Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Electoral fraud: Voters will have to show ID in pilot scheme 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38440934

I was woken up earlier than my body wanted, but that actually seems sensible, say, if it goes down the route of issuing electoral ID cards (like over here).

Too many people don't have driving licences or passports, or will be arsed digging them out.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Tue Dec 27, 2016 9:49 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38440934

I was woken up earlier than my body wanted, but that actually seems sensible, say, if it goes down the route of issuing electoral ID cards (like over here).

Too many people don't have driving licences or passports, or will be arsed digging them out.

It leads to some of the issues they've had in America. First of all you make certain forms of ID a requirement, then you make it harder for the people who will vote for the other lot to get those certain forms of ID. Bingo, one successfully gerrymandered election. It's why a couple of US states have been declared as no longer running properly democratic elections by international bodies. It makes it harder for individuals to commit electoral fraud, but it actually makes it easier for governments to.

In any case, most of the electoral fraud cases in the UK in the last decade or so have involved postal voting. It's pretty much impossible to prove the person who stuck the letter in the post box actually was the person who was supposed to have done...

I still think we really need compulsory voting combined with a 'none of the above' option. That would make our elections much more representative at a stroke.


Tue Dec 27, 2016 1:37 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
I still think we really need compulsory voting combined with a 'none of the above' option. That would make our elections much more representative at a stroke.

I'd vote again in that scenario.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Tue Dec 27, 2016 2:02 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 3 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.