x404.co.uk http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/ |
|
48÷2(9+3) http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=13444 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | cloaked_wolf [ Sun Apr 24, 2011 9:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | 48÷2(9+3) |
Calculate the answer to 48÷2(9+3) What do you get? |
Author: | jonbwfc [ Sun Apr 24, 2011 9:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 48÷2(9+3) |
Does nobody learn BODMAS these days? Besides, when I was doing maths, you'd have got shouted at for missing the multiplication symbol, even though it's implied. Jon |
Author: | leeds_manc [ Sun Apr 24, 2011 9:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 48÷2(9+3) |
48 It strikes me that I've forgotten what takes priority, ok here goes again. I get 2. :edit: isn't it obviously 2? Why would you get the other figure? |
Author: | Paul1965 [ Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 48÷2(9+3) |
![]() |
Author: | timark_uk [ Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 48÷2(9+3) |
36. (Do I get the cool QI FAIL klaxon?) Mark |
Author: | Spreadie [ Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 48÷2(9+3) |
Surely it would be 48÷(2(9+3))=2 48÷2(9+3) would work out as 48÷2x12 = 288 |
Author: | ProfessorF [ Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 48÷2(9+3) |
I read that as 24x12. |
Author: | cloaked_wolf [ Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:25 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: 48÷2(9+3) | |||||||||
No. You get locked in the cupboard with Jo Brandt for fifteen minutes. ![]() |
Author: | JJW009 [ Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 48÷2(9+3) |
If you'd written 48 ÷ 2 x (9+3) then I'd have said 288 If you'd written 48 / 2 * (9+3) I'd have said 288 If you'd written 48 / 2(9+3) I'd have said 2 because I'd have taken the entire second half to be underneath. Without the multiplication sign, I read the 2(9+3) as a single item. However, I'd never mix the 'rithmetic convention of "times" and "divide" signs with the more algebraic convention of never using them at all. Seriously; when did you ever see a ÷ in anything past high school? I voted for 2 because there wasn't a "slap the teacher" option. |
Author: | cloaked_wolf [ Sun Apr 24, 2011 11:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 48÷2(9+3) |
This was all taken off another forum and it was interesting to see what peoples' interpretation of the question was. |
Author: | JJW009 [ Mon Apr 25, 2011 12:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 48÷2(9+3) |
Found this after you said you'd seen the exact question elsewhere: http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/48293 The important extracts are that: multiplication and division hold equal precedence and many calculators and textbooks state that a higher value of precedence should be placed on implied multiplication than on explicit multiplication The problem really is the bad form of the question. |
Author: | JJW009 [ Mon Apr 25, 2011 12:57 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: 48÷2(9+3) | ||||||||||||||||||
Read this from Wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations |
Author: | MrStevenRogers [ Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:27 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: 48÷2(9+3) | |||||||||
ditto ... |
Author: | leeds_manc [ Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 48÷2(9+3) |
I was taught BPODMAS ![]() |
Author: | l3v1ck [ Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:17 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: 48÷2(9+3) | |||||||||
+1 I know there are rules on these things (which I'm not 100% sure of), but I always add enough brackets to make it perfectly clear when I write formulas. For that I'd have written: (48÷2)(9+3) |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |