Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Public outrage feared over MPs' defence on expenses 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
Quote:
Politicians have urged the MPs facing charges over their expense claims not to use Parliamentary privilege to try to avoid court proceedings.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8502026.stm
If they don't stop this from happening all the party leaders should be sacked. Its a disgrace. :twisted: :evil:

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />


Sat Feb 06, 2010 5:38 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
Apparently that law is only in place to stop people being sues for anything they say in the House Of Commons. There is no way it should be used to prevent fraud prosecutions. These guys are just low life scum.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Sat Feb 06, 2010 7:38 pm
Profile WWW
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
These guys are just low life scum.


I doubt that you'll hear much of an argument against that statement.

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />


Sun Feb 07, 2010 9:14 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
64k basic salary plus many valid expenses. Why on Earth did they need any more?

I would love to see a timesheet for some MPs, afterall they are working for me.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sun Feb 07, 2010 9:23 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
AlunD wrote:
l3v1ck wrote:
These guys are just low life scum.


I doubt that you'll hear much of an argument against that statement.

Actually that is an insult to scum, both the pond life and the Rab C Nesbitt scum. :D

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:04 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
I would love to see a timesheet for some MPs, afterall they are working for me.

LMAO it would be a total work of fiction. To get a days pay they only have to arrive and then depart it can be within 2 or minutes of each other. :roll:

Amnesia10 wrote:
AlunD wrote:
l3v1ck wrote:
These guys are just low life scum.


I doubt that you'll hear much of an argument against that statement.

Actually that is an insult to scum, both the pond life and the Rab C Nesbitt scum. :D


Fair comment :D

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />


Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:54 am
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:10 pm
Posts: 1057
Reply with quote
So their defence is that they can break the law with impunity as they are an MP?

I think not.

_________________
Image


Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:56 am
Profile WWW
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
JohnSheridan wrote:
I think not.

I truly hope that is proved to be the case. :D

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />


Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:04 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
The obvious solution is for their constituents to boot them out at the next election then prosecute them.


Sun Feb 07, 2010 4:54 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
The obvious solution is for their constituents to boot them out at the next election then prosecute them.

and then shoot them.

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Sun Feb 07, 2010 5:09 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
The obvious solution is for their constituents to boot them out at the next election then prosecute them.

But then they get the huge golden handshakes to help them resettle in the community .............. ( about £60k I believe )

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />


Sun Feb 07, 2010 5:38 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
AlunD wrote:
jonbwfc wrote:
The obvious solution is for their constituents to boot them out at the next election then prosecute them.

But then they get the huge golden handshakes to help them resettle in the community .............. ( about £60k I believe )

Actually I can support the idea of resettlement grants if you lose your seat but if you retire and/or are above pension age then why? It is should also be scaled so that it falls the closer you are to pension age.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sun Feb 07, 2010 6:00 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
Well given the pension they get they don't need a settlement grant thats for sure :roll:

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />


Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:49 am
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
AlunD wrote:
Well given the pension they get they don't need a settlement grant thats for sure :roll:

Exactly. Plus if they are knowing they are retiring they have up to 4 years to plan for the event. More than most.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:17 am
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 1757
Location: Cardiff, Wales
Reply with quote
Watching the news now...amused that David Sh**face was holding a press conference, sniping at Labour when HE actually voted against the harsh reforms he is suggesting. What a useless hypocritical waste of space.

_________________
G.


Mon Feb 08, 2010 6:21 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.