Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Talk about not dragging your heels !!!!!!! 
Author Message
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:18 am
Posts: 385
Reply with quote
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8678282.stm

Start as they mean to go on huh !!!


Wed May 12, 2010 3:21 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
:D

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Wed May 12, 2010 3:26 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
That's two things they've scrapped so far?? :P

_________________
Image


Wed May 12, 2010 3:29 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Quote:
Ben Stewart, from environment group Greenpeace, added: "A third runway at Heathrow was always a bizarre proposal that made no sense to anybody who understood the impact aviation has on our climate.

This was more about being able to provide more selling opportunities to the public as they are stuck in the airport. If they needed more capacity for London Gatwick or Stansted would have made more sense. Though I am glad that it has be scrapped. It made no sense long term especially with global warming and peak oil about to hit.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed May 12, 2010 3:38 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
Damn those evil tories-libdems!!! :lol:

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Wed May 12, 2010 4:17 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Nick wrote:
That's two things they've scrapped so far?? :P
What was the first thing?

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Wed May 12, 2010 4:19 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=8206

_________________
Image


Wed May 12, 2010 4:22 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Coolio. Thanks for linking.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Wed May 12, 2010 4:25 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
It's terminals 1, 2 & 3 that need sorting out. They're crap. They should knock them down and rebuild them rather than building a new runway.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Thu May 13, 2010 2:17 am
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
It's terminals 1, 2 & 3 that need sorting out. They're crap. They should knock them down and rebuild them rather than building a new runway.


So the planes can land on the roof? :lol:

_________________
Image


Thu May 13, 2010 2:22 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
It's terminals 1, 2 & 3 that need sorting out. They're crap. They should knock them down and rebuild them rather than building a new runway.

And have more like terminal 5 and more lost luggage? ;)

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Thu May 13, 2010 5:13 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
It's terminals 1, 2 & 3 that need sorting out. They're crap. They should knock them down and rebuild them rather than building a new runway.


I think those plans are already in motion.


Quote:
Today's announcement reveals that air passenger duty will be scrapped and replaced by a tax on the plane, not passenger.


:D

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Thu May 13, 2010 6:17 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 12 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.