Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
So, banking could be about to change... 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
NatWest paves way for introduction of negative interest rates | Business | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... rest-rates

I don't even know where to start with that, but I'm sure 'lessons will be learned' :roll:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Tue Jul 26, 2016 12:02 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
And suddenly, all business accounts with NatWest transfer to different banks.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Tue Jul 26, 2016 1:27 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
If they tried this with consumer accounts, people would just move. I'm not sure if businesses can move as easily.
But I'm curious about the maths, for retail banking at least.
Let's say current free banking died a death as the banks are making no money on deposits (hopefully that won't happen), and that you had a choice of 'paid for accounts' or new free accounts with negative interest. Let's assume that there's an average of £1000 in the current account over a month (wages come in, bills go out and excess cash is moved to savings accounts)

1) Paid for account. Offers 3% interest p.a. and free cash withdrawals, but costs a £10 fee per month to run.
3% of £1000 / 12 = £2.50 interest per month, so the cost is £7.50 per month or £90 per year.

2) Free account with a -1% interest rate and free cash withdrawals.
1% of £1000 / 12 = £0.83 per month, so the cost is £10 per year.

Okay, paid for accounts have other perks, but they're often useless, so I'll ignore them.
So you'd still be better off having a negative interest account than a paid for account. Even if the negative rate was -3%, you'd still be better off.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Tue Jul 26, 2016 5:02 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 3 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.