x404.co.uk
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/

The Star Wars thread
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=4522		 Page 59 of 62
Author:  timark_uk [ Fri Dec 16, 2016 7:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Star Wars thread
oceanicitl wrote:
Stormtroopers on the Jubilee line this morning
They've been getting around this week.

Mark
Author:  Paul1965 [ Mon Dec 19, 2016 10:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Star Wars thread
Waiting for roadside assistance.
Author:  oceanicitl [ Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Star Wars thread
Debbie and Carrie to be buried together on Friday :cry:
Author:  paulzolo [ Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Star Wars thread
Without divulging too much (so SPOILERS) there are a couple of CGI characters in Rogue One which seemed to be just a few degrees “off”. The one at the end of the film seemed to, err, m glow to much. I’m not sure what the correct setting in your rendering software is called, but from my limited experience with Poser, it felt like sub surface scattering (calculating how light behaves in skin) had been over cranked.

Apart from that, a pretty decent film, I felt. It had the edge on The Force Awakens, and some nice familiar bits from the original trilogy to keep fans happy.
Author:  hifidelity2 [ Thu Jan 05, 2017 8:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Star Wars thread
We (myself and SWMBO) went and saw it the other night - both enjoyed it and it was a good linking story between the 2 series

The only think I think they missed was calling it "Project Bothan" as in the quote from the original film - "Many Bothans died to bring us this information."
Author:  pcernie [ Thu Jan 05, 2017 11:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Star Wars thread
http://sciencefiction.com/2017/01/03/ga ... snt-movie/

You'd think the first thing the company would do is digitise everything, wouldn't you? Out of sheer paranoia if nothing else...
Author:  oceanicitl [ Thu Jan 05, 2017 1:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Star Wars thread
pcernie wrote:
http://sciencefiction.com/2017/01/03/gareth-edwards-explains-tie-fighter-rogue-one-trailer-isnt-movie/

You'd think the first thing the company would do is digitise everything, wouldn't you? Out of sheer paranoia if nothing else...


Spoilers? Some people haven't seen the film :)
Author:  pcernie [ Thu Jan 05, 2017 2:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Star Wars thread
oceanicitl wrote:
pcernie wrote:
http://sciencefiction.com/2017/01/03/gareth-edwards-explains-tie-fighter-rogue-one-trailer-isnt-movie/

You'd think the first thing the company would do is digitise everything, wouldn't you? Out of sheer paranoia if nothing else...


Spoilers? Some people haven't seen the film :)


I figured people here would know from the title of the article, but I'll keep it in mind in future.
Author:  oceanicitl [ Thu Jan 05, 2017 2:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Star Wars thread
pcernie wrote:
oceanicitl wrote:
pcernie wrote:
http://sciencefiction.com/2017/01/03/gareth-edwards-explains-tie-fighter-rogue-one-trailer-isnt-movie/

You'd think the first thing the company would do is digitise everything, wouldn't you? Out of sheer paranoia if nothing else...


Spoilers? Some people haven't seen the film :)


I figured people here would know from the title of the article, but I'll keep it in mind in future.


I might be going to see it at the weekend
Author:  pcernie [ Thu Jan 05, 2017 2:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Star Wars thread
I liked it and I'm not a massive SW fan.
Author:  oceanicitl [ Thu Jan 05, 2017 2:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Star Wars thread
pcernie wrote:
I liked it and I'm not a massive SW fan.


Yeah the general consensus is it's good. It may be worth my annual trek to the cinema for this one.
Author:  Spreadie [ Thu Jan 05, 2017 7:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Star Wars thread
I took the boys to see it on xmas eve. Really enjoyed it - more so than Ep VII.

There were a couple of things that irked me, but the only real annoyance was the CG on a couple of characters - not so much much the second one for obvious reasons, but I found the first really distracting, and entirely unnecessary.
Author:  timark_uk [ Sat Jan 07, 2017 2:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Star Wars thread
What do you do when an actor in a beloved and integral decades old role has a major part in your next film that they have completed principal photography on and an even bigger role in the film after that which hasn't started production yet, dies?

Right now I would not like to be in the shoes of either Kathleen Kennedy or Colin Trevorrow.
Both of which have very tough decisions to make whilst still grieving.

Mark
Author:  paulzolo [ Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Star Wars thread
timark_uk wrote:
What do you do when an actor in a beloved and integral decades old role has a major part in your next film that they have completed principal photography on and an even bigger role in the film after that which hasn't started production yet, dies?

Right now I would not like to be in the shoes of either Kathleen Kennedy or Colin Trevorrow.
Both of which have very tough decisions to make whilst still grieving.

Mark


They do have a CGI model, and as long as it doesn’t look like there’s a 100 watt lightbulb inside it ...
Author:  davrosG5 [ Mon Jan 09, 2017 4:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Star Wars thread
paulzolo wrote:
They do have a CGI model, and as long as it doesn’t look like there’s a 100 watt lightbulb inside it ...

On the evidence so far, this doesn't look too good. Hopefully they can find a dimmer switch or something.

Saw Rogue One last night. Really enjoyed it although I could kind of see where some of the online criticism has come from about the lack of character development in a number of cases.
On the plus side, the space battles were good and we must be up to double figures of women who can talk in the SW universe now as well.
Page 59 of 62 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/