x404.co.uk
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/

Security is "priority number 20 or 30 for Microsoft"
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=6927
Page 1 of 1

Author:  pcernie [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Security is "priority number 20 or 30 for Microsoft"

Quote:
Security chief Eugene Kaspersky has launched a scathing attack on Microsoft's security record.

Speaking in the week his company launched its latest security suite, Kaspersky Pure, the Russian CEO blasted Microsoft's free Security Essentials software.

"I don't really believe in this project," Kaspersky told PC Pro. "Microsoft security is like a man with a golf set on the London Underground - something's wrong."

"Microsoft has a lot of different businesses: Windows, Office, keyboards," Kaspersky added. "Security is priority number 20 or 30. The resources are spent on the most serious projects."

Kaspersky admitted that his company has bulked out the number of features in its security suite to deliberately distance the product from Microsoft's free package. "The winners will be the companies focusing on security," Kaspersky said, when asked whether he viewed Microsoft Security Essentials as a threat.

"Brand Microsoft doesn't care about security. Microsoft can change people's minds and make people think Microsoft is [about] security, but that will cost billions of dollars, I'm afraid."

In a statement sent to PC Pro Microsoft insisted "security is a top priority for Microsoft. Microsoft has invested heavily in security, ever since the creation of the Microsoft Trustworthy Computing initiative in 2002, an initiative to deliver, secure, private and reliable computing experiences.

"Our Security Engineering Centre embeds security into the development of all our products. Our Security Response Centre is dedicated to rapidly responding to security issues, and our Malware Protection Centre is staffed by probably one of the largest groups of dedicated security researchers in the world.

"The success of these initiatives and groups is supported by the quality of a variety of products including our highly rated and award winning free anti-malware product Microsoft Security Essentials.”

PC quarantine

Kaspersky did find some common ground with Microsoft when it came to the idea of ISPs cutting off infected PCs until they're cleaned - a suggestion put forward by Microsoft's security expert Scott Charney last week.

"In Russia, many ISPs have been doing it for years," Kaspersky claimed. "When they realise poisoned traffic is coming from a computer, they block the connection".

Kaspersky admitted it causes a few angry calls from customers, who wonder how they're meant to clean their computer when they can't download security software. The ISPs "say go to the shop and buy a box," according to Kaspersky.

And the Russian has no sympathy for people who claim they don't need security software. "Some people say 'I have nothing valuable on my machine, I don't need antivirus. Bad idea. They get a spambot and generate infected traffic. You pay for parasitic traffic, you fund the criminals."

"It's a dangerous environment, we have to protect ourselves," he concluded.


http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/security/35 ... -microsoft

:)

Author:  big_D [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Security is "priority number 20 or 30 for Microsoft"

See my comment there.

The guy is an arse.

Author:  cloaked_wolf [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Security is "priority number 20 or 30 for Microsoft"

Wasn't Kapersky one of the companies complaining that Vista was too secure and they couldn't get accrss to parts of the OS that they wanted to?

Morons

Author:  l3v1ck [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Security is "priority number 20 or 30 for Microsoft"

What's he complaining about? His company exists only because MS don't put security above ease of use etc.

Author:  Amnesia10 [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Security is "priority number 20 or 30 for Microsoft"

I do think that Microsoft are in a difficult position. If they make it so secure that you cannot compromise the machine you get complaints that they are putting the AV industry out of business.

Author:  big_D [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Security is "priority number 20 or 30 for Microsoft"

cloaked_wolf wrote:
Wasn't Kapersky one of the companies complaining that Vista was too secure and they couldn't get accrss to parts of the OS that they wanted to?

Morons

They are making the same claim about the iPhone OS! :roll:

Author:  Linux_User [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 5:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Security is "priority number 20 or 30 for Microsoft"

Security software? What's that? ;)

Author:  Amnesia10 [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 10:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Security is "priority number 20 or 30 for Microsoft"

Linux_User wrote:
Security software? What's that? ;)

A swear word at Microsoft.

Author:  finlay666 [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 10:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Security is "priority number 20 or 30 for Microsoft"

This shows the arrogance of some people tbh.

They sell an OS, and give away a lot of free software to encourage people to the brand.

He obviously doesn't realise Security Essentials is essentially OneCare as a free product updated.

They must REALLY be feeling a pinch if he is attacking free software, next he will attack AVG ;)

Author:  Linux_User [ Sat Mar 13, 2010 12:54 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Security is "priority number 20 or 30 for Microsoft"

finlay666 wrote:
This shows the arrogance of some people tbh.

They sell an OS, and give away a lot of free software to encourage people to the brand.

He obviously doesn't realise Security Essentials is essentially OneCare as a free product updated.

They must REALLY be feeling a pinch if he is attacking free software, next he will attack AVG ;)


TBH I think MS providing Security Essentials for free is a very good idea - I install it on every Windows machine I get my hands on (normally where a Norton trial has ended).

Author:  finlay666 [ Sat Mar 13, 2010 1:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Security is "priority number 20 or 30 for Microsoft"

Linux_User wrote:
TBH I think MS providing Security Essentials for free is a very good idea - I install it on every Windows machine I get my hands on (normally where a Norton trial has ended).


Same, it's a name people recognise, let alone can pronounce :roll: (Seen a number of regular customers struggle to pronounce kapersky when I worked in retail)

It's also good especially for free software, not bloated and doesn't bring a system to a grind when running a scan.

More importantly it updates when Windows update does the rounds, so it's an install and forget system.

Author:  Amnesia10 [ Sat Mar 13, 2010 10:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Security is "priority number 20 or 30 for Microsoft"

finlay666 wrote:
It's also good especially for free software, not bloated and doesn't bring a system to a grind when running a scan.

More importantly it updates when Windows update does the rounds, so it's an install and forget system.

That sounds like a much better product that many AV solutions. MacAfee the last time I used it in a friends machine was so bloated that it slowed the machine down noticeably. If it automatically updates itself and scans without interfering with the user than that is what users want. I was chatting to a friend who was checking his ex-wife's computer for her. She ran out of storage, despite having a 40 Gb partition which was unused. Her machine was loaded with trojans and malware. She never updated the definitions in more than a year because it interfered with what she wanted to do, and so she stopped them. No updates either. Though that is typical of the average user.

Author:  rustybucket [ Sat Mar 13, 2010 10:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Security is "priority number 20 or 30 for Microsoft"

Linux_User wrote:
Security software? What's that? ;)

:lol:

:roll:

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/