Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
TV Licenses 
Author Message
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:28 pm
Posts: 851
Location: EC1 Baby!
Reply with quote
...so again I've a letter from the TV license people. A long time ago I won the "there are no TVs being used to watch TV in my flat" with them - but having since bought a new telly, they're back on the case - convinced once more I'm watching TV. We still don't.

But times have changed since I last spoke with them - and I note they now mention a whole list of equipment in the blurb that "qualifies" needing a license - although I'm not sure how they can qualify "games consoles" as such, since we don't stream internet TV to them (I couldn't even if I wanted since the Pro edition of TVersity isn't supported by 2K).

So I guess what I'm trying to ask, is how do I go about (in this modern day technological quagmire) telling them to go bother someone else?


Mon May 17, 2010 3:39 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
snowyweston wrote:
...so again I've a letter from the TV license people. A long time ago I won the "there are no TVs being used to watch TV in my flat" with them - but having since bought a new telly, they're back on the case - convinced once more I'm watching TV. We still don't.

But times have changed since I last spoke with them - and I note they now mention a whole list of equipment in the blurb that "qualifies" needing a license - although I'm not sure how they can qualify "games consoles" as such, since we don't stream internet TV to them (I couldn't even if I wanted since the Pro edition of TVersity isn't supported by 2K).

So I guess what I'm trying to ask, is how do I go about (in this modern day technological quagmire) telling them to go bother someone else?

Write them a letter that states go [LIFTED] themselves :twisted:

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Mon May 17, 2010 3:43 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:35 pm
Posts: 1657
Location: Ipswich
Reply with quote
It's a standard letter; if you brought a new TV the retailer has to info the TV licensing company.

If you have no means of watching streamed or broadcast TV then you have no worries let them keep sending the letters.

_________________
www.youtube.com/hyperviper34


Mon May 17, 2010 3:54 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 12:43 pm
Posts: 1798
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
I'm confused... so you bought a new TV but you don't use it?

I'm pretty sure if you own a TV that's kept at your premises, then you need to buy a TV License - whether it's used to watch TV or not. It's a piece of equipment that's capable of viewing TV broadcasts, and for that reason you need a license.

_________________
* Steve *

* Witty statement goes here *


Mon May 17, 2010 4:03 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
I don't know how it is exactly there, but a computer or games console in the building + Internet connection means you need to have a licence, whether they are actually connected to the connection or not and whether or not you stream TV; they have the ability to receive... :?

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Mon May 17, 2010 4:10 pm
Profile ICQ
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:44 pm
Posts: 4141
Location: Exeter
Reply with quote
steve74 wrote:
I'm confused... so you bought a new TV but you don't use it?

I'm pretty sure if you own a TV that's kept at your premises, then you need to buy a TV License - whether it's used to watch TV or not. It's a piece of equipment that's capable of viewing TV broadcasts, and for that reason you need a license.


My understanding from the last time I had this issue myself is that if the system is setup in such away that simply scrolling through all the channels yields no picture then that was fine and no license was required.

_________________
"The woman is a riddle inside a mystery wrapped in an enigma I've had sex with."


Mon May 17, 2010 4:11 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
jonlumb wrote:
My understanding from the last time I had this issue myself is that if the system is setup in such away that simply scrolling through all the channels yields no picture then that was fine and no license was required.

It has to be impossible to watch TV if connected to an aerial before you are exempt form having to have a license.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon May 17, 2010 4:21 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 12:43 pm
Posts: 1798
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
I suppose if your property has no aerial whatsoever, or you rip it out if one exists, then you may be able to prove that no TV picture is achievable then you could argue that watching TV on your, erm, TV is impossible. Simply unplugging it from the existing working aerial socket won't be enough for them, as you could easily plug it back in once they've gone (if they chose to pay you a visit) - your property would have to have no aerial at all in order to prove that watching TV was impossible.

But I think it'll be hard to prove, legally. May even mean a visit to the courts eventually. Personally, I would just pay up, is it worth the hassle?

_________________
* Steve *

* Witty statement goes here *


Last edited by steve74 on Mon May 17, 2010 4:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Mon May 17, 2010 4:32 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
steve74 wrote:
Personally, I would just pay up, is it worth the hassle?
Hell yeah! If you don't watch TV on the set then there's nothing to pay for.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Mon May 17, 2010 4:34 pm
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 12:43 pm
Posts: 1798
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
Hell yeah! If you don't watch TV on the set then there's nothing to pay for.
Mark

Yes, but I could also argue that I don't watch any BBC channels as there's never anything on them worth watching, so I don't need a license, yes?! :lol:
I could also say that I've turned the colour down on my TV, so I'll only pay for a Black & White license... that OK?! :lol:

As you know, it doesn't really work like that - if you've got a working TV set on the premises (or the ability to watch live TV or BBC iPlayer), then you need a TV License - there's no grey areas as far as I know.

_________________
* Steve *

* Witty statement goes here *


Mon May 17, 2010 4:43 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
I know. [LIFTED] stealth tax, that's what it is.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Mon May 17, 2010 4:54 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
I know. [LIFTED] stealth tax, that's what it is.

Mark

Agreed, scrap it and it would save millions in paperwork.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon May 17, 2010 5:04 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:28 pm
Posts: 851
Location: EC1 Baby!
Reply with quote
steve74 wrote:
I'm confused... so you bought a new TV but you don't use it?
Yes. And No. We use it only as a monitor to watch DVDs, play our console games on & to navigate our music server (via the xbox)

steve74 wrote:
I'm pretty sure if you own a TV that's kept at your premises, then you need to buy a TV License - whether it's used to watch TV or not. It's a piece of equipment that's capable of viewing TV broadcasts, and for that reason you need a license.
I've just spoke with them and explained that no TV is watched in our house - explaining that although we had equipment capable of recieving, we didn't actually recieve any because we never sought to. We did once look into it, years ago, but house aerial is kaput - so even if we wanted to (for which we'd gladly pay) we couldn't.

They've got me on record saying as much, and have told me to ignore any subsequent letters until such a time when we require a license. Which, if I've anything to do with it, will be never.


Mon May 17, 2010 5:10 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
timark_uk wrote:
I know. [LIFTED] stealth tax, that's what it is.

Mark

Agreed, scrap it and it would save millions in paperwork.


The BBC always hide how much it costs to collect fees by mixing it in with transmission costs.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Mon May 17, 2010 5:13 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:28 pm
Posts: 851
Location: EC1 Baby!
Reply with quote
Clarified by them themselves - http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-y ... logy-top8/


Mon May 17, 2010 5:18 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 48 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.