Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
What would you change about YouTube? 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Quote:
YouTube has announced that it will start to roll out changes to the site, stating that it is time for 'spring cleaning' at the start of the new decade.

The online video site is the most popular of its kind on the planet, and owners Google are keen to begin to turn audience into profit.

The YouTube blog indicates that some features will be dropped, others altered and new ones arriving.

Upcoming fifth anniversary

"The excitement of the new decade and our upcoming fifth anniversary has the YouTube team itching to make the site experience better than ever before," says Margaret Stewart - YouTube's User Experience Manager.

"We have all kinds of ideas about new things we could build and launch, but we are also taking some significant time in the coming months to do some early "spring cleaning" on the site design and user experience.

"What will this mean to you? Well, it means you'll see some things about the site design evolving to be more consistent across the site. And some things that haven't worked as smoothly as we would have liked them to will get the attention they deserve.

"Lastly, we may determine that some things we tried out just didn't fly and remove them from the site."

Feedback

The site asks for user feedback on what should change with other 2,000 changes already suggested on the feedback page.

"We'll be using a number of inputs to build our "to do" list: usage data that shows the things you use the most versus things that very few people use; usability testing that can help us understand what's broken that needs fixing; and, last but not least, we'd like to hear from you directly...

"What would you want to see fixed on the site? What would you remove completely, if you could?

"We'll use your feedback to help prioritise what we focus on, so we can all experience a cleaner, easier-to-use YouTube.

"We'll take a few weeks to digest your comments and will respond directly to the ideas you're most excited about."


http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/ ... ng--663287

I'm kinda wondering if the comments on vids could be improved in some way, or even removed altogether - am I the only person that rarely if ever reads them, cos of the prats that use them for arguments? :?

I'd sooner more of the vid's description was visible than the comments if it came down to it... Can't remember what you call it (Feather?), but I'm using the 'light' version of YT at the mo, loads vids a lot quicker :D

So, what would you want changed?

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:02 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
I'd stop it from playing the videos automatically.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:37 pm
Profile WWW
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:33 pm
Posts: 491
Location: UK, England.
Reply with quote
Those bloody adverts that are not useful in the slightest. I wouldn't mind so much if they were mildy reputable e.g. Dixons, Microsoft, Shell, BMW etc etc etc not bloody cartoon yourself!

Were we meant to make realistic suggestions?

Hobgob.

_________________
Twitter: AdamW89
Flickr: The Hobgob

Nietzsche wrote:
Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.


Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:43 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
So, what would you want changed?

The errors I'm currently getting while trying to upload videos. I tried one yesterday in HD and as WMV. Neither got past a quarter of the way before the upload crashed.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Sun Jan 17, 2010 7:53 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
The errors I'm currently getting while trying to upload videos. I tried one yesterday in HD and as WMV. Neither got past a quarter of the way before the upload crashed.


+1

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sun Jan 17, 2010 9:19 am
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 4876
Location: Newcastle
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
I'd stop it from playing the videos automatically.

Mark


+1

On a slow connection it's the last thing I want, I'd rather it buffered first or at least a decent amount before playing.... and to give me an option

_________________
Twitter
Charlie Brooker:
Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.


Sun Jan 17, 2010 1:47 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 6 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.