Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Eric Pickles vetoes Audit Commission boss' £240,000 pay 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Quote:
A Cabinet minister has vetoed a pay package of almost £240,000 for the new head of the Audit Commission, saying "spiralling" pay levels "stop here".

Communities Secretary Eric Pickles warned other public sector bodies to expect similarly severe decisions.

Local councils in particular should end "ridiculous" pay for bosses, he added.

The new Coalition government requires any centrally-funded public sector worker earning more than the prime minister to have their pay signed off.

The responsibility for that lies with the Treasury, or for some non-departmental public bodies, a secretary of state.
Rich list

Cabinet members recently accepted a 5% pay cut, worth £7,500 to Prime Minister David Cameron, who is paid £142,500 as a minister on top of his £64,766 salary as an MP.

The Audit Commission, England's local government spending watchdog, reportedly asked the government to approve a salary and pension package worth £239,800 a year for its new chief executive.
Continue reading the main story

Councillors should have the confidence to set sensible salaries that the public deem fit and proper

Eric Pickles Communities Secretary

Mr Pickles said the sum was excessive, pointing out that the public coffers were "empty".

He said: "The spiralling level of pay and perks for town hall bosses stops here.

"By blocking this massive salary for the Audit Commission, I want to send a signal to councils across the country that they too can stop paying ridiculous sums to chief executives.

"Councillors should have the confidence to set sensible salaries that the public deem fit and proper."

He added that the government should lead from the top, cutting bosses' pay from the Cabinet downwards and restoring an ethos of public service.

The latest public sector rich list published by the TaxPayers' Alliance in December revealed at least 805 people earning packages of £150,000 or more a year.

They worked across 358 government departments, quangos, public corporations, public bodies and nationalised industries - earning on average £226,000 per annum.

The top three non-bank public sector pay packages were:

* The then chief executive of Royal Mail, Adam Crozier, on £1.3m. He has since become ITV's chief executive,
* Channel 4 board member Kevin Lygo, who earned £1.1m and has also announced a move to ITV; and
* Network Rail chief executive Iain Coucher who pocketed £947,000.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/10194479.stm

I'll be astounded if they have the Ed (Balls) to see this through to it's it's natural conclusion. I can't quite shake the feeling it's smoke and mirrors though...

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun May 30, 2010 6:30 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
I would support the cap on pay for all public bodies. What they could do is stop grants to all bodies where anyone earns over £150 000 and drive them out. Councils have basically been scammed by chief executives moving from one council to another and boosting their pay every time. Also a ban on the employment of headhunters, because it is in their interest to boost pay to stratospheric levels as their fees are based on the salary. Even if they capped the pay at £100 000 I guess you would still have plenty of applicants for many of these jobs.

When you add in their golden pension they are more than well paid.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon May 31, 2010 1:22 am
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:23 pm
Posts: 638
Location: 3959 miles from the centre of the Earth - give or take a bit
Reply with quote
What this says is that running a council is more difficult that running the country.

_________________
i7 860 @ 3.5GHz, GTX275, 4GB DDR3


Mon May 31, 2010 12:07 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
dogbert10 wrote:
What this says is that running a council is more difficult that running the country.

Wow Football must be really hard then? :D

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon May 31, 2010 1:44 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 4 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.