Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Think-tank calls for VAT change 
Author Message
Spends far too much time on here

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 4860
Reply with quote
Quote:
Politicians should consider imposing VAT on food, children's clothes and household gas and electricity, a report from a think-tank suggests.

Eliminating the exemptions on VAT would make the levy a less complex tax and bring the UK in line with other nations, according to Reform.

The right-leaning think-tank also questioned the structure, simplicity and certainty of the tax system.

Between 50% and 60% of what the average household buys includes a VAT levy.

VAT returned to 17.5% in the new year after being reduced to 15% on 1 December 2008.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8551492.stm

the tax rises have to start somewhere … ho humm …

_________________
Hope this helps . . . Steve ...

Nothing known travels faster than light, except bad news ...
HP Pavilion 24" AiO. Ryzen7u. 32GB/1TB M2. Windows 11 Home ...


Fri Mar 05, 2010 4:09 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Yes but not with VAT. Indirect taxes like VAT are regressive. Of course the right wing like them because it hits the bottom 90% of the population harder than the top 10%. The first areas that should be considered are the areas where tax cuts have been made in the past, such as higher income tax, capital gains taxes and only then hitting the poor with VAT hikes. It would also mean that to have no effect on the low paid it would mean a big rise in benefits and minimum wage.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Fri Mar 05, 2010 4:28 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Heard some woman from them being interviewed about this on the radio this morning. I would probably categorize her as 'a mental'. The interviewer reached the point of incredulity with her as she barfacedly claimed she'd rather pay 17.5% tax on groceries than 3% extra on luxury goods. I guess he buys a lot more jewelry than bread.

Jon


Last edited by jonbwfc on Fri Mar 05, 2010 4:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.



Fri Mar 05, 2010 4:36 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
Adding 20% to the energy bills would just cause huge amounts of suffering for the elderly and worst off. It would be Sheer stupidity IMHO.

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />


Fri Mar 05, 2010 4:37 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 4860
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but not with VAT. Indirect taxes like VAT are regressive. Of course the right wing like them because it hits the bottom 90% of the population harder than the top 10%. The first areas that should be considered are the areas where tax cuts have been made in the past, such as higher income tax, capital gains taxes and only then hitting the poor with VAT hikes. It would also mean that to have no effect on the low paid it would mean a big rise in benefits and minimum wage.


the bottom 90% are already bailing out the top 10%
its called taxpayers support for the 'banking' system

it requires a 'river' up affect as opposed to a 'trickle' down affect …

_________________
Hope this helps . . . Steve ...

Nothing known travels faster than light, except bad news ...
HP Pavilion 24" AiO. Ryzen7u. 32GB/1TB M2. Windows 11 Home ...


Fri Mar 05, 2010 4:48 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
Heard some woman from them being interviewed about this on the radio this morning. I would probably categorize her as 'a mental'. The interviewer reached the point of incredulity with her as she barfacedly claimed she'd rather pay 17.5% tax on groceries than 3% extra on luxury goods. I guess he buys a lot more jewelry than bread.

Jon

The reason being that she probably spends a lot less on food than she would on luxuries. That would hit her hard. Though income tax should actually go up along with capital gains taxes. If higher capital gains taxes had been in place we may not have had a property bubble and the MPs would have paid a lot more in taxes on their second homes.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Fri Mar 05, 2010 4:59 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
MrStevenRogers wrote:
it requires a 'river' up affect as opposed to a 'trickle' down affect …

Trickle down never ever existed. The taxes that were cut to supposedly encourage trickle down should be reversed.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:16 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 4860
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
MrStevenRogers wrote:
it requires a 'river' up affect as opposed to a 'trickle' down affect …

Trickle down never ever existed. The taxes that were cut to supposedly encourage trickle down should be reversed.



agreed
that is why i believe in a flat rate tax system across the board for everyone
with no 'get out of jail card free' for anyone …

_________________
Hope this helps . . . Steve ...

Nothing known travels faster than light, except bad news ...
HP Pavilion 24" AiO. Ryzen7u. 32GB/1TB M2. Windows 11 Home ...


Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:30 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm
Posts: 5152
Location: /dev/tty0
Reply with quote
The 'poor' wouldn't be affected so much, I could foresee extra benefits and various tax-cuts for them. It's the people who are just above the threshold that would be hit worst.


Fri Mar 05, 2010 6:04 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
MrStevenRogers wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
MrStevenRogers wrote:
it requires a 'river' up affect as opposed to a 'trickle' down affect …

Trickle down never ever existed. The taxes that were cut to supposedly encourage trickle down should be reversed.



agreed
that is why i believe in a flat rate tax system across the board for everyone
with no 'get out of jail card free' for anyone …

Flat rates are even worse.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Fri Mar 05, 2010 6:08 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
forquare1 wrote:
It's the people who are just above the threshold that would be hit worst.

+1

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Fri Mar 05, 2010 6:40 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:33 pm
Posts: 491
Location: UK, England.
Reply with quote
This can be solved by simply earning more money. When someone figure out how to, let me know.

_________________
Twitter: AdamW89
Flickr: The Hobgob

Nietzsche wrote:
Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.


Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:17 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:46 pm
Posts: 10022
Reply with quote
I think people who earn 100k or more should pay more taxes. Those in the private sector should pay more too.

_________________
Image
He fights for the users.


Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:13 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
cloaked_wolf wrote:
I think people who earn 100k or more should pay more taxes.

Your wish is my command sir. ;)

In Tax year 2010 - 2011 the 50% band will come into force on income over 150,000
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/rates/it.htm

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />


Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:07 am
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
cloaked_wolf wrote:
I think people who earn 100k or more should pay more taxes. Those in the private sector should pay more too.

+1 but private sector pay is determined by supply and demand, and what they can get away with.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:10 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 43 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.