Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Hazel Blears: PM did not have 'full facts' on expenses 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://news.bbc.co.uk/panorama/hi/front ... 393238.stm

Oh fcuk off, what about the 'flipping' if nothing else? :roll:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:53 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
I wish she would sod off.

She's a lying New Labour accolyte and I hope she goes away very quickly.

_________________
Jim

Image


Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:48 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 4860
Reply with quote
Quote:
Hazel Blears: PM did not have 'full facts' on expenses


a lying personage of great magnitude …
what she means is the PM didn't have her BS before him …

i wonder if her memory is failing …

Quote:
By “flipping” her second home three times within one year Miss Blears was able to purchase goods for multiple properties — all at the taxpayers’ expense. She was able to avoid paying capital gains tax on the sale of one property she had designated her second home by telling HM Revenue and Customs that it was her primary residence.

She sold the property in south London for £200,000, about £45,000 more than she paid for it. Revenue rules at the time of the sale stated that any profit made on a second home is subject to capital gains tax at 40 per cent. Miss Blears paid no capital gains tax because she had declared the home her primary residence.


Link to the full article

as much as i hate them, i would vote BNP before voting for this lying piece of crap …

_________________
Hope this helps . . . Steve ...

Nothing known travels faster than light, except bad news ...
HP Pavilion 24" AiO. Ryzen7u. 32GB/1TB M2. Windows 11 Home ...


Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:13 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
MrStevenRogers wrote:
Quote:
Hazel Blears: PM did not have 'full facts' on expenses


Well the obvious question is - what else is he making decisions about that he doesn't have the 'full facts' on? And isn't it slightly worrying that the PM doesn't have the full facts on such an important political issue? Shouldn't people be losing their jobs for not making sure he did have the full facts?


Sat Dec 05, 2009 8:05 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 4 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.