Reply to topic  [ 3179 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 ... 212  Next
The Random Photo Thread 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:19 pm
Posts: 5071
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
Pleasure Beach just off shot.


Fri Sep 17, 2010 4:41 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Scotland
Reply with quote
leeds_manc wrote:
I did, unfortunately it was everything else that kind of gave the game away :p Compare and contrast:

Image


when I was at that very spot, I think thats the spot where hitler stood actually in that picture, I had photographed that tower and I had 5 lines going across the sky, 5 airliner chemtrails and it looked pretty neat :) added to the picture quite a lot IMO

_________________
Image


Fri Sep 17, 2010 8:54 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
brataccas wrote:
5 airliner chemtrails


Contrails, bratty, contrails.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Fri Sep 17, 2010 9:12 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
brataccas wrote:
5 airliner chemtrails


Contrails, bratty, contrails.


No he means it. It's conspiracy talk for chemicals dropped on us to destroy our immune systems and other nefarious purposes by the lizards in charge. Apparently the yanks experimented with it decades ago and now everybody supposedly does it.


Fri Sep 17, 2010 9:27 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
No he means it. It's conspiracy talk for chemicals dropped on us to destroy our immune systems and other nefarious purposes by the lizards in charge. Apparently the yanks experimented with it decades ago and now everybody supposedly does it.


So, in reality, contrails then.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Fri Sep 17, 2010 9:32 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
okenobi wrote:
No he means it. It's conspiracy talk for chemicals dropped on us to destroy our immune systems and other nefarious purposes by the lizards in charge. Apparently the yanks experimented with it decades ago and now everybody supposedly does it.


So, in reality, contrails then.


I'm not saying I believe it. But you have to admit, it's entirely possible and we'd have no idea.

Either way, what he said he meant to say, and therefore it's a little unreasonable to correct him IMHO.


Fri Sep 17, 2010 9:35 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
I'm not saying I believe it. But you have to admit, it's entirely possible and we'd have no idea.

Either way, what he said he meant to say, and therefore it's a little unreasonable to correct him IMHO.


Hmm. I think it's more honest to refer to them merely as trails then in that case. Or listen to the people who work in aviation, on the planes, and the understand the physics behind the effect, and call them contrails. Up to you. ;)

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Fri Sep 17, 2010 9:40 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
okenobi wrote:
I'm not saying I believe it. But you have to admit, it's entirely possible and we'd have no idea.

Either way, what he said he meant to say, and therefore it's a little unreasonable to correct him IMHO.


Hmm. I think it's more honest to refer to them merely as trails then in that case. Or listen to the people who work in aviation, on the planes, and the understand the physics behind the effect, and call them contrails. Up to you. ;)


Now, now, Alex! I don't refer to them at all, as I never need to. But I would only refer to them as chemtrails if I was discussing the possibility of such a thing.

I'm just saying the kid meant to say what he did. :)


Fri Sep 17, 2010 9:50 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Scotland
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:

I'm just saying the kid meant to say what he did. :)


oi, im older than you bitch ;)

_________________
Image


Fri Sep 17, 2010 9:52 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
NOT chemtrails. No debate needed. End.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Sat Sep 18, 2010 5:50 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
okenobi wrote:
I'm not saying I believe it. But you have to admit, it's entirely possible and we'd have no idea.

Either way, what he said he meant to say, and therefore it's a little unreasonable to correct him IMHO.


Hmm. I think it's more honest to refer to them merely as trails then in that case. Or listen to the people who work in aviation, on the planes, and the understand the physics behind the effect, and call them contrails. Up to you. ;)

Chemtrails, according to the conspiracy theorists are dropped from droplet apparatus, similar to crop spraying equipment, stuck on the wings of jets, droping specifc concoctions of chemicals to keep the population subserviant.

Chemtrails are very different from contrails, although "the government tries to hide them as contrails", but the planes tend to fly lower - otherwise the dispertion would render the chemicals useless.

Whether you believe in them or not, they are distinctly different to contrails.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Sat Sep 18, 2010 6:17 am
Profile ICQ
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
Whether you believe in them or not, they are distinctly different to contrails.


Thank you Dave. Defence rests, your honour.

And bratty, I seem to remember you being in your early twenties, no?


Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:00 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
Chemtrails, according to the conspiracy theorists are dropped from droplet apparatus, similar to crop spraying equipment, stuck on the wings of jets, droping specifc concoctions of chemicals to keep the population subserviant.

Chemtrails are very different from contrails, although "the government tries to hide them as contrails", but the planes tend to fly lower - otherwise the dispertion would render the chemicals useless.

Whether you believe in them or not, they are distinctly different to contrails.


So it would appear, were we to accept that there is a large scale program to poison the skies for reasons unknown.
Yes, there have certainly been instances of governments spraying their own people from planes to study dispersion and uptake of such a delivery method.
The true-believers of chemtrails, however, point to any airborne trail and say 'That's a chemtrail!'.

However, when presented with what is most likely the contrails left by regular, scheduled flights in and out of a nearby airport, to claim 'chemtrails' when contrails are more likely is like claiming to see alien craft resembling a Boeing 737 when you live near Luton Airport. There may or may not be an alien craft that looks like a 737, but the chances are it's EasyJet.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:49 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
One for Ernie … clicky

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:41 pm
Profile WWW
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
One for Ernie … clicky

Mark


:lol:

It's something to aspire to :D

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:07 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 3179 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 ... 212  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.