Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
If Tomorrow's World came back, what should it be like? 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2 ... in-science

I always think about that show since there's barely a day where I don't read or realise, 'Christ, X exists now.'

The show would be more relevant than ever now; massive advances in every branch of science and technology, government spying, the ethics of it all, climate change... There's any number of 'characters' who'll appear and talk on the cheap, and if the Beeb's lucky, be controversial :)

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:14 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am
Posts: 7935
Location: Manchester.
Reply with quote
If it does come back let's hope it isn't just "the beeb gadget show."

It has to have an educational element or I really don't think it will be worth it.

Sent from my big ass Sony Xperia Z Ultra tabphonelet, using Tapatalk 4.

_________________
okenobi wrote:
John's hot. No denying it. But he's hardly Karen now, is he ;)

John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker :P
Sorry :roll:
I'll behave now.
Promise ;)


Fri Jul 25, 2014 7:37 pm
Profile WWW
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
John_Vella wrote:
If it does come back let's hope it isn't just "the beeb gadget show."

It has to have an educational element or I really don't think it will be worth it.

Sent from my big ass Sony Xperia Z Ultra tabphonelet, using Tapatalk 4.


+1, TGS tells you next to nothing whilst wasting your time with the 'challenges'.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Fri Jul 25, 2014 7:42 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
All it would need to do is take CLICK and extrapolate things a few years ahead.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri Jul 25, 2014 7:45 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Certainly bits of 'Click' would go into it but I think Click is a bit... scattergun compared to how TW was. Click are happy to show stuff that they and we know have no chance of making any ripples just because they're weird or funny. TW had it's moments but generally it was much more focused and dealt with stuff that was at lease possibly going to come to something and left the truly crazy stuff to other people/shows.

You'd end up with a lump of Click, a bit of The Big Bang, a pinch of the Top Gear news section (and only that part of TG) and a side serving of the kind of stuff Stuff/T3 magazines do. I don't think that would be a bad thing overall - I'd certainly watch it


Fri Jul 25, 2014 8:39 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am
Posts: 7935
Location: Manchester.
Reply with quote
The kind of thing I liked in tw was when cds first came out and they actually explained how they worked. Ok, they went slightly overboard with the whole mashed potato on the disc thing but that sort of programming, IMHO, really works.

Sent from my big ass Sony Xperia Z Ultra tabphonelet, using Tapatalk 4.

_________________
okenobi wrote:
John's hot. No denying it. But he's hardly Karen now, is he ;)

John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker :P
Sorry :roll:
I'll behave now.
Promise ;)


Fri Jul 25, 2014 9:05 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
When the first Google self driving cars came along, the US media was in a frenzy, how innovative that was and how they were leaving the traditional car makers in the dust, because this was all new and innovative. My first thought was, I remember seeing the first steps in this direction in the 70s and 80s on Tomorrow's World, where VW, Volvo and Mercedes were working on similar technologies, but of course the sat nav hadn't been invented and computers weren't' as advanced as they are now, so they were driving in trains and using road side beacons to orient themselves.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Sat Jul 26, 2014 4:19 am
Profile ICQ
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
All it would need to do is take CLICK and extrapolate things a few years ahead.

Mark

Totally agree, it could be very interesting,

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />


Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:52 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Scotland
Reply with quote
people will be back to cavemen soon so none of those ideas/future tech will be useless :cry:

_________________
Image


Sat Jul 26, 2014 6:20 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am
Posts: 7935
Location: Manchester.
Reply with quote
What I really think we don't need is reviews of the latest shiny toys. Surely explaining how the technology works will empower the great British public, which will help them cut through the crap they're being fed by the sales drones at <<insert name of electrical retailers here>>

_________________
okenobi wrote:
John's hot. No denying it. But he's hardly Karen now, is he ;)

John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker :P
Sorry :roll:
I'll behave now.
Promise ;)


Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:00 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:44 pm
Posts: 4141
Location: Exeter
Reply with quote
I think even just going by the name, any product that one can actually buy shouldn't be on the show at all, as it's effectively "Today's World". I think to be interesting it needs to focus on what serious R&D people are working on.

_________________
"The woman is a riddle inside a mystery wrapped in an enigma I've had sex with."


Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:19 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 11 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.