Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Utah lawmaker proposes firing squad executions 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/m ... -injection

Back of the head with a gun if you are going down that route?

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat May 17, 2014 5:13 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am
Posts: 1911
Reply with quote
It's very hard to find executioners for such a violent type of put down. The best candidates are surely already residents of death row.
Therefore the obvious solution is some form of televised death contest. Take everyone on death row who is scheduled for execution next year, put them all into an arena with a variety of interesting weapons, and promise that the last man standing has acccess to plenty of cocaine and hookers until next year's event.

Try to make sure the guys who are there for cocaine fuelled prostitute murer binges are at a competitive disadvantage though.


Sun May 18, 2014 12:32 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
If I was on death row I'd much prefer a quick bullet(s) to the head than a slow death by injection.
ShockWaffle wrote:
It's very hard to find executioners for such a violent type of put down.

Surely the process could be automated. It's not hard to get a machine to pull a trigger.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Sun May 18, 2014 8:25 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
If I was on death row I'd much prefer a quick bullet(s) to the head than a slow death by injection.
ShockWaffle wrote:
It's very hard to find executioners for such a violent type of put down.

Surely the process could be automated. It's not hard to get a machine to pull a trigger.


Someone is ultimately responsible for 'pulling the trigger' regardless of physical contact with the final mechanism.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sun May 18, 2014 8:59 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am
Posts: 6954
Location: Peebo
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
l3v1ck wrote:
If I was on death row I'd much prefer a quick bullet(s) to the head than a slow death by injection.
ShockWaffle wrote:
It's very hard to find executioners for such a violent type of put down.

Surely the process could be automated. It's not hard to get a machine to pull a trigger.


Someone is ultimately responsible for 'pulling the trigger' regardless of physical contact with the final mechanism.


Yes, someone is ultimately responsible however removing the physical in your face horror of pulling the actual trigger from the individual(s) reduces the psychological impact on the individual(s) performing it. Pushing a button/turning a key in a physically remote location from where the gun(s) will actually be fired insulates the executioner from the effects of they are actually dong to another human being.

_________________
When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum.
-Billy Connolly (to a heckler)


Sun May 18, 2014 9:09 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
Someone is ultimately responsible for 'pulling the trigger' regardless of physical contact with the final mechanism.
That's no different to someone currently being responsible for pushing the button that causes lethal drugs to be administered. The point is it's more remote than someone actually putting a gun to someone elses head and pulling the trigger.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Sun May 18, 2014 9:34 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
l3v1ck wrote:
If I was on death row I'd much prefer a quick bullet(s) to the head than a slow death by injection.
ShockWaffle wrote:
It's very hard to find executioners for such a violent type of put down.

Surely the process could be automated. It's not hard to get a machine to pull a trigger.


Quote:
Utah already has a tradition of execution by firing squad, with five police officers using .30-caliber Winchester rifles to execute Ronnie Lee Gardner in 2010, the last execution by rifle to be held in the state.


When Gardner was executed, I remember commentators saying that the firing squad was the most physiologically distressing option for the executioners, because it involved direct sight of the target. Even then, they arranged lighting to make it as humane as possible for the shooters.

belchingmatt wrote:
Someone is ultimately responsible for 'pulling the trigger' regardless of physical contact with the final mechanism.

I saw a documentary in the 1990s about execution. I remember a couple of things. First off, someone whose job it was to ensure that the methods of execution were as quick as possible for the prisoner saying that is was really hard to “break a human body” (I remember that phrase) to the point that it will instantly cease to function.

Secondly, they explained the really complex mechanical and legal process involved in ensuring that the person pressing the button was not directly involved with the killing. There is an almost rube goldberg mechanism which means that pressing a button may, or may not, cause the death to occur. Generally, there is more than one button, one which is randomly selected to trigger the system. The buttons must be pressed at the same time, so there is immediate confusions to who set the system off. This is analogous to the firing squad having one live round and a series of blanks in the other guns.

In the case of the lethal injection (which this programme seems dot concentrate on), there are then a series of plungers and mechanisms that eventually end up delivering the lethal cocktail of drugs, in a strict sequence so that the prisoner is anaesthetised, put to sleep, and then killed.

Usually, the people who press the buttons are homeless who are in need of cash. No names are taken, cash is paid, and they are sent on their way afterwards.

So, there is legal and physical confusion over how each execution is administered. Each execution is recorded as a murder (as it has to be legally recorded as such), but is then logged as unsolved, and it remains so. The result is that states with capital punishment tend to have a higher rate of unsolved prison murders.

I’d expect some kind of mechanical device is devised which aims a gun at point blank range - with no “wriggle” factor. A press of a button and your prisoner is put to sleep, and shot. A head shot is preferable, but knowing the USA’s fondness for open casket funerals, aiming the the heart would likely be a better choice.

Well, this is a jolly subject.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Tue May 20, 2014 12:05 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:44 pm
Posts: 4141
Location: Exeter
Reply with quote
I still don't understand why they aren't just going for nitrogen as the method of execution. There's no pain like electrocution and lethal injection, it doesn't produce any toxic substances like the gas chamber does, and undoing a valve on some gas cylinders is about as detached as the executioner can get.

_________________
"The woman is a riddle inside a mystery wrapped in an enigma I've had sex with."


Tue May 20, 2014 1:53 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 8 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.