Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Hollywood 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Ok so how do you class a movie as being a typical Hollywood movie? What factors are considered etc?

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Fri May 27, 2011 12:48 pm
Profile
Official forum cat lady
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:04 am
Posts: 11039
Location: London
Reply with quote
Commercial crap usually based on a super hero

_________________
Still the official cheeky one ;)

jonbwfc wrote:
Caz is correct though


Fri May 27, 2011 1:41 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:29 pm
Posts: 5975
Reply with quote
Big budget; aimed at 9 year old kid's mental level; edited by someone with ADHD for an audience with very short attention span; over-reliance on SPFX spectacle over content; cliché-ridden dialogue; loud and dumb.

_________________
"I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet." - Stanislaw Lem


Fri May 27, 2011 2:11 pm
Profile
Official forum cat lady
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:04 am
Posts: 11039
Location: London
Reply with quote
Paul1965 wrote:
Big budget; aimed at 9 year old kid's mental level; edited by someone with ADHD for an audience with very short attention span; over-reliance on SPFX spectacle over content; cliché-ridden dialogue; loud and dumb.


So you're a fan too lol

_________________
Still the official cheeky one ;)

jonbwfc wrote:
Caz is correct though


Fri May 27, 2011 2:14 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Paul1965 wrote:
Big budget; aimed at 9 year old kid's mental level; edited by someone with ADHD for an audience with very short attention span; over-reliance on SPFX spectacle over content; cliché-ridden dialogue; loud and dumb.
Transformers.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri May 27, 2011 2:19 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
Must. Resist.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Fri May 27, 2011 2:23 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
EddArmitage wrote:
Must. Resist.
Why?

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri May 27, 2011 2:55 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
I think Megan Fox might have drifted across his mind...


Fri May 27, 2011 3:01 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
There's a picture (well. screenshot) I'd like post here, but I can't find it on Google.
Anyone who's seen 1941 might now the bit I mean. :ugeek:

EDIT

Found it:
Image

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Fri May 27, 2011 3:23 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
I'm more thinking along the lines that many films are not filmed in Hollywood, yet are given the name. Is this because of distributors, production, crew, stars or otherwise? Perhaps it's just a generic term for American films as Bollywood is for Indian movies.

I've seen A Clockwork Orange referred to as a Holywood film yet it was set and filmed in the UK and had British and Irish actors. Even the director Stanley Kubrick, although American, had lived in the UK for 10 years before filming commenced and would do so until the time of his death. The only American thing about it would appear to be WB.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Fri May 27, 2011 4:25 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
I would never say that A Clockwork Orange was a Hollywood film.
I think the person that did that clearly doesn't know what they were talking about in that instance.
I think the term 'Hollywood film' is just becoming a catch-all term, as you stated above, Matt.
It's influence is so pervasive it can't really be understated. It's as much a product of what it is as what it isn't, which is where Bollywood and European (or art-house) cinema comes in.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri May 27, 2011 5:28 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
I think 'Hollywood' is just more or less synonymous with 'popular'.
There's a hint of inverted snobbery about it as well.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Fri May 27, 2011 5:46 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
There's a hint of inverted snobbery about it as well.
I see what you did there.
*laugh*

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri May 27, 2011 6:10 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
I think the term 'Hollywood film' is just becoming a catch-all term, as you stated above, Matt.


Looking at it a little more I tend to agree, and Hollywood film on wiki redirects to Cinema of the United States.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sat May 28, 2011 4:15 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 14 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.