Reply to topic  [ 925 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 ... 62  Next
The Star Wars thread 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Star Wars: interesting 1977 interview with Alec Guinness | Den of Geek
http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/star-wa ... c-guinness

8-)

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Tue Jan 19, 2016 6:12 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Disney claims December 2017 as new Official release date of Ep. VIII gets pushed back.
So this, together with Rogue One getting released this December, it seems that Disney really wants the end-of-year cinema-going boxoffice moolah.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Wed Jan 20, 2016 9:09 pm
Profile WWW
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
Disney claims December 2017 as new Official release date of Ep. VIII gets pushed back.
So this, together with Rogue One getting released this December, it seems that Disney really wants the end-of-year cinema-going boxoffice moolah.

Mark


Yeah, gotta love those toy sales.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:12 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Luke Skywalker’s blaster from The Empire Strikes Back goes on sale for $300,000 | GamesRadar
http://www.gamesradar.com/luke-skywalke ... le-300000/

That kid must be raging about all sorts of things :o

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:41 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:29 pm
Posts: 5975
Reply with quote
Man Makes Awesome Lightsaber 8-) 8-) 8-)

_________________
"I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet." - Stanislaw Lem


Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:20 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Why a Live-Action STAR WARS TV Show Doesn't Seem Likely — Latino-Review.com
http://www.latino-review.com/news/why-a ... eem-likely

If the suggestion of Disney creating their own streaming service is true, my guess is that's when you'd see it.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:33 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
Why a Live-Action STAR WARS TV Show Doesn't Seem Likely — Latino-Review.com
http://www.latino-review.com/news/why-a ... eem-likely

If the suggestion of Disney creating their own streaming service is true, my guess is that's when you'd see it.
I think what the article says at the end is likely the main reason 'the Marvel disconnect between the TV and the films'.
While we, the viewers, know that the TV shows and films exist in the same shared world, neither one actually makes that strong a reference to the other, for whatever reason.
The closest we have come to this is shared characters, Coulson and Sif being prime examples.
I guess they need to remain distinct from each-other enough to justify their place on whichever medium they currently inhabit.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Jan 23, 2016 2:08 am
Profile WWW
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
pcernie wrote:
Why a Live-Action STAR WARS TV Show Doesn't Seem Likely — Latino-Review.com
http://www.latino-review.com/news/why-a ... eem-likely

If the suggestion of Disney creating their own streaming service is true, my guess is that's when you'd see it.
I think what the article says at the end is likely the main reason 'the Marvel disconnect between the TV and the films'.
While we, the viewers, know that the TV shows and films exist in the same shared world, neither one actually makes that strong a reference to the other, for whatever reason.
The closest we have come to this is shared characters, Coulson and Sif being prime examples.
I guess they need to remain distinct from each-other enough to justify their place on whichever medium they currently inhabit.

Mark


I dunno, something makes me think even the cartoons are in continuity, but I haven't checked and I'm going to bed lol.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Jan 23, 2016 2:13 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
timark_uk wrote:
pcernie wrote:
Why a Live-Action STAR WARS TV Show Doesn't Seem Likely — Latino-Review.com
http://www.latino-review.com/news/why-a ... eem-likely

If the suggestion of Disney creating their own streaming service is true, my guess is that's when you'd see it.
I think what the article says at the end is likely the main reason 'the Marvel disconnect between the TV and the films'.
While we, the viewers, know that the TV shows and films exist in the same shared world, neither one actually makes that strong a reference to the other, for whatever reason.
The closest we have come to this is shared characters, Coulson and Sif being prime examples.
I guess they need to remain distinct from each-other enough to justify their place on whichever medium they currently inhabit.
I dunno, something makes me think even the cartoons are in continuity, but I haven't checked and I'm going to bed lol.
For Star Wars?
As far as I'm aware, pretty much all expanded universe stuff was jettisoned from the film continuity, so there's the films, and then there's the rest of the stuff (expanded universe).
If Disney wanted a live-action Star Wars TV show, they'd need to decide which camp to place it in.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Jan 23, 2016 2:16 am
Profile WWW
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Just checked, apparently Clone Wars the cartoon is canon with the films

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Canon

It's still all a bit confusing though, as apparently cartoon Clone Wars only keeps some of the stuff from the novels etc that were considered canon and ditches the rest. And even some of the novels and so on are questionable as of recently :roll:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:01 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
Just checked, apparently Clone Wars the cartoon is canon with the films

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Canon

It's still all a bit confusing though
This complicates things if they want to make a live-action TV show.
Not that I think that will actually happen before Ep. IX is released.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:43 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
Just checked, apparently Clone Wars the cartoon is canon with the films

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Canon

It's still all a bit confusing though, as apparently cartoon Clone Wars only keeps some of the stuff from the novels etc that were considered canon and ditches the rest. And even some of the novels and so on are questionable as of recently :roll:

The recent Clone Wars, or the Tartakovsky ones?

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:20 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:29 pm
Posts: 5975
Reply with quote
So the Star Wars Holiday Special (1978) really is as bad as they say. I've had to give up at the 8 minute mark.

_________________
"I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet." - Stanislaw Lem


Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:14 am
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
pcernie wrote:
Just checked, apparently Clone Wars the cartoon is canon with the films

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Canon

It's still all a bit confusing though, as apparently cartoon Clone Wars only keeps some of the stuff from the novels etc that were considered canon and ditches the rest. And even some of the novels and so on are questionable as of recently :roll:

The recent Clone Wars, or the Tartakovsky ones?


Now I'm even more confused :oops:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Jan 24, 2016 1:05 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
paulzolo wrote:
pcernie wrote:
Just checked, apparently Clone Wars the cartoon is canon with the films
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Canon
It's still all a bit confusing though, as apparently cartoon Clone Wars only keeps some of the stuff from the novels etc that were considered canon and ditches the rest. And even some of the novels and so on are questionable as of recently :roll:

The recent Clone Wars, or the Tartakovsky ones?

Now I'm even more confused :oops:

Tartakovsky made two (IIRC) long form 'clone wars' period cartoons. The story threads of those shows were then picked up by another party who made the successful 'clone wars' CGI TV series which I think ran for five seasons. TBH I'm not sure why you'd consider one canon and one not - they follow the same characters in the same period and they're very consistent with each other.


Sun Jan 24, 2016 2:09 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 925 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 ... 62  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 188 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.