View unanswered posts | View active topics
It is currently Tue May 13, 2025 1:04 am
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 3 posts ] |
|
So, banking could be about to change...
Author |
Message |
pcernie
Legend
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm Posts: 45931 Location: Belfast
|
NatWest paves way for introduction of negative interest rates | Business | The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... rest-ratesI don't even know where to start with that, but I'm sure 'lessons will be learned' 
_________________Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/
|
Tue Jul 26, 2016 12:02 am |
|
 |
timark_uk
Moderator
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm Posts: 12143 Location: Belfast
|
And suddenly, all business accounts with NatWest transfer to different banks.
Mark
|
Tue Jul 26, 2016 1:27 am |
|
 |
l3v1ck
What's a life?
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am Posts: 12700 Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
|

If they tried this with consumer accounts, people would just move. I'm not sure if businesses can move as easily. But I'm curious about the maths, for retail banking at least. Let's say current free banking died a death as the banks are making no money on deposits (hopefully that won't happen), and that you had a choice of 'paid for accounts' or new free accounts with negative interest. Let's assume that there's an average of £1000 in the current account over a month (wages come in, bills go out and excess cash is moved to savings accounts)
1) Paid for account. Offers 3% interest p.a. and free cash withdrawals, but costs a £10 fee per month to run. 3% of £1000 / 12 = £2.50 interest per month, so the cost is £7.50 per month or £90 per year.
2) Free account with a -1% interest rate and free cash withdrawals. 1% of £1000 / 12 = £0.83 per month, so the cost is £10 per year.
Okay, paid for accounts have other perks, but they're often useless, so I'll ignore them. So you'd still be better off having a negative interest account than a paid for account. Even if the negative rate was -3%, you'd still be better off.
|
Tue Jul 26, 2016 5:02 am |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 3 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|