Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Bulger Mother's Fury Over Adviser's 'Insult' 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-New ... 2987?f=rss

OK, should she have chosen her words more carefully, should it be viewed 'in context', is the mother over-reacting (though few would speak out to blame her)... :?

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Mar 13, 2010 10:56 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
His opinions are based on age of criminal responsibility, so if the children aren't criminally responsible then what they have done is more likely to be exceptionally unpleasant, rather than cowardicely brutal. Or however you want to word it.

Now if the children can't be held responsible, what about the parents? I do think there is some blame to be applied somewhere, making sure it goes to the right place is how to prevent something like this happening in the future.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sat Mar 13, 2010 11:14 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am
Posts: 1911
Reply with quote
She has every right to remain incandescent with rage towards the boys who killed her child, but Maggie Atkinson didn't do anything wrong. Ferguson is simply going mental because somebody used level headed language to describe something.


Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:50 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
Quote:
James's mother Denise Fergus demanded an apology over the comments she described as "twisted and insensitive", adding Dr Atkinson should then "resign or be sacked".

"To describe the murder of James as 'unpleasant' is an insult to his memory, and a downright lie," she told the Mercury Press.

"What they did to James was completely inhuman and to try to say it was 'unpleasant' is outrageous.

"To say that James 'ended up dead' is callous and almost makes it sound like an accident. I am furious about the way she has described his murder."

Funny how it isn't "twisted and insensitive", "an insult to his memory", "completely inhuman", "outrageous" or "callous" for Denise Fergus to cash in on her dear little boy being dead.

Hypocrite.

F*** off.

_________________
Jim

Image


Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:49 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
His opinions are based on age of criminal responsibility, so if the children aren't criminally responsible then what they have done is more likely to be exceptionally unpleasant, rather than cowardicely brutal. Or however you want to word it.

Now if the children can't be held responsible, what about the parents? I do think there is some blame to be applied somewhere, making sure it goes to the right place is how to prevent something like this happening in the future.

The parents of Venables and Thompson should have suffered for bringing up their kids so badly. As for what I have no idea.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sun Mar 14, 2010 1:22 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
The parents of Venables and Thompson should have suffered for bringing up their kids so badly. As for what I have no idea.

Neglect would be a good place to start.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sun Mar 14, 2010 2:19 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Children's chief apologises for Bulger killers comment

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8572028.stm

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Wed Mar 17, 2010 12:10 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:14 pm
Posts: 1598
Location: Right here...... Right now.......
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
His opinions are based on age of criminal responsibility, so if the children aren't criminally responsible then what they have done is more likely to be exceptionally unpleasant, rather than cowardicely brutal. Or however you want to word it.

Now if the children can't be held responsible, what about the parents? I do think there is some blame to be applied somewhere, making sure it goes to the right place is how to prevent something like this happening in the future.

A real dilemma for all parents is how responsible they feel towards the actions of their children. Before I had kids I was of the opinion that no matter what the kids did they were the responsibility of the parents. Now I have kids I would be mortified beyond belief if my kids did anything half as bad to an animal, let alone a human being. But, you have to be careful what you say in this politically correct times :roll: and it seems that both sides could have fared better?

Al

_________________
Eternally optimistic in a 'glass half empty' sort of way....


Wed Mar 17, 2010 1:39 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
This is a difficult choice. Kids nowadays know that they can get away with things. Raising the age of criminal responsibility does seem to be a PC decision but then if the law hit the parents in the Bulger case then the family would be split up anyway, with the parents doing gaol time.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:12 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 9 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.