Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Agreement reached on rules for live TV leaders' debates 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8545991.stm

Quote:
The BBC, ITV and Sky and the three main political parties have agreed on the rules for hosting live leaders' debates in the run-up to the general election.

The three 90-minute sessions will begin by focusing on domestic policies, international affairs and the economy.

The studio audiences will then be able to ask direct questions on any subject, with viewers doing the same via e-mail.

Labour's Gordon Brown, Tory David Cameron and Lib Dem Nick Clegg have welcomed the news.

The first debate, themed on domestic affairs, will be held in the north-west of England, with ITV newsreader Alastair Stewart moderating.

The second, focusing on global issues, will take place in south-west England, with Sky's political editor Adam Boulton in charge.

The third, broadcast by the BBC from the Midlands, will be moderated by Question Time host David Dimbleby and deal with the economy.

BBC political editor Nick Robinson said the debates on policy detail should provide some answers for viewers but complex rules would limit the role of the audience and the moderator.

Applause will be restricted to the beginning and end of the debates and the audience will not be allowed to respond to leaders' answers.

Broadcasters drew lots to determine the order of the debates and the themes while the parties drew lots for the order of speaking - Lib Dem leader Mr Clegg will open the first debate, Mr Brown the second, and Mr Cameron the third.

Mr Brown welcomed the news that agreement had been reached, saying: "I'm so optimistic about the future of our country that I relish the opportunity to debate the big issues and to set out my vision about what we as a country can achieve together, and then let the people decide."

Mr Cameron said he was "absolutely delighted" about the debates. He said: "I think people have got a right to look at the people putting themselves forward as our next prime minister and to see the choice and to see the change that we could make and to make up their own minds."

For the Lib Dems, Mr Clegg said the debates would allow leaders to be put under "real scrutiny".

"I think these debates will give people the chance to have a really good look at the leaders, their values, their character, their judgements, their policies, before they make up their mind how they are going to vote at the ballot box," he said.

The BBC is to hold separate party leader election debates in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and other parties will be able to respond to the debates on the news.

But for the SNP, Angus Robertson said: "London-based parties are going to receive exponentially more exposure and coverage than other political parties, I think licence fee payers and voters in Scotland will be asking themselves why they are being treated as second class citizens."

And Welsh Assembly member Elin Jones, for Plaid Cymru, said the debates were being set up "in a way that will mislead people into thinking that only the London parties are taking part in this election".

"In many constituencies in Wales, this election will be a two-horse race between Plaid Cymru and one other party, yet that will not be reflected in these debates," she added.

The sessions will be broadcast on weekday evenings, in the final three full weeks of the election campaign - exact dates will be decided once the prime minister calls the election, widely expected to be held on 6 May.

Party leaders will open with a one-minute statement, then take questions from the audience, studio and public via e-mail.

They will have a minute to answer the question, a minute to react, and four minutes of free debate.

All questions - those on the main themes, and those from audience members and via e-mails - will be selected by a panel of senior journalists.

Handshakes between the candidates will be restricted to the end of the programme.

A spokesperson for the joint broadcasting panel welcomed the agreement, adding: "We were delighted by the positive atmosphere in all our dealings with the parties over the last few months, and the agreement we are jointly announcing today represents a major step forward in the way election campaigns can reach the entire population."

The broadcasters have jointly appointed the market research company ICM to recruit an audience with a broad cross-section of views.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:08 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
I’m not sure about the format. It seems very rigid and doesn’t really involve the audience. I’d like to see exchanges between the pubic and the prospective PMs.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:16 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
I do hope that the second show presented by Sky has someone asking about should foreign media companies have any influence over UK papers or TV?

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:40 am
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
I’m not sure about the format. It seems very rigid and doesn’t really involve the audience. I’d like to see exchanges between the pubic and the prospective PMs.


+1, I was wondering how it compares with the US debates (by the sounds of it I mean)...

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:15 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
The US ones are very controlled to eliminate the chance of mistakes. They will have been rehearsed so much that any natural behaviour is gone. They all worry about the Nixon effect happening again. The audience are an irrelevance at these events.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:44 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
paulzolo wrote:
I’m not sure about the format. It seems very rigid and doesn’t really involve the audience. I’d like to see exchanges between the pubic and the prospective PMs.


+1, I was wondering how it compares with the US debates (by the sounds of it I mean)...


I watched one of the Presidential debates, and it was supposed to be the least rigid. It s so tightly controlled that it was a farce. It went like this:
Moderator or carefully selected member of the audience asks a question.

Each candidate had a 5 minute spot to address that part

The “discussion” part was a 2 minute rebuttal.

And this went on for about 90 minutes. It was dreadful to watch.

We have similar controls here. It’s not about the public interacting with the candidates anymore. It’s about us being passively fed their ideas. I will reiterate my comments I made in another thread. This is certainly going to be a campaign, but it’s become a marketing campaign, not an election campaign.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:33 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Yes the US Presidential debates were dire. I am amazed that anyone actually watched them unless they were paid to. The BBC should have a three hour debate with a live audience who ask their questions like a longer Question Time. Failure to attend will be mean that seats will be offered to minor parties. Each leader will be given a few minutes to outline their manifesto and then respond to questions about it.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:16 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes the US Presidential debates were dire. I am amazed that anyone actually watched them unless they were paid to. The BBC should have a three hour debate with a live audience who ask their questions like a longer Question Time. Failure to attend will be mean that seats will be offered to minor parties. Each leader will be given a few minutes to outline their manifesto and then respond to questions about it.

+1

This is what I was expecting and hoping for. I bet the marketing people in the shadows were very pushing for restrictions.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:29 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes the US Presidential debates were dire. I am amazed that anyone actually watched them unless they were paid to. The BBC should have a three hour debate with a live audience who ask their questions like a longer Question Time. Failure to attend will be mean that seats will be offered to minor parties. Each leader will be given a few minutes to outline their manifesto and then respond to questions about it.


Works for me I may even watch that. :D

Proving that the questions hadn't been planted could be an interesting exercise though. :D

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />


Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:32 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 9 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.