Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Women getting ripped off 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://tinyurl.com/hhrft75

Sort it out, love. Joke, joke... Though I have to say, the amount of women I know who'll crow 'these were 50% off!' etc, the results don't really surprise me.

And it's not like she won't bloody steal your razor anyway ;)

No, seriously ladies, have you noticed what they're talking about there? Maybe you just buy the 'bloke stuff'?

EDIT - A rogue character or whatever meant I had to adjust the title and link...

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Tue Jan 19, 2016 9:58 pm
Profile
Official forum cat lady
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:04 am
Posts: 11039
Location: London
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/hhrft75

Sort it out, love. Joke, joke... Though I have to say, the amount of women I know who'll crow 'these were 50% off!' etc, the results don't really surprise me.

And it's not like she won't bloody steal your razor anyway ;)

No, seriously ladies, have you noticed what they're talking about there? Maybe you just buy the 'bloke stuff'?

EDIT - A rogue character or whatever meant I had to adjust the title and link...


Don't need a dodgy graudain article to know this. Women purchase more than men so of course we do.

_________________
Still the official cheeky one ;)

jonbwfc wrote:
Caz is correct though


Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:34 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
There's a fundamental principle here which is this - "Charge what the market will bear." Women get charged more because they've been willing to pay more. The cosmetics & fashion industries are basically run on this idea. There are certain goods I heard listed in a news report on this that are gender-specific - for example, Levi's jeans are cut differently for men and women so you might expect some variation there - but there's no reason on God's earth to pay more for a child's scooter just because it's painted pink.

This is not sexism per se - They're not putting the price up because they're for women, they're putting the price up because women seem (or at least seemed) happy to pay more for products that are marketed this way. It's basically a tax on naivety, not gender.

Stop buying the silly marketed stuff and buy the cheap 'non gender specific' alternatives where possible and it'll stop happening. It's that simple.


Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:38 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am
Posts: 6954
Location: Peebo
Reply with quote
Linked article - clickety

This bit very nearly made me :lol:

Quote:
For men, razors have traditionally been marketed as a utilitarian tool. They’ll get rid of your inconvenient facial hair efficiently so you are presentable for your office job. High-priced blades are justified in terms of microscopic leaps in precision. A recent Gillette campaign, for example, promised that the new blades “cut each whisker 23 microns shorter”.

When it comes to female razors, however, what you’re buying is that you won’t die alone with cats. Failing to remove your body hair, advertising tells women, will make you a disgusting pariah.


Own emphasis added.

_________________
When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum.
-Billy Connolly (to a heckler)


Wed Jan 20, 2016 12:24 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
My wife uses men's razors - at least I hope so! :lol: :oops:

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Wed Jan 20, 2016 12:29 pm
Profile ICQ
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:06 pm
Posts: 6355
Location: IoW
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
My wife uses men's razors - at least I hope so! :lol: :oops:


I can usually tell when my wife uses men's razors - my face gets ripped to shreds the next time I have a shave.

_________________
Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!


Wed Jan 20, 2016 12:55 pm
Profile
Officially Mrs saspro
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:55 pm
Posts: 4955
Location: on the naughty step
Reply with quote
I check both men and women sections and buy whatever's cheapest.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Wed Jan 20, 2016 1:55 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
davrosG5 wrote:
Quote:
For men, razors have traditionally been marketed as a utilitarian tool. They’ll get rid of your inconvenient facial hair efficiently so you are presentable for your office job. High-priced blades are justified in terms of microscopic leaps in precision. A recent Gillette campaign, for example, promised that the new blades “cut each whisker 23 microns shorter”.


This is, I think, only partly true. It's probably true that men are more likely to accept a piece of 'quantitative' marketing in that way, but that's certainly not the only form of marketing men's razor ads use. Almost inevitably the ad script goes something like this -

1) Picture of new razor rotating with added on gleam and lens flare - implication : 'Look how shiny and new it is !'
2) Video of male model shaving with new razor - implication : 'if you shave with this razor you'll be as handsome as this guy!'
3) Another picture of razor rotating in some fashion with more lens flare and voice-over with some ludicrous quantitative claim - 'Look how shiny and new and 23.5% better it is!'
4) Man finishes shave and rinses off/ dries face with towel and as he does so attractive female model walks into shot, smiles and strokes his newly shaved chin - implication : 'If you shave with this razor, women who look like this will want to sleep with you!'

OK, the message is positive - 'using this thing will make you more attractive' - rather than negative - 'not using this thing will make you less attractive' - but the basic fact is simple : quite a lot of cosmetic and grooming products are sold on the implication of sex, to both genders. Some are more blatant than others *cough* lynx deoderant *cough* but it's pretty much there in all of it.

The one thing male cosmetics/grooming ads don't have yet is the whole ageist thing - 'If you buy this product it will make you look younger!'. I suspect that's because the current older generation (say 50+) of men are still fairly undoctrinated about cosmetics & etc in the main. As the current 20-somethings who have been exposed to male-centric cosmetics advertising since pre-puberty grow older, we'll see more of that particularly unwelcome form of emotional blackmail in men's cosmetics too. We get it a bit with things like male grey hair dye, but not to anything like the degree it's battered into women's heads every day.


Wed Jan 20, 2016 2:01 pm
Profile
Official forum cat lady
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:04 am
Posts: 11039
Location: London
Reply with quote
Baby cotton wool pads are cheaper than the ones they put in the adult section

_________________
Still the official cheeky one ;)

jonbwfc wrote:
Caz is correct though


Wed Jan 20, 2016 2:32 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
oceanicitl wrote:
Baby cotton wool pads are cheaper than the ones they put in the adult section

Possibly a VAT thing?


Wed Jan 20, 2016 2:54 pm
Profile
Official forum cat lady
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:04 am
Posts: 11039
Location: London
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
oceanicitl wrote:
Baby cotton wool pads are cheaper than the ones they put in the adult section

Possibly a VAT thing?


Whatever thing it is it's a rip off

_________________
Still the official cheeky one ;)

jonbwfc wrote:
Caz is correct though


Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:25 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
This is appropriate.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:37 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:


Nearly posted that myself :)

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Wed Jan 20, 2016 6:01 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Best comment I've seen on the coverage

Quote:
It's true. I just checked Amazon.
The average price for CDs by Pink is £6.52.
Average for Blue CDs - £5.04.
A definite conspiracy.


Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:18 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
Best comment I've seen on the coverage

Quote:
It's true. I just checked Amazon.
The average price for CDs by Pink is £6.52.
Average for Blue CDs - £5.04.
A definite conspiracy.


:lol:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:22 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.