||||||||
Kind of. They planned to spend money on Building Schools for the Future for instance - but that was PFI funded and sources of credit would probably have dried up without some form of bailout. What did they have on the go that wasn't PFI funded and liable to the same problem that you can recall? |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |