Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Housing benefit going to bad landlords 
Author Message
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
http://news.bbc.co.uk/panorama/hi/front ... 122529.stm

Quote:
Reporter John Sweeney discovers that by one estimate housing benefit money totalling as much as £3.5bn a year is going to private landlords deemed bad or neglectful.
In his analysis, Sweeney says the result is that some of Britain's poor are now living in 21st century slums.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Oct 26, 2010 11:06 am
Profile
Official forum cat lady
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:04 am
Posts: 11039
Location: London
Reply with quote
Don't get me started. Councils are dishing out tons of money and not even checking where it's going to. How do I know? I'm involved in a housing benefit fraud case myself. In 3 years the council did not once check that the tenant was living where he said he was living. If that was a private company it would be a different matter completely.

_________________
Still the official cheeky one ;)

jonbwfc wrote:
Caz is correct though


Tue Oct 26, 2010 11:21 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
oceanicitl wrote:
Don't get me started. Councils are dishing out tons of money and not even checking where it's going to. How do I know? I'm involved in a housing benefit fraud case myself. In 3 years the council did not once check that the tenant was living where he said he was living. If that was a private company it would be a different matter completely.

There are so many things going wrong. Council tenants never see the money directly from housing benefit. It is done internally if you are on housing benefit. Some unscrupulous private landlords do fiddle the system. There was a case more than a decade ago in London where the landlord was claiming housing benefit for more people than the properties could legally occupy. None were living there. Then you get landlords who basically are slum landlords like the ones in the Panorama program, who simply look at benefit claimants as people who can be fleeced easily. If properties were seized that were in a bad state there would be a short crisis but the councils could repair them and put their highest needs people into them. Banks and building societies might moan but they might also demand much higher deposits from buy to let landlords so that the landlord has much more at stake. They could also demand annual inspections to maintain the property is well maintained.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Oct 26, 2010 11:48 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 3 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.