Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Pixar films 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
leeds_manc wrote:
I think Wall E is actually superb, beautiful, just astounding, with Finding Nemo, it definitely represents Pixar at their best.


Absolutely. Wall-E amazed me.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Sat Apr 16, 2011 3:04 pm
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
leeds_manc wrote:
timark_uk wrote:
I thought Wall•E was actually quite a depressing story.
You would, it has to do with love, which is horrible and painful, as we all know.
It was about a whole lot of stuff besides love.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Apr 16, 2011 3:23 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:19 pm
Posts: 5071
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
Nah, it was all about love, apart from some simple digs at America being a consumerist society. If you say that Wall E isn't about love it's like saying Cinderella is about dresses and palaces, The Lion King is about animals, and Transformers was about explosions.

Oh no wait that last one is true.


Sat Apr 16, 2011 3:31 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
leeds_manc wrote:
If you say that Wall E isn't about love it's like saying …
I suppose love does play a bigger part in the film than just that between two main characters; love for ourselves, and the environment that we find ourselves in, love for others around us and the way we go about our daily lives and the impact we have on other people and our surroundings.
Essentially the film portrayed humans as a scourge not only on Earth (which it all but destroyed before heading off to contaminate space) but also out in the Universe.
There's no hope for humanity — even at the end of the film (no spoilers here I hope) there's nothing to suggest that things are actually going to turn out good in the end.
So humanity gets a second chance on Earth. Whoopee.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Apr 16, 2011 3:46 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
I liked Monsters Inc and the Incredibles. So sequels are fine as long as they are at the same high standard. Though as can be shown from Shrek they can get lazy and rely on the characters getting them through weak plots.

Shrek 2 was bettwe than Shrek
Shrek 3 was a little bit poor
Shrek 4 was a steaming turd.

I'd quite like to see an Incredibles 2.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Sat Apr 16, 2011 3:49 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
I'd quite like to see an Incredibles 2.

I quite like to see a sequel to that. There is a natural progression for the story as the kids age.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:00 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:37 pm
Posts: 835
Location: North Wales UK
Reply with quote
Generally speaking, I like all of the Pixar movies apart from Cars and Up.

I think that one of the problem with Cars is that I read a poor review before I watched it and spotted all the faults with it- like the main characters were- well- just cars!

Up was OK for a watch, but there was nothing there that made me want to see it again.

Love Monsters Inc. and Finding Nemo. I am always quoting the turtles. Sweet!

I also love the out-takes that they insert at the end.

As for the Toy Story franchise. I still love all three, although I think that I can see why others might not like them if I am truly honest.

_________________
My lowest spec operational system- AT desktop case, 200W AT PSU, Jetway TX98B Socket 7, Intel Pentium 75Mhz, 2x16MB EDO RAM, 270MB Quantum Maverick HDD, ATI Rage II+ graphics, Soundblaster 16 CT2230, MS-DOS/Win 3.11

My Flickr


Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:08 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:29 pm
Posts: 5975
Reply with quote
Loved:
Toy Story 1, 2 and 3
Incredibles
Monsters Inc
(and the short film about alien abduction)

Liked:
Cars (visually stunning)
Finding Nemo
WALL-E
A Bug's Life

Didn't like:
Ratatouille
Up (apart from first 10 mins it was actually boring)

Not Pixar, but loved Iron Giant and many of the Studio Ghibli films. Oh, and Shrek and Ice Age.

_________________
"I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet." - Stanislaw Lem


Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:19 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:19 pm
Posts: 5071
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
Cars was scrapped by Pixar early on, but part of Disney's takeover stipulated that they'd re-do Cars and force it out, they did a good job polishing up a bad idea in the end, but it just ended up being awkward, like Days of Thunder awkward, you really don't care what happens but you kinda wait to see what happens anyway.

I think Wall-E as a character was a beautifully poignant way of showing up the flaws of humanity, as a small robot is seemingly able to see all that is beautiful about humans, when all the humans care about is breakfast in a cup. A robot throws away the diamond ring because he likes the way the case flips back and forth, a robot who collects junk and re-enacts cheesy musicals and sings and dances, and then meets the love of his life, and he instinctively wants to protect her. It shows up our lack of love for our own planet (without resorting to Avatar-levels of in your face preaching). It's about the human capacity for love of all things, and the real ending of Wall-E is in the credits, as they shun the technologically-aided lifestyle in exchange for going back to basics, as the cave-drawing style animations show us families working the land and cleaning up the mess - ignore the adverts telling you to re-priorities your life, telling you what colour clothes to wear, focus on the things you instinctively truly care about.


Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:22 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
The fact Wall-E kept me entertained and interested despite the lack of dialogue in the first part is a testament IMO to the films qualities.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:33 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
leeds_manc wrote:
If you say that Wall E isn't about love it's like saying …
I suppose love does play a bigger part in the film than just that between two main characters; love for ourselves, and the environment that we find ourselves in, love for others around us and the way we go about our daily lives and the impact we have on other people and our surroundings.
Essentially the film portrayed humans as a scourge not only on Earth (which it all but destroyed before heading off to contaminate space) but also out in the Universe.
There's no hope for humanity — even at the end of the film (no spoilers here I hope) there's nothing to suggest that things are actually going to turn out good in the end.
So humanity gets a second chance on Earth. Whoopee.

Mark

I think there are major cultural defences between us and the Americans. I can see why it's seen as uplifting and positive at the end - it's the kind if redemption tale that is usually found in the more facile sic-fi offerings that pervade SyFy these days.

However, this side of the Atlantic, we see things in a different light. I'd agree with Mark, Wall E is hopelessly depressing. I feel that humanity which has been surviving on what is essentially the B Ark for generations has arrived at its ultimate obese, indolent form. There is nothing to suggest that humanity has the will, drive or even the physical strength to clear the rubble found on Earth and starting again. I fear that Wall E 2 should feature the erstwhile little droid using resuscitation paddles to jump start the hearts of the humans who have collapsed due to cardiac arrest caused by the sudden demands that a fledgling agricultural society would place on a human body. Humanity is just not up to it in that condition. It will fail, and spend it's last months gasping for breath through minimal exertion.

Failing that, someone will find the ON switch for all the dead hardware lying around, and the human race will continue in the fat, lazy, bloated form that it has become.

People cried at the end of the film, I understand. The only thing that would make me want to cry is the utter hopelessness of it all. The ship's navigator should have blown the whole fat blubbery lot out of the airlock and saved us all a lot of time in trying to arrive at the assumptions that Disney expected us to arrive at.

This is, I know, a very cynical loom at the film. However, there are, as I said, fundamental differences between the needs of a USA audience and a UK one. We much prefer disaster and conflict, and a more ambiguous resolution. The USA needs to see heroic triumph in the face of adversity adversity. So, an American film about an asteroid threat would have people travelling to the rock and stopping it hitting the planet. We would have it hit the planet, and then have the whole humanity dealing with the after effects. Our story would end far less positively than the American one would. It's how we are, so seeing a different outcome for Wall E is not as crazy as it may appear.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:37 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Thank you Paul.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:48 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
Thank you Paul.

Mark


You’re welcome.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:09 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:19 pm
Posts: 5071
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
Yes Paul, that ending you just described is depressing, but you just made up a completely different ending for the film. In the film they are strong enough, they do succeed. *shrug* And to critisice a fairytale for having an idealised ending is like criticising opera for people singing to each other. Totally not realistic!


Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:20 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
leeds_manc wrote:
Yes Paul, that ending you just described is depressing, but you just made up a completely different ending for the film. In the film they are strong enough, they do succeed. *shrug*

I saw the *promise* of a happy ending, but not the happy ending that we expect. Maybe the film was left deliberately open to interpretation.

leeds_manc wrote:
And to critisice a fairytale for having an idealised ending is like criticising opera for people singing to each other. Totally not realistic!


Fairy tails are pretty grim(m) and sinister in content, and end far less clear and upbeat that you would expect. The Grimm brothers collected and wrote down these tales which were traditional to the areas they visited and generally told using various oral traditions. They certainly don’t all have a happy ending, and if they do, it’s usually with a cost to the protagonists.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_little_mermaid
End - she dies, and dissolves into the foam. No happy ending marriage here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinderella
Step Sisters end up marrying Lords - implying some kind of reward despite their treatment of Cinderella.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapunzel
One story variation has her trapped forever in the tower after the witch cut the hair.

Disney like to run things through their Sanitation Engine, and provide a standard issue Happy Ending. It sells burgers, Barbies and holidays.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:49 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.