View unanswered posts | View active topics
It is currently Mon Jun 02, 2025 7:33 pm
Atheism, Theism and related matters...
Author |
Message |
ShockWaffle
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am Posts: 1911
|

You missed my point by a mile. The motive is not relevant, but the fact that you are using science to investigate object that has motives is the entire problem. Gravity doesn't decide to let you fall because you are fat, it just does exactly what it always does. The speed of light in a vacuum is not altered by sacrifices to crocodile gods. But all these things you claim to be able to test are stuff that some deity or other can decide to give or withhold on a whim. Well the two proper sciences there can. But they cannot consider God as a function in any of that. God is an occult object, science does not look at those as it cannot. Attempting to use science to discern whether there was any divine guidance to these events is therefore hopelessly unscientific. The most you can possibly conclude is that these things CAN happen without a god, you cannot under any circumstances test whether this is what actually happened.  |  |  |  | ChurchCat wrote: We can easily check if there is any advantage to faith. Did war/slave ships sink more than christian missionary ships? for example would be a good test for checking if praying for the safe passage of missionaries is worth doing. Do christians take anti anxiety medication? would be a good test for the effect of God's peace on Christians. How many mountains move when prayed for? would be a good test for faith moving mountains. Do Christians die when you poison them? would be a good test for the claim in Mark 16 v 18 for example. (17“These signs will accompany those who have believed: in My name …18they will pick up serpents, and if they drink any deadly poison, it will not hurt them; …”) I don't see the problem. Some claims can't be tested e.g. God is love Other claims obviously can. CC |  |  |  |  |
None of those claims can be scientifically tested. Except the snake handling one which is trivial as even christians don't take that literally, except a handful of extreme nutters. If god is infinitely powerful. And if God knows all. And if God doesn't want your scientific experiment to find anything. You will find nothing. Because you are not all powerful, you are not all knowing, and none of your empirical data is beyond manipulation by a being that that does have such properties.
|
Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:23 pm |
|
 |
JJW009
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm Posts: 8767 Location: behind the sofa
|

Sociology is a science, like it or not. It's based (in part) on the same statistical mathematics used to describe gases and particles. The equations we use every day to predict for example the combustion of an air-fuel mixture in an engine, are not based on knowing the path of every single molecule in the cylinder. They are based on the statistical averages. It's not scientifically impossible for every molecule of air in the room to suddenly decide to leave. It's just incredibly unlikely. Quantum tunnelling is one an application of the incredibly unlikely. If you take a large enough sample of creatures with "free will", they can be analysed in much the same way. The results are less reliable simply because there are only a few billion people, which is many orders of magnitude less than the roughly 100,000,000,000,000 billion molecules in a single cycle of a petrol engine. However, that does not mean that sociology it is not a science. According to Hari Seldon, we are nearing the population requirement to obtain accurate long term forecasts - 50 billion. There may be no evidence for this, but it is a scientific fact.
_________________jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly." When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net
|
Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:22 am |
|
 |
l3v1ck
What's a life?
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am Posts: 12700 Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
|
It just isn't though, is it. There's nothing scientific about it. It's a religion with no factual basis, in fact it's not even that, it's a cult.
|
Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:11 am |
|
 |
JJW009
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm Posts: 8767 Location: behind the sofa
|
There's a lot of bad sociology, but I wouldn't go that far. There's a lot of bad science in general; especially spouted in the media.
_________________jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly." When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net
|
Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:36 am |
|
 |
l3v1ck
What's a life?
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am Posts: 12700 Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
|
My sincere apologies. I read that as Scientology. 
|
Wed Nov 30, 2011 4:11 am |
|
 |
JJW009
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm Posts: 8767 Location: behind the sofa
|
lol I wondered if you did, but there really is a lot of bad sociology 
_________________jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly." When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net
|
Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:05 am |
|
 |
ChurchCat
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:57 am Posts: 1652
|
Hmm, I am beginning to suspect that your knowledge of the scientific method is not as sound as you think it is. Your assertion that God actively practices deceit would upset a lot of believers who believe that God and truth are the same thing. CCNote I will acknowledge that a deceitful omnipotent entity could void the research of any investigation into anything. That does not mean that we should not seek to advance our understanding of the world using the most reliable tool we have. The scientific method.
_________________A Mac user 
|
Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:35 am |
|
 |
bobbdobbs
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm Posts: 5490 Location: just behind you!
|
I believe you are wrong. The most reliable tool we have is Alcohol. After drinking this wonder tool all problems are solved and the world is put to right. The downside is of course the hangover the next day 
_________________Finally joined Flickr
|
Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:43 am |
|
 |
ChurchCat
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:57 am Posts: 1652
|
Edited for accuracy. You have made me chuckle though. 
_________________A Mac user 
|
Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:41 pm |
|
 |
ShockWaffle
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am Posts: 1911
|

if we were discussing the quotidian transactions of ordinary science folk I would accept that criticism as I'm sure pretty much everyone here knows more about the subject than I do. But you are proposing to extend science into areas where its jurisdiction is at best contentious. That means we are discussing philosophy of science. It's not an area in which I go beyond basic adequacy, but I know my Aristotle from my Bacon and my Popper from my Carnap, and I can see quite clearly that you have no idea whatsoever. If you find that you son't understand a term I use, or feel I am using it in a different context to usual, or if you don't understand why I seem to think some apparently trivial point is bizarrely important, then ask, I am happy to explain*. * free starter; quotidian transactions is just a wanky way of saying everyday business. I fear that when I pointed out that God moves in mysterious ways you took that in some kind of Agatha Christie context. I did of course mean in the religious context: A religious truth that is incomprehensible to reason and knowable only through divine revelation This is the version of God that at least a couple of billion people believe in.He doesn't explain himself and doesn't want or expect you to know some things. It is totally compatible with these religions for God to keep secrets from you, and quite expected that he would actively evade your inspection. The only people who might have a problem with that are the snake handlers and other absolute literalists, but as mentioned already, they are a tiny and unsophisticated minority. Understand the world, fine, go ahead. But to understand religion through science is a category error. Religion does not fall into the category of objects measurable by empirical observation, and scientific method does not fall into the category of objects that can investigate metaphysics.
|
Fri Dec 02, 2011 6:46 pm |
|
 |
cloaked_wolf
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:46 pm Posts: 10022
|
For some, an interesting read: Proofs of God in a photon
_________________ He fights for the users.
|
Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:03 am |
|
 |
adidan
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:43 pm Posts: 5048
|
I told myself I wasn't going to come back in here, I haven't read it for pages, maybe when I have time on the day after the traditional Pagan Festival. Yes it does, religion is a human concept and you can make observations of humans suffering delusions. Come to think of it semantics time, 'empirical observations', a bit like saying Sahara Desert.
_________________ Fogmeister I ventured into Solitude but didn't really do much. jonbwfc I was behind her in a queue today - but I wouldn't describe it as 'bushy'.
|
Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:30 am |
|
 |
leeds_manc
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:19 pm Posts: 5071 Location: Manchester
|

 |  |  |  | The Times wrote: Children as young as 7 were among 53 people rescued from a religious school in Karachi where students were chained in a basement room equipped with hooks. Police uncovered a warren of underground rooms used to detain and punish students in the madrassa in the notorious Sohrab Goth areas of the southern port city, a no-go area for most Pakistanis let alone foreigners. The raid on Monday night exposed the brutal conditions in some of Pakistan’s unregistered madrassas, some of which feed the Taleban and other violent militant groups with their foot-soldiers. Madrassa Zakarya catered mostly for Pashtuns from the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province. Although some students claimed to have received jihadist instruction and a recent visit from an armed group of insurgents, others denied that the seminary was being used to train Islamist militants. The school’s owners say that the chains were used to restrain drug addicts. Coverage of the basement rooms, described by one official as a torture cell, has prompted disgust in Pakistan and renewed demands to clamp down on unregistered madrassas. Television pictures showed the students, about 18 of whom were under 20, led from the the seminary next to a mosque. Some were jubilant while others were clearly too traumatised to speak. One rescued youngster said that students were sometimes chained upside down and beaten with sticks while another said that he was pressured to join the Taleban. “If someone fails to get up at four in the morning, they threw cold water on him and later the principal tortured him with a bat,” 12-year-old Sher Ali said. “They also showed us CDs containing jihadi material and two weeks back a group of armed men came here and they gave us lecture on the significance and sacredness of jihad.” Mukhtiar Khaskheli, a police official, said that the school claimed that staff chained up only students who were drug addicts and that “they wanted to rehabilitate them and make them better Muslims”. But Rao Anwar, another senior police official, said: “Most of the recovered are ordinary students while a few drug addicts and mentally-challenged persons were also recovered from the basement. “It seems that the administration was running a sort of religious school-cum-rehabilitation-centre and were receiving considerable sums of money from parents of those kept in for that purpose,” he told The Times. Sharfuddin Memon, a spokesman for the home department of Sindh province, of which Karachi is the capital, said police were investigating links to militancy and that the raid had exposed an unacceptably harsh regime. “It showed the brutalised aspect of our society and our police’s effort was aimed at eradicating that element,” he said. Some of the students’ families, however, defended the madrassa director, Mufti Dawood, who has so far evaded police capture. “I admitted my son for rehabilitation because he was an addict of heroin,” the father of one boy said. “We are so happy with Mufti Dawood — he could even rehabilitate a monster.” He was paying some £50 a month to keep his son at the seminary, he said. Pakistan has more than 15,000 registered madrassas, which educate about one in 20 of the county’s children. Many more, however, operate without any oversight. |  |  |  |  |
Last edited by leeds_manc on Tue Dec 13, 2011 9:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.
|
Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:55 pm |
|
 |
leeds_manc
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:19 pm Posts: 5071 Location: Manchester
|

 |  |  |  | The Times wrote: ]The first glimpse of the Higgs boson, the elusive source of mass nicknamed the “God particle”, has been captured by the Large Hadron Collider. Two detectors at the £6 billion “big bang machine” have independently found evidence for the Higgs boson at the same energy level, offering by far the strongest indication yet that the mysterious particle really exists. The findings represent a huge advance in the hunt for the Higgs boson, the particle thought to give matter its mass, though scientists at Cern, the European particle physics laboratory near Geneva, emphasised that they have not yet made a conclusive discovery. There remains a small but appreciable chance that the spike in the data collected by both experiments could have occurred by chance. Cern plans to collect four times as much data over the coming year, which will unambiguously show whether the Higgs boson exists. A firm discovery either way should be confirmed by the end of 2012. To confirm the discovery of the Higgs, the evidence needs to have a level of statistical significance known as 5 sigma, indicating a vanishingly low probability that it could be explained by chance. A significance of 3 sigma is normally considered to be evidence for a particle’s existence. The results presented today from the LHC’s Atlas and Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) detectors have a significance of 2.3 to 2.6 sigma — enough to be a strong hint, but not enough to claim a discovery. These leave a probability of around one in 50 that the findings could be due to chance. “I think it will be extremely kind of the Higgs boson to be here,” said Fabiola Gianotti, who leads the Atlas team. “More studies and more data are needed. The next few months will be very exciting... I don’t know what the conclusions will be.” Atlas found a spike in data pointing to a mass for the Higgs of between 124 and 126 Gigaelectronvolts (GeV), a measure of energy that also indicates a particle’s mass. The significance was 2.3 sigma. It also ruled out all potential energies for the Higgs except for a range between 115.5 and 131 GeV. “This excess may be due to a fluctuation, but it could also be something more interesting,” Dr Gianotti said. “We cannot conclude anything at this stage. We need more study and more data. “Given the outstanding performance of the LHC this year, we will not need to wait long for enough data and can look forward to resolving this puzzle in 2012.” The second detector looking for the Higgs, the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS), has recorded broadly similar results in independent experiments. The bump in its data was most compatible with a Higgs with a mass of about 124 GeV, very close to the Atlas peak, with a significance of 2.6 sigma. “As of today what we see is consistent either with a background fluctuation or with the presence of the boson,” said Guido Tonelli, who leads the CMS experiment. “Refined analyses and additional data delivered in 2012 by this magnificent machine will definitely give an answer.” Claire Shepherd-Themistocleus, head of the CMS group at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in Oxfordshire, said: “We are homing in on the Higgs. We have had hints today of what its mass might be and the excitement of scientists is palpable. “Whether this is ultimately confirmed or we finally rule out a low mass Higgs boson, we are on the verge of a major change in our understanding of the fundamental nature of matter.” Professor Stephan Söldner-Rembold, head of the Particle Physics group at the University of Manchester, said: “Atlas and CMS have presented an important milestone in their search for the Higgs particle, but it is not yet sufficient for a proper discovery given the amount of data recorded so far. Still, I am very excited about it, since the quality of the LHC results is exceptional. “The Higgs particle seems to have picked itself a mass which makes things very difficult for us physicists. Everything points at a mass in the range 115-140 GeV and we concentrate on this region with our searches at the LHC and at the Tevatron. “The results indicate we are about half-way there and within one year we will probably know whether the Higgs particle exists with absolute certainty, but it is unfortunately not a Christmas present this year. The Higgs particle will, of course, be a great discovery, but it would be an even greater discovery if it didn’t exist where theory predicts it to be. “This would be a huge surprise and secretly we hope this might happen. If this is case, there must be something else that takes the role of the ‘standard’ Higgs particle, perhaps a family of several Higgs particles or something even more exotic. The unexpected is always the most exciting.” Paddy Regan, Professor of Physics at the University of Surrey, said: “The identification of the Higgs boson at Cern, if confirmed, would be the icing on the cake for the standard model of physics, which aims to explain how all the matter which make up the structure of the universe holds together and interacts. “However, what I personally find most amazing is not necessarily the mathematical beauty which predicts the existence of the Higgs boson, but the incredible 21st century technology which allows the search to be undertaken. “The Cern scientists at Atlas and the CMS try to pick out the weakest glimpses of the decays of the Higgs boson; to be able to select out these few, extra special decays from the overwhelming massive storm of residues from the multitude of other particle collisions and identify such a rare object is simply mindblowing.” Professor John Womersley, chief executive of the Science and Technology Facilities Council, which funds British particle physics and manages the UK’s subscription to Cern, said: “There is still some way to go before the existence of the Higgs boson can be confirmed or not, but excitement is mounting. “UK physicists and engineers have played a significant role in securing today’s results, and will continue to be at the forefront of exploring the new frontiers of knowledge opened by the results coming from the LHC. This is an incredibly exciting time to be involved in physics!” |  |  |  |  |
|
Tue Dec 13, 2011 9:50 pm |
|
 |
JJW009
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm Posts: 8767 Location: behind the sofa
|
Makes me want to re-subscribe to New Scientist...
Seriously - this is proper flying saucer technology we're talking about. Understanding gravity a little better could lead to who knows what?
_________________jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly." When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net
Last edited by JJW009 on Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:11 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|