Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
UKIP gains first elected MP 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
Quote:
The UK Independence Party has gained its first elected MP, with Douglas Carswell taking the seat of Clacton by 12,404 votes.

Mr Carswell, who defected from the Conservatives, knocked his old party - which enjoyed a 12,068 majority at the 2010 election - into second place.

UKIP leader Nigel Farage said he had "shaken up British politics".

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29549414

So, basically, Clacton has the same MP as before, but representing UKIP. Rotherham next.

Quote:
Clacton by-election: result in full
Douglas Carswell (UKIP) 21,113 (59.75%)

Giles Watling (Con) 8,709 (24.64%)

Tim Young (Lab) 3,957 (11.20%)

Chris Southall (Green) 688 (1.95%)

Andy Graham (LD) 483 (1.37%)

Bruce Sizer (Ind) 205 (0.58%)

Howling Laud Hope (Loony) 127 (0.36%)

Charlotte Rose (Ind) 56 (0.16%)

Turnout was 51%


Noting that the LibDems are now behind the Greens.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Fri Oct 10, 2014 11:39 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
UKIP are the reason Labour might win the next election.
Some Tory voters switch to UKIP in marginal seats, giving Labour victories that they probably otherwise wouldn't have had.
If UKIP want real power they should consest seats only in Labour held areas with the intention of forcing a coalition with the Tories after the election.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Fri Oct 10, 2014 12:59 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 1:03 pm
Posts: 5041
Location: London
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
UKIP are the reason Labour might win the next election.
Some Tory voters switch to UKIP in marginal seats, giving Labour victories that they probably otherwise wouldn't have had.
If UKIP want real power they should consest seats only in Labour held areas with the intention of forcing a coalition with the Tories after the election.

Given the result in Manchester Labour are in trouble to

_________________
John_Vella wrote:
OK, so all we need to do is find a half African, half Chinese, half Asian, gay, one eyed, wheelchair bound dwarf with tourettes and a lisp, and a st st stutter and we could make the best panel show ever.


Fri Oct 10, 2014 1:53 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 4860
Reply with quote
its going to be a very interesting general election ...

_________________
Hope this helps . . . Steve ...

Nothing known travels faster than light, except bad news ...
HP Pavilion 24" AiO. Ryzen7u. 32GB/1TB M2. Windows 11 Home ...


Fri Oct 10, 2014 11:04 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
hifidelity2 wrote:
l3v1ck wrote:
UKIP are the reason Labour might win the next election.
Some Tory voters switch to UKIP in marginal seats, giving Labour victories that they probably otherwise wouldn't have had.
If UKIP want real power they should consest seats only in Labour held areas with the intention of forcing a coalition with the Tories after the election.

Given the result in Manchester Labour are in trouble too.

The reporting of that one has been quite.. interesting. The fact widely stated is that labour's vote dropped by several thousand. This is true. The fact that apparently isn't being stated is that the turnout was lower by an almost exactly similar proportion, so in terms of the views of the people who bothered to vote, labour's share hardly changed at all. I was told this last night in the pub by someone who was quite a prominent member of the campaigning group of one of the other parties, so it's unlikely to be just spin.

So was this actually bad for labour? Or not? The press seemed uniformly of the opinion that it was but you could equally say that it was a case of showing that faith in our electoral system is at an all time low among supporters of all parties.

In terms of turnout, does anyone know what the state in Clacton was?


Sat Oct 11, 2014 8:00 am
Profile
Spends far too much time on here

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 4860
Reply with quote
Clacton turn out 51% a high turn out for a by election
Manchester 36% turn out about average for a by election ...

_________________
Hope this helps . . . Steve ...

Nothing known travels faster than light, except bad news ...
HP Pavilion 24" AiO. Ryzen7u. 32GB/1TB M2. Windows 11 Home ...


Sat Oct 11, 2014 10:49 am
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... act-tories

He can say and do anything he wants right now since nothing's certain.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Oct 11, 2014 6:22 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 7 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.