Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
£12million Ferrari 
Author Message
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
It's a lovely looking car, but I'm not sure I'd want to spend £12million on any one thing if I had it.
The Sun clicky

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri May 14, 2010 9:35 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Quote:
Perfection... the Leonardo da Vinci of motoring.

That's a stupendously stupid thing to say. I assume they mean 'the Mona Lisa of motoring'.

Jon


Fri May 14, 2010 9:58 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
Quote:
Perfection... the Leonardo da Vinci of motoring.

That's a stupendously stupid thing to say. I assume they mean 'the Mona Lisa of motoring'.

Jon


It's The Scum, this surprises you?

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Fri May 14, 2010 10:03 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
It wasn't The Scum, it was another publication who wrote that. I've got the magazine here in fact.

It is so choice. If you have the means, I highly recommend picking one up.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Fri May 14, 2010 10:05 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
It is so choice. If you have the means, I highly recommend picking one up.
I really would rather have an immaculate E-Type.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri May 14, 2010 10:06 am
Profile WWW
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
I really would rather have an immaculate E-Type.


+1

Or an MG.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Fri May 14, 2010 10:27 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
timark_uk wrote:
I really would rather have an immaculate E-Type.

+1
Or an MG.

Thing is, you'd have to assume a car that costs that much is essentially undriveable, since you'd never get insurance so you can't drive it on the roads and it would be so expensive to repair (let alone if you wrote it off) that you'd just never take it out of the garage. Particularly if, as the article says, you were buying it as an investment. Every mile you put on the speedo would cost you a fortune.
Plus.. the bare fact is old cars, even very very very nice old cars, are actually a bit crap. Mechanically they're generally very primitive and often quite uncomfortable. Motoring technology & engineering have advanced quite a way in the last 50 years. There are companies that will take an e-type or classic MG and upgrade it to the point where it drives and handles as well as a modern car does, as oppose to something from the stone age, but they charge as much again as the car costs. And you wouldn't do it to that one anyway, because you'd destroy it's value immediately.

I mean, it's his money to spend and if he makes money on the deal fair enough but the... rose tinted spectacles aspect doesn't really wash to me. It's a wonderful, beautiful object but as a car? You'd be better off buying say an Porsche 911 or Audi R8. They'd be more comfortable, safer, massively better performance wise, be less work to drive and cost a hundredth of the price.


Fri May 14, 2010 10:47 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
ProfessorF wrote:
It is so choice. If you have the means, I highly recommend picking one up.
I really would rather have an immaculate E-Type.

Mark


Didn't spot the Ferris Bueller reference then? ;)

jonbwfc wrote:
Thing is, you'd have to assume a car that costs that much is essentially undriveable, since you'd never get insurance so you can't drive it on the roads and it would be so expensive to repair (let alone if you wrote it off) that you'd just never take it out of the garage. Particularly if, as the article says, you were buying it as an investment. Every mile you put on the speedo would cost you a fortune.
Plus.. the bare fact is old cars, even very very very nice old cars, are actually a bit crap. Mechanically they're generally very primitive and often quite uncomfortable. Motoring technology & engineering have advanced quite a way in the last 50 years. There are companies that will take an e-type or classic MG and upgrade it to the point where it drives and handles as well as a modern car does, as oppose to something from the stone age, but they charge as much again as the car costs. And you wouldn't do it to that one anyway, because you'd destroy it's value immediately.

I mean, it's his money to spend and if he makes money on the deal fair enough but the... rose tinted spectacles aspect doesn't really wash to me. It's a wonderful, beautiful object but as a car? You'd be better off buying say an Porsche 911 or Audi R8. They'd be more comfortable, safer, massively better performance wise, be less work to drive and cost a hundredth of the price.


That all depends very much on what you're buying the car for.
I think cars, all cars, were meant to be driven. So you should drive them. How often and how far is something for you to decide. Even with an inter-galactic mileage on it, Mr Evans could afford to have the car rebuilt to a standard better than when it left Maranello. And given that there's only a handful left in the world, I doubt if you'd do much harm to the value, although the more original a car is the better the price.
However - if you like the E-Type, intend to drive it a lot, then why not give it to a firm like Eagle to sort out and modernise and make it more useable?
It's swings and roundabouts, and ultimately comes down to what you want the car to do.
We were looking at an ad for a Bentley Turbo R recently. We worked out that the depreciation on the car had cost the owner about £8 every mile from new.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Fri May 14, 2010 10:53 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
Didn't spot the Ferris Bueller reference then? ;)
'fraid not. Soz man.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri May 14, 2010 10:59 am
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
Well it was $6 million cheaper than the previous one on sale. Though does $20 million count as a bargain?

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Fri May 14, 2010 11:23 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
I'm with Prof.

I used to be secretary for the Austin Healey Car Club (New Forest) and we used to take the Healeys out several times a month for meet-ups (my brother used his every day as his normal car) and we used to autotest them 3 or 4 times a year, have runs out to Le Mans or Montlerey and track days at Goodwood or Castle Coombe.

They were great fun to drive. Yes, they were basic, yes, the handling was poor, compared with a modern BMW M3 etc. But that was the charm, without breaking the speed limit or driving like a complete loon, you could have a lot of fun, drifting the rear etc.

The same with motorbikes. I used to have a 98 Honda VFR800, great bike, great all-rounder and I drove all over Europe on it, but the most fun bike I rode was a 1938 BMW. It had original spec tyres and brakes. It was fine on normal roads, and I actually managed to outride some guys in their Power Ranger suits on new sports bikes - riding around the outside of them on a bend, sliding the back end out. It was controllable, I wasn't breaking the speed limit, I was riding faster than guys on modern sports bikes and it was FUN!

I could have done exactly the same speed (or much faster) on the VFR and left the sports bikes behind me even quicker, but I would have put my licence at risk and I wouldn't have had as much fun...

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Fri May 14, 2010 11:37 am
Profile ICQ
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
250GTO is stunning. I always fancied the Jag XKSS too. VERY rare car. When I worked at Jag they had one at Browns Lane and I used to drool over it on a regular basis. Looks more stunning and curvy in the flesh.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Fri May 14, 2010 11:40 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Scotland
Reply with quote
not as nice as the enzo photos I posted :(

also photographed this in Paris:

seems rare

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

_________________
Image


Fri May 14, 2010 12:01 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
brataccas wrote:
also photographed this in Paris:

seems rare


I think that's a Dino.

There were only 36 250 GTO's built, and picking one up for £12 million is actually a couple of million shy of the record, but I suppose in these straitened times...

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Fri May 14, 2010 12:21 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
Just found this about the SS too. Oh my..... http://www.classicandperformancecar.com/features/octane_features/240448/octanes_top_ten_cool_cars.html

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Fri May 14, 2010 12:30 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 35 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.