View unanswered posts | View active topics
It is currently Fri May 30, 2025 5:24 am
Author |
Message |
TheFrenchun
Officially Mrs saspro
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:55 pm Posts: 4955 Location: on the naughty step
|
I'm not sure I like the idea of designing the ring. It puts a lot of pressure on the woman and it feels a bit like "here love, get yourself something". It also puts a lot of pressure on the guy money wise.
|
Thu Jun 05, 2014 1:55 pm |
|
 |
saspro
Site Admin
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:53 pm Posts: 8603 Location: location, location
|
It's a bit like sending a cheque as a birthday/christmas present
|
Thu Jun 05, 2014 2:04 pm |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|

I can see the logic in that. I can also see the other side, which is the notion that instead of having something off-the-shelf and kind of generic, you get something that's entirely personal and unique. So it just depends how you take it. Tell you a story. I went to an auction once by a guy who'd spent his whole life collecting meteorites. His wife had finally got fed up of having her whole house filled with rocks - along with the cost of going all round the world to find them - and had told him to sell it all off. This isn't hearsay by the way, it was in the prospectus for the auction  . Anyway, along with lots of bits of meteorites, he had things that had been made from bits of meteorites. One of those things was a pair of wedding rings. Now, you think 'what, stone wedding rings?' but no. Meteorites are actually mostly iron. They have an elliptical orbit in space and as they go round the sun, repeatedly nearer then farther away, they get repeatedly heated and cooled, heated and cooled, hundreds of times over the course of millions of years, all in zero gravity. The result of this natural process is that meteoric iron has a very peculiar crystalline structure and it's a structure that cannot be formed on planet Earth. It's simply physically impossible. And each meteorite has it's own crystal structure, so you can trace bits of meteorite back to the same initial lump that fell out of the sky. These rings looked... amazing. They were solid metal but they had a strange surface texture, they looked like a window that has frost on it, with lots of tiny filaments. This wasn't engraved on, this was what the metal was like all the way through. Now, some people would look at those and say "what? Iron? It's not special. It's not gold or platinum. And what's with the look, why hasn't it got a nice engraving on it or something?'. But as someone who knew why they looked that way, how they were utterly impossible to replicate, I thought they looked incredibly beautiful. The value of a thing is subjective, impossible to calculate for anyone else. Whatever ring Wolfie buys, his other half will cherish it not because of what it is made of or how much it costs, but because of what it represents. And that's not really quantifiable. So buy a ring that, when you look at it, you say to yourself 'yep, that's the one'. Don't try to analyse it, because you can't. Because the biggest number on the list of things to judge it on doesn't exist yet.
|
Thu Jun 05, 2014 2:50 pm |
|
 |
saspro
Site Admin
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:53 pm Posts: 8603 Location: location, location
|
Designing wedding rings together is a great idea but maybe not engagement rings. An engagement ring is a symbol or token. If you shop for it together or design it you're putting a price on it.
Would you like to have the discussion about "I love you but not that much"
|
Thu Jun 05, 2014 3:10 pm |
|
 |
timark_uk
Moderator
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm Posts: 12143 Location: Belfast
|
Engagement rings are much more personal to a woman than the wedding ring is. As long as they look good together on the finger, the wedding ring usually doesn't matter. That's why the engagement ring is much more elaborate than the wedding ring, which is usually just a plain band. I'd never be so presumptions as to criticise someone else's selection process for a ring for their significant other. It is about the two people involved, not what anyone else may think. You may not like the ring or agree with how it was chosen but then it wasn't you doing the picking.
Good luck to CW and future Mrs. CW.
Mark
|
Thu Jun 05, 2014 4:34 pm |
|
 |
John_Vella
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am Posts: 7935 Location: Manchester.
|
OK, I've given the silly reply, so now I should also give the sensible one... Mrs V. says go to Tiffany's. You can't go wrong with them.
She also says it should cost three months wages, but I know we've had this conversation on the forum before, so I'll just add her words and not comment on them.
_________________John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker  Sorry  I'll behave now. Promise 
|
Thu Jun 05, 2014 5:22 pm |
|
 |
TheFrenchun
Officially Mrs saspro
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:55 pm Posts: 4955 Location: on the naughty step
|
That's a lot of money to be carrying :s I'd be bricking it and never wear it if it cost that much :s
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
Thu Jun 05, 2014 5:51 pm |
|
 |
Spreadie
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:06 pm Posts: 6355 Location: IoW
|
Good luck to you.
As for the ring, decide how much you can afford and then visit the jeweller. Then find the best one in your price range.
Something fairly simple and elegant (note: I did not say cheap) will be well received. It's more about the act than the ring so, providing it isn't hideous, all should be well.
_________________ Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!
|
Thu Jun 05, 2014 7:05 pm |
|
 |
Paul1965
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:29 pm Posts: 5975
|
This approach worked well for me.
_________________ "I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet." - Stanislaw Lem
|
Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:34 pm |
|
 |
timark_uk
Moderator
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm Posts: 12143 Location: Belfast
|
You're not carrying money, you're wearing a gift from your lover. (A little less shouty this time *laugh*). Mark
|
Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:52 pm |
|
 |
saspro
Site Admin
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:53 pm Posts: 8603 Location: location, location
|
A potentially extremely expensive gift, I'd probably rather carry £10k in cash on me than a bit of jewellery that costs the same
|
Fri Jun 06, 2014 6:59 am |
|
 |
Zippy
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:20 pm Posts: 3838 Location: Here Abouts
|
I am possibly a bit unusual, but I'm also extremely practical and I didn't want a 'rock' type ring that I would be afraid to lose or damage. I do a lot of work both on cars, with animals and in the garden and I didn't want a ring I would either be afraid to wear, or have to keep taking off and risk losing. Red chose me a black rhodium ring set with cubic zirconia which is eminently practical. The symbolism of it was always much more important than the actual 'bling' and he could have proposed with a coke can ring (if they still did them) and I've have been ecstatic.
That said, my best suggestion for a more 'normal' girl would be to buy something that you like and that you think she'd like, keep the receipt and then if she doesn't love it (I'd be surprised) you can go back to the shop together and choose something else.
_________________The Official "Saucy Minx"  This above all: To Thine Own Self Be True "Red sky at night, Shepherds Delight"..Which is a bit like Shepherds Pie, but with whipped topping instead of mashed potato.
|
Fri Jun 06, 2014 8:57 am |
|
 |
TheFrenchun
Officially Mrs saspro
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:55 pm Posts: 4955 Location: on the naughty step
|
If my lover was stupid enough to splash thousands on a bit of jewelry, he wouldn't be that for long 
|
Fri Jun 06, 2014 9:09 am |
|
 |
cloaked_wolf
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:46 pm Posts: 10022
|

I recall the "three months' wages" thing and I ended up asking whether it was supposed to be gross or net. Either way, I don't think £10k on an engagement is a smart move at this point as it'll put a huge dent in our house deposit. I was looking at £2-3k which I felt was more reasonable, especially as she wants a matching wedding band (or two!).
I know cost shouldn't come into it but I'm thinking of the future. I would rather spend money towards a better honeymoon (she's already hinted that she liked the idea of two destinations when she learned my sister had done just that for her honeymooon). I've had a chat with my sister who reckons one matching wedding ring would be fine and then I could always get another on our one year anniversary.
I've also thought of buying a temporary ring from a jeweller's and then taking it back for one that she would prefer but the problem is that one store appears to go to a max of £2.5k and another seems to start at £2k as a minimum. Maybe I need to look at more shops.
_________________ He fights for the users.
Last edited by cloaked_wolf on Fri Jun 06, 2014 10:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Fri Jun 06, 2014 10:24 am |
|
 |
jonlumb
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:44 pm Posts: 4141 Location: Exeter
|
Seriously, the whole 1/2/3 month's salary thing is entirely a product of de Beers marketing as a way to sell more diamonds. Before they started the initial campaign, diamond rings weren't even used to signal an engagement at all.
_________________ "The woman is a riddle inside a mystery wrapped in an enigma I've had sex with."
|
Fri Jun 06, 2014 10:27 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 66 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|