Ofcom by themselves can do nothing - it's only when the great unwashed complain can they do anything, which is usually investigate the allegations made by the public and see if there has been a breach of guidelines. What would you have them do differently?

They're supposed to enforce the broadcasting code - they could do so proactively. Most of the other regulatory authorities in this country operate both proactively and reactively.

And even when they do find something wrong the fine is laughable.

As it stands this is all academic - I believe the Tories are going to scrap/significantly alter Ofcom when they win power in June.

Ofcom seem to react to complaints the way the government reacts to news stories - if it gets enough media interest they'll at least be reported to do something about it

In 2007, Clarkson was criticised for described a vehicle as being "ginger beer", a term Ofcom said could be offensive to homosexuals.

What!? How is that term offensive!?

LMFTFY.

Thing is, not every Ofcom decision or inquiry is reported. Unless you're keeping up on the in's and out's of what Ofcom are doing, then all we're left with is what the press see fit to publish because of some sensationalist angle.

I'm surprised how many of you are familiar with the various regulations on broadcasting, that you're able to comment about the efficacy of what Ofcom do, to be frank...