http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8331038.stm
 | | |
| Quote: A Home Office spokesman said: "Prof Nutt's views are his own." | |
| | |
And, er, that's what he gets called the whole way through the article
| x404.co.uk http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/ |
|
| Cannabis evidence 'was devalued' http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=3769 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | pcernie [ Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:56 pm ] | |||||||||
| Post subject: | Cannabis evidence 'was devalued' | |||||||||
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8331038.stm
And, er, that's what he gets called the whole way through the article
|
||||||||||
| Author: | adidan [ Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Cannabis evidence 'was devalued' |
This is what happens when halfwits, both Labour and Tory in this case, deal with Science. By all accounts he's now been sacked because the evidence doesn't say what MPs want it to say. Smith et al's position supported by their counterparts in blue. Add this together with the hypocrisy of those MPs, including Smith, who have admitted to using Cannabis in the past it all adds up to a bunch of laypeople who are saying "do as we say, not as we've done, nor for that matter what the scientific evidence states". Maybe they should go back to employing the numbnuts who cobbled together the WMD report. Sod that, why not just employ Bob The Builder as the Chief Scientific Advisor. |
|
| Author: | rustybucket [ Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Cannabis evidence 'was devalued' |
What really concerns me is that Cannabis is in Class B with Ritalin (which is given to children) whilst Class C contains GHB and Ketamine. WTF? I bet the wazzocks who get to decide drugs policy couldn't even tell me the difference between skunk and weed. 
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|