Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
LED bulb question 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
I've just had the reverse light on the car blow - so I'm thinking of sticking in LEDs to replace the bulb.
While I've got the housing off, I thought I might as well do the others - but here's the thing:

Should I stick a red LED bulb in for the brake/side lights when the lens cover is already red, or would a white LED do just as well?
Would the red LED be bright enough behind the red lens?
The bulbs themselves have no colouring, of course, so I thought a white LED would be ok, but now I have doubt.

Any thoughts?

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:51 am
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
I reckon white would be ideal - unless there is a crack in the cover and you are going to fail the test on it without a red source.

Is there a price difference??

_________________
Image


Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:01 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
It makes more sense to use red, from a purely scientific perspective.

White LEDs work by having a Blue LED coated in a phosphorescent powder which converts the blue light into white, a bit like a fluorescent tube. The red filter on the brake cluster then blocks all the light that isn't red. The efficiency losses are high.

Red LEDs emit red light which goes through the red filter. Losses are low.

Of course, it totally depends on what you can actually buy!

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:38 am
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
A red LED would also mean that if you lost the cover you would still be legal as far as your brake lights.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:38 am
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
Personally, I've had nothing but issues with LED replacements. So now I just stick with uprated fronts and boggo rears.


Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:42 am
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:57 am
Posts: 1652
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
Personally, I've had nothing but issues with LED replacements. So now I just stick with uprated fronts and boggo rears.



"boggo"?

:?

_________________
A Mac user Image


Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:28 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
ChurchCat wrote:
okenobi wrote:
Personally, I've had nothing but issues with LED replacements. So now I just stick with uprated fronts and boggo rears.



"boggo"?

:?

Bog standard, perhaps? Not sure.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:28 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
EddArmitage wrote:
Bog standard, perhaps?


Correct. It would appear my colloquialisms are not fairing too well of late.


Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:14 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
EddArmitage wrote:
Bog standard, perhaps?
Correct. It would appear my colloquialisms are not fairing too well of late.
I got the 'boggo' meaning. (8+)

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:20 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
okenobi wrote:
EddArmitage wrote:
Bog standard, perhaps?
Correct. It would appear my colloquialisms are not fairing too well of late.
I got the 'boggo' meaning. (8+)

I did too, but then I started questioning my intuition.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:35 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
EddArmitage wrote:
I started questioning my intuition.
N00b.
I knew you were correct in your original assumption, Edd.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:37 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
I like to upgrade the fronts (fully legal but some idiots still flash thinking I've got full beam on) but use 'boggo' bulbs on the back too.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:51 pm
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:57 am
Posts: 1652
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
EddArmitage wrote:
Bog standard, perhaps?


Correct. It would appear my colloquialisms are not fairing too well of late.



You young kids with your hip talkin'

:roll:

_________________
A Mac user Image


Thu Jan 20, 2011 3:13 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
veato wrote:
I like to upgrade the fronts (fully legal but some idiots still flash thinking I've got full beam on) but use 'boggo' bulbs on the back too.


It totally makes sense.

ChurchCat wrote:
okenobi wrote:
EddArmitage wrote:
Bog standard, perhaps?


Correct. It would appear my colloquialisms are not fairing too well of late.



You young kids with your hip talkin'

:roll:


Innit.


Thu Jan 20, 2011 3:38 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm
Posts: 5150
Location: /dev/tty0
Reply with quote
veato wrote:
I like to upgrade the fronts (fully legal but some idiots still flash thinking I've got full beam on) but use 'boggo' bulbs on the back too.


Do you set them low so they don't shine in other drivers faces? The problem I've seen is that people don't have their full beams on (you can see they switch as they come round the corner) but have the headlights angled way too high...


Thu Jan 20, 2011 3:50 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.