Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Police U-turn on photographers and anti-terror laws 
Author Message
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Quote:
There are very clear rules around how stop-and-search powers can be used. However, there are no powers prohibiting the taking of photographs, film or digital images in a public place. Therefore members of the public and press should not be prevented from doing so.
Independent Clicky
Halle-bloody-lujah.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:45 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
The ACPO have been reminding ordinary coppers about this for ages. I suppose they're that sick of the public backlash they're going to start coming down on this behaviour very hard.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:56 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Linux_User wrote:
The ACPO have been reminding ordinary coppers about this for ages.
I know, but it's seemingly done no good. In fact I'd go as far to say it's gone in the reverse direction. There's been a few very high profile cases of professional photographer being stopped just recently.
It really is about time that the S44 abuse was reigned in.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:13 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
Linux_User wrote:
The ACPO have been reminding ordinary coppers about this for ages.
I know, but it's seemingly done no good. In fact I'd go as far to say it's gone in the reverse direction. There's been a few very high profile cases of professional photographer being stopped just recently.
It really is about time that the S44 abuse was reigned in.

Mark


What really narks me about S.44 is that the public apparently have 'no right' to know where such areas are. If I ignore for the moment the ludicrous notion of people being subject to a law but somehow aren't allowed to know if it applies in their area, how are ordinary members of the public supposed to know if Police Officers are truly acting lawfully if they are using S.44 powers? If you don't know if the area is actually designated under S.44 or not, there is no way of knowing whether the PC is actually acting within his/her authority.

I recently wrote to my MP about this, and the response I got from the Home Office is appalling. They had no problem whatsoever with being in position where people ware subject to a law but are not allowed to know where such draconian powers can actually legally be used.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:23 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Quote:
The message says: "Officers and community support officers are reminded that we should not be stopping and searching people for taking photos. Unnecessarily restricting photography, whether from the casual tourist or professional, is unacceptable."


I first read that as casual terrorist.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:40 am
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
Quote:
The message says: "Officers and community support officers are reminded that we should not be stopping and searching people for taking photos. Unnecessarily restricting photography, whether from the casual tourist or professional, is unacceptable."


I first read that as casual terrorist.


Image

Very casual :lol:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:11 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
Linux_User wrote:
They had no problem whatsoever with being in position where people ware subject to a law but are not allowed to know where such draconian powers can actually legally be used.

Ignorance is no defense in law.

Sadly there seem to be many examples of laws which are immoral, inconsistent and even contradictory.

Writing to your MP was the correct first course of action. If enough people do this, then the weight of public opinion becomes apparent. It's far more effective than voting in some poll.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:55 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
Linux_User wrote:
They had no problem whatsoever with being in position where people ware subject to a law but are not allowed to know where such draconian powers can actually legally be used.

Ignorance is no defense in law.


Agreed - ordinarily - but taking it to the point where the public have no option but to be ignorant about the law is a step too far. You must then ask if that's fair and in the interests of justice.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:08 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 8 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.