View unanswered posts | View active topics
It is currently Wed Jul 30, 2025 6:31 am
Police Federation warns about rise in civilian staff
Author |
Message |
pcernie
Legend
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm Posts: 45931 Location: Belfast
|

 |  |  |  | Quote: Police forces may soon employ more civilians than officers, the Police Federation of England and Wales claims.
The body, which represents officers, says the proportion of police to civilians has fallen sharply over a decade in forces in England and Wales.
It warns that the drive to cut costs is putting the public at risk by making it harder to handle unplanned emergencies.
Police chiefs, however, say civilian staff free up officers to do the work they trained to do.
According to the Police Federation's research, there are on average fewer than one-and-a-half officers to every civilian, down from nearly two-and-a-half.
In Surrey and Northamptonshire, the number of civilians already outstrip officers, the body says.
In the last decade, the number of employees in the forces has almost doubled, according to the federation. Among the civilian posts are community support officers whose introduction was strongly opposed by the Police Federation.
Others include people working in custody suites or as crime scene investigators - roles previously carried out by officers.
Speaking on the eve of the federation's annual conference, its chairman Paul McKeever said the research revealed promises to keep officer numbers high might be nothing more than "smoke and mirrors".
He called on the new coalition government to order a full and independent review of policing and ask the public what it wanted from those on the beat.
Mr McKeever said: "I find it alarming that there is no tangible evidence that even suggests, let alone proves, the value brought by civilianising increasing numbers of police posts.
"At a time of financial restraint across the public sector, a rise in police staff numbers is absolute nonsense when the public want more police officers on the beat.
"Instead we have increasing numbers of unaccountable, unidentifiable police staff who do not have the flexibility or resilience to give what is needed as an emergency service."
'Difficult period'
Chief Constable Peter Fahy, of the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo), said many forces invested in staff to take the "administrative burden" away from officers.
"Police officers are better trained and better prepared to deal with unexpected and unplanned events.
"The police service is now entering what will be a very difficult period given the financial situation and will be looking very closely at every aspect of spending including the best mix of staff, best use of overtime and how to continue to protect and serve the general public."
Police minister Nick Herbert said: "The new government shares the desire of the Police Federation to see more of its officers out on the beat, keeping our communities safe.
"That is why we will cut through the bureaucracy and red tape that frustrates the police and the public alike and free up officers to get back to doing what they do best - fighting crime." |  |  |  |  |
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8685905.stmSo what do you make of that?
_________________Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/
|
Mon May 17, 2010 9:06 am |
|
 |
Amnesia10
Legend
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am Posts: 29240 Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
|
I have a friend who is a civilian in the police, he does the local police websites. Not many police can do what he does, the problem is that the police need a number of civilians to do many tasks that the police do not do, like canteen, cleaning, HR, and admin. The issue is that are the numbers of admin being used effectively as are the police numbers being used effectively?
_________________Do concentrate, 007... "You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds." https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTkhttp://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21
|
Mon May 17, 2010 9:57 am |
|
 |
HeatherKay
Moderator
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm Posts: 7262 Location: Here, but not all there.
|
The TV report I just saw says many civilian staff are actually doing investigation work, as opposed to just the admin and cleaning. They're being trained as police officers, but not actually being police officers, if that makes any sense.
_________________My Flickr | Snaptophobic BloggageHeather Kay: modelling details that matter. "Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.
|
Mon May 17, 2010 10:00 am |
|
 |
Nick
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm Posts: 3527 Location: Portsmouth
|
Which is obviously a bad thing. One of the examples given in the OP though is in the custody area. I don't see anything wrong with that - our prisons are staffed by civilians. Unless prison service staff are trained as police officers? Which I highly doubt.
_________________
|
Mon May 17, 2010 10:05 am |
|
 |
Amnesia10
Legend
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am Posts: 29240 Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
|
Yes it does. I have no problems with cleaners, they probably make up less than 1% of the total staff, even the forensics are specialised but many of these have been out sourced.
_________________Do concentrate, 007... "You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds." https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTkhttp://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21
|
Mon May 17, 2010 10:22 am |
|
 |
Nick
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm Posts: 3527 Location: Portsmouth
|
Why do you have to be a police officer to collect forensic evidence?
In my mind, police officers are law enforcement. i.e. the front lines, dealing with the public.
_________________
|
Mon May 17, 2010 10:34 am |
|
 |
HeatherKay
Moderator
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm Posts: 7262 Location: Here, but not all there.
|
I don't suppose you do. They are, after all, being trained for the role. I think the problem is folk have an old-fashioned notion of what the police "service" is supposed to be. For many it's blue uniforms, pointy helmets, Dixon of Dock Green, joining the "force" and jobs for life, and all that. These days, though, the front line officers don't have time to deal with all the paperwork associated with their jobs, and it's not sensible to tie up experienced officers tracking down forensic evidence for a case. It's a changing world, no doubt.
_________________My Flickr | Snaptophobic BloggageHeather Kay: modelling details that matter. "Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.
|
Mon May 17, 2010 10:38 am |
|
 |
adidan
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:43 pm Posts: 5048
|
Civilian Staff - great for backroom work and freeing up Police, I don't think they should encroach onto frontline work.
IMO we should get rid of all the CCTV that has no statistically significant impact on preventing crime or catching criminals and put that money into replacing Community Support Officers with proper Police.
CSOs, they have to have balls, but they are ineffectual compared to real coppers as people know they basically can't do anything other than call for back up.
_________________ Fogmeister I ventured into Solitude but didn't really do much. jonbwfc I was behind her in a queue today - but I wouldn't describe it as 'bushy'.
|
Mon May 17, 2010 11:19 am |
|
 |
okenobi
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm Posts: 4932 Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
|
I've got a great idea, why not just give police "powers" to private security staff? That should ease the load on the poor buggers.
Oh wait, somebody already thought of that..... Genius.
|
Mon May 17, 2010 2:07 pm |
|
 |
rustybucket
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm Posts: 5836
|
How about reforming the justice system so that we don't have a 90% reoffending rate?
_________________Jim
|
Mon May 17, 2010 2:38 pm |
|
 |
Amnesia10
Legend
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am Posts: 29240 Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
|
better still abolish all crimes then no more crimes. 
_________________Do concentrate, 007... "You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds." https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTkhttp://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21
|
Mon May 17, 2010 5:34 pm |
|
 |
okenobi
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm Posts: 4932 Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
|
How about, [LIFTED] off whining? 
|
Mon May 17, 2010 7:01 pm |
|
 |
Nick
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm Posts: 3527 Location: Portsmouth
|
Thanks for the valuable input okenobi.
_________________
|
Tue May 18, 2010 6:57 am |
|
 |
big_D
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm Posts: 10691 Location: Bramsche
|

Forensics makes a good area to use non-police workers. It should be a highly trained job and they need to be competent at doing their work. A bobby should have the training not to disturb anything and leave it to the collection crew to do the donkey work, meaning he can go onto the next "public facing" task and the "experts" can assemble the evidence.
The same goes for a lot of admin roles, such as payroll, cleaning, building services etc.
I still think you need a police officer in charge of the custody suite, although having a couple of chimps running around handing out meals and cleaning up after drunks is okay. But you still need a trained officers to deal with unruly prisoners.
Same for writing up transcripts of interviews, a secretarial staff will be able to do that better and more quickly (and probably with less emotion) than the arresting officer.
Here, in Germany, we also have the "Ordnungsamt", which work with the police. They do the work of meter maids and also patrol city centres, parks etc. and stop people for minor offences, like riding a bike in pedestrian zone, calling in tow trucks for illegally parked cars, stopping people drinking on the street or lighting BBQs in areas where it is prohibited or dangerous.
They have the rights to move people on and to make on-the-spot fines, but they can't arrest. If the problem escalates, they have to call in the real cops.
This leaves the police free to do real policing matters.
_________________ "Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari
Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246
|
Tue May 18, 2010 7:36 am |
|
 |
okenobi
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm Posts: 4932 Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
|
|
Tue May 18, 2010 7:58 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|