x404.co.uk
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/

Working civil servants harder could save £60bn - Tories
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=4538
Page 1 of 1

Author:  pcernie [ Fri Nov 27, 2009 12:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Working civil servants harder could save £60bn - Tories

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8382271.stm

Quote:
The shadow public services productivity advisory board will feature a number of figures - yet to be named - described as "very senior advisers with established credentials".

A key Tory proposal is to move all government-owned property into central publicly-owned asset companies.

Government departments would then pay rent and the asset companies, using professional management, would be forced to squeeze as much as possible out of the government's real estate assets.

The Tories would also introduce greater competition within the public sector by allowing high-performing parts of it to bid to run other areas.

For example, a successful local authority planning department in one area could take charge of the planning responsibilities of a struggling council.

"What will matter to us is whether or not a successful outcome is delivered at an affordable price - not who delivers it," said Mr Hammond.


That could be so disastrous I don't know where to begin :shock:

Author:  paulzolo [ Fri Nov 27, 2009 1:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Working civil servants harder could save £60bn - Tories

I remember the last wave of Tory reforms. Departments became “agencies” which were not directly linked to an minister. This meant that if something screwed up, the minister could say “nothing to do with me - it was the agency”. This is how your Income Support stopped being paid by the DHSS and started to be paid by the Benefits Agency. Of course, being agencies also meant that it could be run more like a business, and less like a government department.

We have seen similar tactics used in other areas where business concerns should be bottom of the list: health care, education, policing. I am surprise we don’t have a Defence of the Realm Agency operating the military. Imagine if you applied the proposed model to that.

The net result of all this “modernisation” is job losses. They can’t say “you will do more for less,” because it’s an election-losing thing to say.

I know some people working in the civil service. One was looking to pay off his mortgage in a few years and find something less bothersome to do. I suspect that this could scupper his plans.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/