x404.co.uk
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/

BNP's new rules rejected by court
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=6930
Page 1 of 2

Author:  paulzolo [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:54 pm ]
Post subject:  BNP's new rules rejected by court

Hopefully one step closer to the BNP being declared illegal.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8564742.stm

I would like to congratulate the BBC for using that picture of NIck Griffin. It never fails to be funny and repulsive at the same time.

Author:  AlunD [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: BNP's new rules rejected by court

Image
Always makes me think of a guy who has had too much to drink getting up t make a speech at a wedding :D

Author:  pcernie [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: BNP's new rules rejected by court

AlunD wrote:
Image
Always makes me think of a guy who has had too much to drink getting up t make a speech at a wedding :D


Uncle Knobhead :lol:

Author:  AlunD [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: BNP's new rules rejected by court

pcernie wrote:
Uncle Knobhead :lol:

:shock: Oh you've met him :? ;) to

Author:  Amnesia10 [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: BNP's new rules rejected by court

pcernie wrote:
AlunD wrote:
Image
Always makes me think of a guy who has had too much to drink getting up t make a speech at a wedding :D


Uncle Knobhead :lol:

One day you will be Uncle Knobhead! :D

Author:  pcernie [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 5:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: BNP's new rules rejected by court

Well, I'm already an uncle :oops: , but you couldn't force me to attend a wedding, no matter who's getting maried :P

Author:  paulzolo [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: BNP's new rules rejected by court

AlunD wrote:
Image
Always makes me think of a guy who has had too much to drink getting up t make a speech at a wedding :D


“And anuvver thing — you gotta watch him, love. Any bit of skirt, and he’s there. You shouda seen him on the stag do in Amsterdam. He got pissed, stoned and went off with a right couple of growlers. I got pictchas. Tell you what, these mini projector things aint harf handy. Look at the munter he’s wiv...”

And so on.

Never, never ask Uncle Knobhead to the wedding. He’ll probably turn up anyway.

Author:  Amnesia10 [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 10:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: BNP's new rules rejected by court

paulzolo wrote:
“And anuvver thing — you gotta watch him, love. Any bit of skirt, and he’s there. You shouda seen him on the stag do in Amsterdam. He got pissed, stoned and went off with a right couple of growlers. I got pictchas. Tell you what, these mini projector things aint harf handy. Look at the munter he’s wiv...”

And so on.

Never, never ask Uncle Knobhead to the wedding. He’ll probably turn up anyway.

You hear that Ernie, we have you sussed already! :D

Author:  pcernie [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 10:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: BNP's new rules rejected by court

Amnesia10 wrote:
paulzolo wrote:
“And anuvver thing — you gotta watch him, love. Any bit of skirt, and he’s there. You shouda seen him on the stag do in Amsterdam. He got pissed, stoned and went off with a right couple of growlers. I got pictchas. Tell you what, these mini projector things aint harf handy. Look at the munter he’s wiv...”

And so on.

Never, never ask Uncle Knobhead to the wedding. He’ll probably turn up anyway.

You hear that Ernie, we have you sussed already! :D


I don't talk like that! I'm a different kind of stereotype :lol:

Author:  TheHobgob [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 11:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: BNP's new rules rejected by court

Whilst I do not agree with the BNP I can't say I agree with the campaign against them either. Nick Griffin has the write to stand in the street and say anything he wants, as does an extremist Muslim, Fathers for justice, Greenpeace (now don't get me started on them). As such the BNP have every right to only admit members that meet their "criteria," as do feminist groups, black police officers associated etc.

I thought we lived in a democracy? Wouldn't that mean allowing people to be undemocratic?

On a side note, that really is a funny picture it looks like hes about to vomit.

Author:  Amnesia10 [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 11:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: BNP's new rules rejected by court

TheHobgob wrote:
Whilst I do not agree with the BNP I can't say I agree with the campaign against them either. Nick Griffin has the write to stand in the street and say anything he wants, as does an extremist Muslim, Fathers for justice, Greenpeace (now don't get me started on them). As such the BNP have every right to only admit members that meet their "criteria," as do feminist groups, black police officers associated etc.

I thought we lived in a democracy? Wouldn't that mean allowing people to be undemocratic?

On a side note, that really is a funny picture it looks like hes about to vomit.

Freedom of speech is important. Though the groups you mentioned have different issues. Muslim extremists are also aiming for the overthrow of our way of life. Fathers for Justice are a campaign group who would disappear if the law treated fathers better. Greenpeace are an environmental group who if politicians did the right thing would also disappear. The BNP are entitled to free speech like any one else. A campaign against them is no different to that against the Tories or Labour.

Author:  pcernie [ Sat Mar 13, 2010 12:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: BNP's new rules rejected by court

Amnesia10 wrote:
Greenpeace are an environmental group who if politicians did the right thing would also disappear.


I doubt GP would disappear as quickly as you think, they're far too rabid for that IMO.

Author:  Amnesia10 [ Sat Mar 13, 2010 10:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: BNP's new rules rejected by court

pcernie wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
Greenpeace are an environmental group who if politicians did the right thing would also disappear.


I doubt GP would disappear as quickly as you think, they're far too rabid for that IMO.

There are a few extremists in every organisation, even the Tory Party. Oops bad example, they are mainly extremist pretending to be a mainstream party. :oops:

Though if whaling was banned everywhere and we actually took much better care of our planet then Greenpeace would disappear as a mainstream organisation.

Author:  pcernie [ Sat Mar 13, 2010 12:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: BNP's new rules rejected by court

Amnesia10 wrote:
pcernie wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
Greenpeace are an environmental group who if politicians did the right thing would also disappear.


I doubt GP would disappear as quickly as you think, they're far too rabid for that IMO.

There are a few extremists in every organisation, even the Tory Party. Oops bad example, they are mainly extremist pretending to be a mainstream party. :oops:

Though if whaling was banned everywhere and we actually took much better care of our planet then Greenpeace would disappear as a mainstream organisation.


You think some of the media whores in GP actually want their demands met? ;)

Author:  Amnesia10 [ Sat Mar 13, 2010 7:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: BNP's new rules rejected by court

If the mainstream politicians bring in tough green laws where will the support be for Greenpeace? They may be a few who will always push for the impossible. Though that will not cut it with the average supporter.

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/