Reply to topic  [ 210 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14  Next
Ridley Scott: 'I'm doing pretty good, if you think about it' 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
pcernie wrote:
if he goes for any half-measures either way
Alien is the film that gave Ridley his big break in to Hollywood. I seriously doubt he's going to take half measures with it.
Take Blade Runner (yes yes yes, I know) as an example. As I've said, it crashed and burned at the cinema upon initial release, but he poured his time and money in to the remastering and restoration of that film (even going as far as to hire Harrison Ford's son to stand in for his dad in a key reshoot).
I don't think Ridley Scott knows how to do anything of his films in half-measures.

Mark


I'm specifically talking about the Alien he thinks (and I agree) is overused though - it already seems Fox don't understand just what it'll take to give this series legs again, never mind beardy with his artistic righteousness ;)

It wouldn't surprise me if it only got to this stage cos of the 3D aspect...

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Oct 02, 2010 7:18 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
I'm specifically talking about the Alien he thinks (and I agree) is overused though
It's not going to be the same Alien that we were introduced to in the first film.
If you think about it, over the course of the first four films, the creature transformed and metamorphosed throughout. It's safe to say that the alien we saw in the first film was also the process of a transformation.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Oct 02, 2010 7:24 pm
Profile WWW
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
pcernie wrote:
I'm specifically talking about the Alien he thinks (and I agree) is overused though
It's not going to be the same Alien that we were introduced to in the first film.
If you think about it, over the course of the first four films, the creature transformed and metamorphosed throughout. It's safe to say that the alien we saw in the first film was also the process of a transformation.

Mark


Yeah that's what I was thinking, but it's always been humanoid IIRC (even the Dog Alien to an extent), and I'm wondering how much the Fox bean counters will push for that - I honestly believe they'll need to make it genuinely scary again and/or give it quite an overhaul.

By the way, always loved the fact it took on characteristics of the host :geek:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Oct 02, 2010 7:40 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:29 pm
Posts: 5975
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
By the way, always loved the fact it took on characteristics of the host :geek:


Yes, a great concept that the Alien of the first movie had elements from the Space Jockey and from Kane. I do hope that they can get Giger back in the fold though, I think there'd be a chance that he would come up with something suitable.

Just as a matter of interest for anybody who's not seen these, here's the artwork which Dan O' Bannon and Scott decided to use as the basis for the Alien.

Image

And the top figure here was used as an initial design for the Space Jockey

Image

_________________
"I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet." - Stanislaw Lem


Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:25 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
If you can get your hands on the full, oversize version of Giger's Necronomicon I'd certainly recommend it.
It's a brilliant book chronicling the work of the artist.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:36 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:29 pm
Posts: 5975
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
If you can get your hands on the full, oversize version of Giger's Necronomicon I'd certainly recommend it.
It's a brilliant book chronicling the work of the artist.

Mark


Mine is hidden safely away along with Giger's Alien. Both are well worth tracking down.

_________________
"I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet." - Stanislaw Lem


Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:41 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
I love the imagery, but I've often wondered if Giger ever did get round to seeing a psychologist :lol:

IIRC, he offered O' Bannon opium on their first encounter. O' Bannon asks him why he smokes it and Giger says, 'For my nightmares', before displaying what became the Alien in his sketchbook :shock:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:43 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
timark_uk wrote:
pcernie wrote:
I'm specifically talking about the Alien he thinks (and I agree) is overused though
It's not going to be the same Alien that we were introduced to in the first film.
If you think about it, over the course of the first four films, the creature transformed and metamorphosed throughout. It's safe to say that the alien we saw in the first film was also the process of a transformation.

Mark


Yeah that's what I was thinking, but it's always been humanoid IIRC (even the Dog Alien to an extent


The argument about the Alien in the first film is that it had not fully developed and we saw fully mature ones in Aliens. This is obviously some rather nice post-sequel speculation on the part of James Cameron, as I doubt that Scott or Giger had a sequel in mind.

The Dog Alien was actually an ox alien - the original screenplay (which was used for the novelisation) had one of the oxen used to pull the escape pod out of the sea infected. Only later, to pace up Alien 3, the dog was replaced. The Special Edition in the Quadrilogy set uses the ox as the host - and much better for it it is too.

I like the idea of the Alien using DNA from the host - or at least having the host influence the creature to a certain extent. However, we also have to bear in mind that the Alien appears to be a hive based creature, and, much like ants and termites, there are different classes of the creature, and the “Dog Alien” could just have been a certain form used in the protection of the Queen embryo - which is what its function appeared to be in the film. Social insects, such as ants, beets, wasps etc can develop differently depending on their feeding or treatment by other members of the colony. There is enough natural precedent to be able to argue that the host has no influence over the development of the final hatched creature, BUT that other environmental factors would.

I am really interested to see what Scott comes up with for the prequels - should they get off the ground, and should Fox not want to get too involved. However, as we know, the have serious form with the franchise.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:54 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
His nightmares are chiefly centred around a train journey (or at least they were around the mid '90s), that was very badly realised in the film Species. It's informed his work for a very long time indeed.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:56 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:29 pm
Posts: 5975
Reply with quote
Good old Dan O' Bannon. Not only the writer of Alien, but also Dark Star, Dead and Buried, Lifeforce :) , Return Of The Living Dead ("Send more paramedics!") and Total Recall, amongst others.

_________________
"I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet." - Stanislaw Lem


Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:58 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
His nightmares are chiefly centred around a train journey (or at least they were around the mid '90s), that was very badly realised in the film Species. It's informed his work for a very long time indeed.

Mark


http://www.hrgiger.com/ghost.htm

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Sat Oct 02, 2010 9:02 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:38 am
Posts: 2967
Location: Dorchester, Dorset
Reply with quote
Well Ridley, well.

_________________
I've finally invented something that works!

A Mac User.


Sat Oct 02, 2010 9:09 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
There is enough natural precedent to be able to argue that the host has no influence over the development of the final hatched creature, BUT that other environmental factors would.


The AvP films should just be forgotten altogether in that debate:

Image

Image

:shock: :(

And this is what happened when a Facehugger met a croc (would that actually work? Must've had strong legs or the croc was asleep lol):


Image

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:53 am
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Love these:

Image

http://www.ugo.com/therush/gallery/alien-hybrids/668/8/

(scroll down for others)

Another great Alien/Predator pic collection from all forms of media:

http://aliensandpredators.tumblr.com/archive

8-)

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Oct 03, 2010 10:49 am
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Alien prequel gets studio approval

Quote:
Lost screenwriter Damon Lindelof has just delivered his script for the Alien prequel to the chaps at 20th Century Fox, and word is that they really love it.

Not because it kicks all kinds of xenomorph booty, but because it’s probably going to cost less to make than Ridley Scott’s original proposed budget of $150m. C’mon, they are studio execs after all.

Still, even if the good news is more monetary than creative, Natalie Portman has officially met with Scott and his team, and is the current favourite for the lead role of a “female Colonial marine General”.

More positive news keeps on coming in the report that Lindelof’s script should be a sparse, creepy number that while not involving too many giant action set pieces, imitates the feeling of the original Alien with off-screen violence and few F-bombs.

Vulture spoke with an insider who had this to say about the possiblities of a PG-13 prequel, and why it's not necessarily a bad idea of Alien vs. Predator proportions:

“The thinking is that if the original Alien were released today, minus the F-bombs, you could still get a PG-13. Alien is a very Jaws-ian movie: There’s no sex, and while there’s lots of violence, most of it is off-camera. Maybe you’d have to cut away from certain scenes two seconds earlier, but it could be done.”

So that’s where the Alien prequels currently stand. Now let’s get some official casting underway, hey?


http://www.totalfilm.com/news/alien-pre ... o-approval

Not one bit of that inspires confidence in me personally :(

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Oct 16, 2010 10:01 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 210 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.