Reply to topic  [ 380 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 26  Next
Doctor Who, Season 33 
Author Message
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJeBQ2DYnGc
Oh right. Now I get it.
Not really a review, more overview.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Tue Sep 18, 2012 8:41 pm
Profile WWW
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
There's a Dave Gibbons Doctor Who trade paperback:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Doctor-Who-Dave ... 267&sr=8-4

Though I'd advise buying it elsewhere, Amazon's stock's shocking sometimes!

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:15 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
19:30 today.
Just a reminder.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:08 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am
Posts: 7935
Location: Manchester.
Reply with quote
Thanks Mark :D

_________________
okenobi wrote:
John's hot. No denying it. But he's hardly Karen now, is he ;)

John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker :P
Sorry :roll:
I'll behave now.
Promise ;)


Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:58 am
Profile WWW
Officially Mrs saspro
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:55 pm
Posts: 4955
Location: on the naughty step
Reply with quote
Well the end on this was rubbish!
the concept was really good but really should have been a double episode to have a good ending :S


Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:57 am
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
TheFrenchun wrote:
Well the end on this was rubbish!
I'd did feel a little bit like "great story, shame about the ending" didn't it?
I hope we haven't seen the end of the black boxes, like you say, great concept.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:02 am
Profile WWW
Officially Mrs saspro
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:55 pm
Posts: 4955
Location: on the naughty step
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
TheFrenchun wrote:
Well the end on this was rubbish!
I'd did feel a little bit like "great story, shame about the ending" didn't it?
I hope we haven't seen the end of the black boxes, like you say, great concept.

Mark

The power of three thing just finished me off. It was so cheesy :S.


Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:03 am
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
TheFrenchun wrote:
The power of three thing just finished me off. It was so cheesy :S.
Did you notice it was all told in flashback?
The whole 'power of three' thing was old hat to me, as I watched every episode of Charmed so I couldn't get that out of my head for this episode.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:16 am
Profile WWW
Officially Mrs saspro
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:55 pm
Posts: 4955
Location: on the naughty step
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
TheFrenchun wrote:
The power of three thing just finished me off. It was so cheesy :S.
Did you notice it was all told in flashback?
The whole 'power of three' thing was old hat to me, as I watched every episode of Charmed so I couldn't get that out of my head for this episode.

Mark

I saw that a lot of it was flashbacks. Also, Rory's dad is quite awesome
I don't want Doctor Who to be as cheesy as Charmed :P


Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:20 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 6580
Location: Getting there
Reply with quote
TheFrenchun wrote:
The power of three thing just finished me off. It was so cheesy :S.

Yes, ridiculously cheesy.

_________________
Oliver Foggin - iPhone Dev

JJW009 wrote:
The count will go up until they stop counting. That's the way counting works.


Doodle Sub!
Game Of Life

Image Image


Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:21 am
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
TheFrenchun wrote:
I don't want Doctor Who to be as cheesy as Charmed :P
As much as I enjoyed Charmed, it would certainly be a turn for the worse if Doctor Who started becoming like it.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:31 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:06 pm
Posts: 6355
Location: IoW
Reply with quote
TheFrenchun wrote:
Well the end on this was rubbish!
the concept was really good but really should have been a double episode to have a good ending :S

I was convinced it was going to be a double episode.

The doctor was so intent on saving everyone, but did nothing about the unconscious people on the spaceship?

On the plus side, the angels are coming back. They freak me out.

Although, they mentioned the original purpose of the angels again as sending people back in time and feeding of the resultant time energy. That happened the first time we encountered them - the Tennant episode with the DVD extras one-sided conversation - but in the more recent one with the 'soldiers of the church', they were killing people.

_________________
Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!


Sun Sep 23, 2012 6:49 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
Again we are reminded that not all companions have a happy ending. Some leave, some get left behind, some die. We are being nicely reminded of the Doctor’s problems, and the darkness that follows him.

And we do need a Lethbridge-Stewart in charge of UNIT.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Sun Sep 23, 2012 7:00 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
And we do need a Lethbridge-Stewart in charge of UNIT.
Amen to that. (8+)

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sun Sep 23, 2012 7:02 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Spreadie wrote:
Although, they mentioned the original purpose of the angels again as sending people back in time and feeding of the resultant time energy. That happened the first time we encountered them - the Tennant episode with the DVD extras one-sided conversation - but in the more recent one with the 'soldiers of the church', they were killing people.

This. I loved the Angels the first time, but the second time they rather ruined them. Previously they had been rare and unusual and.. clever. Second time they were far too 'standard monster'. Especially when the writers decided they actually could move when they were being looked at, as long as they did it fairly slowly.


Sun Sep 23, 2012 8:58 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 380 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 26  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.