Reply to topic  [ 2197 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 147  Next
Forum Film Reviews & Recommendations 
Author Message
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
okenobi wrote:
SCOTT PILGRIM [LIFTED] RULEZ.

GO NOW.
Saw it at the pictures while it was on general release. (8+)

Mark


Awesome, right?! Took a girl, and EVEN she liked it :shock:

Thanks for the recommendation Blue. Need to find time for it somewhere!


Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:30 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
Awesome, right?!
Indeedy so.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:46 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
The Other Guys

I saw Samuel L. Jackson listed as the main cast member and thought I'd give it a punt... He is killed off at the beginning, just a cameo - so you can guess, if they try and con people into the film with a big name that dies at the beginning, what the film is going to be like.

I walked out of the last Sandra Bullock film (All about Steve) I went to see after about 35 minutes. The Other Guys makes this film look like the height of film making!

It really stars Will Ferrel and Mark Wahlberg, although, in Germany, Will Gerrel is put in small type and it is advertised as a Sam Jackson and Mark Wahlberg vehicle... :?

The film was pretty much unwatchable. The opening action sequence is poor, I nearly walked out then, then there was the office scene, where Will Ferrel and Mark Wahlberg's characters are introduced, that is truly cringeworthy, and if I had been alone, I would have left then. My gilfriend turned to me after about 25 minutes and asked if we could leave.

It was a complete waste of money.

* (1 star, and that is being generous)

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Sun Oct 31, 2010 9:53 am
Profile ICQ
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
RED

No this is a bit more like it. Went with girlfriend and her youngest daughter and we all enjoyed it.

Bruce Willis plays a retiree, who is loney and rips up his pension checque each month, just as an excuse to chat to his case worker in the Bureau of Pensions. Then a death squad turns up at his house and tries to kill him, which sets him off on a trail to find out why.

The story slowly reveals his history and teams him up with former colleagues as he tries to stay one step ahead of the death squad, before taking the fight to them, a few nice twists, although they are telegraphed.

For a modern action film, it isn't bad. It makes a good romp, some typical Willis one-liners and the supporting cast is good.

***

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:54 am
Profile ICQ
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:28 pm
Posts: 851
Location: EC1 Baby!
Reply with quote
So I watched Harry Brown last night. I can't say I was particularly impressed - what with it being quite bi-polar in its efforts on the one hand to be grimey & raw but in the other well staged and shot.

I forgave its use of Adulthood's Ben Drew as a villain figure (again) simply because he does a "good" townie and suspect there's still quite a small band of "actors" who can be relied upon to deliver an honest rendition of England today's disenchanted youth... That said I found the casting of Charlie Creed-Miles as a police officer a tad-contrived given his role as Billy in Nil By Mouth, and thought it a pity they (under)used This is England's Joseph Gilgun and 24 Hour Party People's Sean Harris in such uninspiring, one-dimensional roles.


BUT, the biggest grievance I had with the film was the forever switching locations. Perhaps it's because a great many of the scenes were shot locally I found this more annoying than normal (as was the case with "Breaking and Entering") - but to be sat there knowing "where I was" one second only for the view from "that place" to be of somewhere (impossibly) elsewhere just really really got on my tits.


And I know a film's merits shouldn't rest on what it says on imdb, but they've missed out a great number of the location "goofs" and "trivias" and I'm inclined to create an account so I can correct this:
Quote:
Errors in geography: Although supposedly set in south London, most of the graffiti on the estate has been lifted straight from the New York underground scene by the movies art department, with internationally recognized American Graffiti artists such as 'Kez' and 'Skuf' and 'YKK crew' adorning the supposedly British sink estate.

Maybe so, but they also saw to include in the set "decoration" tags by EINE and ELK, who are both prolific graffiti artists in Hackney (in particular along the canal and in the surrounding De Beauvoir Town area, which is not "south London" by any stretch of the imagination). Funny thing is, I did wonder if their tags had been used with permission. :?

Anyways, Harry Brown? Meh. 2/5


Fri Dec 31, 2010 6:41 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
A touch harsh Snowy, perhaps, if geographic flexibility is your main gripe?
Trainspotting featured a cab ride from Edinburgh to a Glasgow suburb - a whole other city - but it's still a great film!

Anyway - just finished a Legally Blonde marathon with the niece.
Don't ever waste your time with the third film.
Directed by 'Savage' Steve Holland (absolutely nothing you've heard of), you'd be forgiven thinking it's a student film gone awry. Neighbours is better produced in practically every way.
Don't waste your time.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Fri Dec 31, 2010 11:22 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
I think harsh too, but I can see the basis for your criticism. I loved it.

Perhaps Gran Tourino would serve you better...?


Sat Jan 01, 2011 2:48 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:19 pm
Posts: 5071
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
500 Days of Summer


Brilliant. :)


Sat Jan 01, 2011 3:34 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
I think harsh too, but I can see the basis for your criticism. I loved it.

Perhaps Gran Tourino would serve you better...?

Gran Torino

Clint Eastwood is really (really) good in this slightly upside-down exploration of the meaning of family and community. We're used to seeing Clint as a wandering, troubled type but in this one, Clint stays stubbornly still whilst the world turns around him.

Unfortunately though, even though Clint is excellent and counting a rather good if predictable screenplay, the rather poor support casting hurt this this otherwise very well done flick. I would however be happy to watch it again.

A very watchable attitude-fest that, if you like Eastwood, is easily worth the cost of the DVD.

7/10

_________________
Jim

Image


Sat Jan 01, 2011 4:24 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
rustybucket wrote:
okenobi wrote:
I think harsh too, but I can see the basis for your criticism. I loved it.

Perhaps Gran Tourino would serve you better...?

Gran Torino

Clint Eastwood is really (really) good in this slightly upside-down exploration of the meaning of family and community. We're used to seeing Clint as a wandering, troubled type but in this one, Clint stays stubbornly still whilst the world turns around him.

Unfortunately though, even though Clint is excellent and counting a rather good if predictable screenplay, the rather poor support casting hurt this this otherwise very well done flick. I would however be happy to watch it again.

A very watchable attitude-fest that, if you like Eastwood, is easily worth the cost of the DVD.

7/10


Very fair. I completely agree, although I would probably go 7.5/8 purely for Clint's performance. I'm a fanboi.


Sat Jan 01, 2011 5:34 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
Very fair. I completely agree, although I would probably go 7.5/8 purely for Clint's performance. I'm a fanboi.

Fair enough.

I'm always stingey with the higher marks.

_________________
Jim

Image


Sat Jan 01, 2011 6:26 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Machete* - only worth a rental unless you really enjoy your schlock (or if it's £3 in Tesco lol), but awful in the very best way :D

* Saw it at my mates, so it might not be available 'commercially' yet :lol: :oops:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:26 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
I've just seen Wall•E for the first time. It's a depressing film, all things considered.
Humans are universal vermin.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sun Jan 02, 2011 4:47 pm
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Monsters is a brilliant film.
4.5 out of 5.
I may write a proper review of it.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sun Jan 02, 2011 10:39 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:29 pm
Posts: 5975
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
Monsters is a brilliant film.
4.5 out of 5.
I may write a proper review of it.

Mark


Please do, as I've heard some quite negative reviews of it. Kermode and Mayo had a very interesting interview with the director Gareth Edwards a few weeks back.

_________________
"I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet." - Stanislaw Lem


Sun Jan 02, 2011 10:43 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 2197 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 147  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.