x404.co.uk
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/

Climate scientists admit error over rising sea level data
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=6272
Page 1 of 1

Author:  pcernie [ Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Climate scientists admit error over rising sea level data

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2 ... cc-apology

Quote:
Climate experts have been forced to admit another embarrassing error in their most recent report on the threat of climate change.

In a background note – released by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) last night – the UN group said its 2007 report wrongly stated that 55% of the Netherlands lies below sea level. In fact, only 26% of the country does. The figure used by the IPCC included all areas in the country that are prone to flooding, including land along rivers above sea level. This accounts for 29% of the Dutch countryside.

"The sea-level statistic was used for background information only, and the updated information remains consistent with the overall conclusions," the IPCC note states. Nevertheless, the admission is likely to intensify claims by sceptics that the IPCC work is riddled with sloppiness.


Mistakes happen of course, but what they're suggesting really should be checked before being published :oops:

Author:  Amnesia10 [ Sun Feb 14, 2010 4:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Climate scientists admit error over rising sea level data

Yes sloppiness is their biggest enemy at the moment. Too many are rushing out publications without checking for the glory if they are right.

Author:  MrStevenRogers [ Sun Feb 14, 2010 4:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Climate scientists admit error over rising sea level data

swimming to the shops as we speak …

Author:  andytw [ Sun Feb 14, 2010 7:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Climate scientists admit error over rising sea level data

pcernie wrote:
Mistakes happen of course, but what they're suggesting really should be checked before being published


It doesn't help that when an issue is flagged to the IPCC it is ignored usually on the basis that it has (alledgedly) been peer reviewed.

An example here.

While the IPCC started as a scientific body it's output is now mostly political designed to promote the case for AGW rather than the facts.

Author:  paulzolo [ Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Climate scientists admit error over rising sea level data

A lot of chinks showing up in this whole “iron clad” climate change argument. I wonder what else has been bodged.

If we are to trust the scientists in their assessment, then their work has to be accurate, repeatable, accountable and open to scrutiny. Clearly it isn’t.

Author:  eddie543 [ Mon Feb 15, 2010 4:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Climate scientists admit error over rising sea level data

paulzolo wrote:
A lot of chinks showing up in this whole “iron clad” climate change argument. I wonder what else has been bodged.

If we are to trust the scientists in their assessment, then their work has to be accurate, repeatable, accountable and open to scrutiny. Clearly it isn’t.

Well I have a feeling scientific institutes are rapidly delting incriminating emails and related info.
paulzolo wrote:
A lot of chinks showing up in this whole “iron clad” climate change argument. I wonder what else has been bodged.

If we are to trust the scientists in their assessment, then their work has to be accurate, repeatable, accountable and open to scrutiny. Clearly it isn’t.

Well I have a feeling scientific institutes are rapidly delting incriminating emails and related info.

Theres good reason why this theory persists and its not outspoken conspiracy but each scientists personal conspiracy like institutionalised sexism, racism, religeon or belief of any kind.
Reasons for avid climate change belief off the top of my head:
1: feel good theory (everyone gets to save the world YAY [LIFTED]!)
2: band wagon
3: fear of losing your job
4: media
5: fear of losing credibility
6: cognitive disonence
7: institutionalisation by several means
8: them and us (Skeptics and alarmists)
It's not just active it's passive manipulation such as refusing funding to skeptical reseach without thought.
Look at how the Gov't is brainwashing young people in schools to believe it. This issue now turns up in geography, politics, biology and economics. Suddenly instead of multiculturalism in politics it is environment in the third unit as a topic. In geography every neo hippy teacher loves this theory. Economics often replaces what are relative questions concerning current and past economic issues with at least one question on each paper That is intrinsically biased as it assumes AGW theory as true.

This AGW theory will flake and disintergrate like the carcass of an animal it truly is.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/