x404.co.uk
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/

Old ***RESULTS***
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6147		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  onemac [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Old ***RESULTS***
Bit of a topsy turvy one this month with several of the regulars unable to submit. Mia Culpa.

Anyway, congratulations go to ProfessorF who hasn't won the piccy comp for a whole 31 days... :roll: Well done Alex - I hope you kept that list of topics I sent you last month??? :lol: :lol: :lol:

1. History - 28pts - ProfessorF

2. Vintage - 27pts - belchingmatt

3. The Guardian - 22pts - nvj1662

4. Ask your Grandad - 13pts - HeatherKay
5. left to rot - 12pts - brataccas
6. Made for... - 11pts - timark_uk
7. Old habits - 9pts - Spreadie
8. 380-362BC - 6pts - Zippy
9. Progress ? - 3pts - rustybucket
10. How Old? - 2pts - davrosG5
11= Recycled - 1pt - TheFrenchun
11= Industrial - 1pt - bobbdobbs

Well done to all those who submitted and 'come on all you slackers' to those who didn't :D This months topic will be with you shortly.......

Al
Author:  Spreadie [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Old ***RESULTS***
Well done Prof, a deserving win.

Now pull yer finger out and choose a topic. ;)
Author:  ProfessorF [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Old ***RESULTS***
Spreadie wrote:
Well done Prof, a deserving win.

Now pull yer finger out and choose a topic. ;)


Already sent Al a PM before you posted that. ;)

Cheers though. :)
Author:  onemac [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Old ***RESULTS***
Spreadie wrote:
Now pull yer finger out and choose a topic. ;)

He has - wait for it...........

Al
Author:  HeatherKay [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Old ***RESULTS***
Yay! Well done, Alex.

Can't wait for the next topic to see if we can't knock you off your pinnacle! ;)
Author:  ProfessorF [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Old ***RESULTS***
I think I have you to thank for that extra 1pt Heather!
Otherwise, wouldn't we have had a joint 1st place? :shock:
Good round though.
Author:  nvj1662 [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Old ***RESULTS***
Congratulations again Alex! Keep 'em coming. :)
Author:  belchingmatt [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Old ***RESULTS***
ProfessorF wrote:
I think I have you to thank for that extra 1pt Heather!
Otherwise, wouldn't we have had a joint 1st place? :shock:
Good round though.


Grrr. ;)

Always the bridesmaid, never the bride. :P
Author:  Spreadie [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Old ***RESULTS***
ProfessorF wrote:
Spreadie wrote:
Well done Prof, a deserving win.

Now pull yer finger out and choose a topic. ;)


Already sent Al a PM before you posted that. ;)

onemac wrote:
The topic for February is... ***ABSTRACT***

:shock: :shock: :shock: :?

Ok, now pull yer finger out and choose a different topic. :lol:
Author:  onemac [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Old ***RESULTS***
belchingmatt wrote:
Grrr. ;)

Always the bridesmaid, never the bride. :P

A tad better than last month I believe ;) ;)

Al
Author:  brataccas [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Old ***RESULTS***
veato wrote:
Was there much post processing?


:lol:

spreadie wrote:
1) Left to rot - I'm not getting into any debate about processing, I just think it looks incredible.


:lol: :lol:

veato wrote:
When the voting is over could the person who took this let us know what kind of effects or processing were applied in camera or otherwise.


:lol: :lol: :lol:

veato wrote:
Left to Rot (would have been 1st but I cant help but think it looks processed)


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Absaloutly hilarious how some people thought it was post processed :) I was at a rally stage and went for a pee behind a hill only to find that hidden vintage gem, the picture was photographed in JPEG and no processing was done exept converted to sepia, The only "special effects" in the pic is the shiny texture of the car due to downpour of rain, I see it as compliment that people thought it was edited so thanks ;)
Author:  timark_uk [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Old ***RESULTS***
brataccas wrote:
the picture was photographed in JPEG
Why?
I'm not questioning anything about the image itself, I'd just like to know why you had your camera set to capture in JPEG mode.

Mark
Author:  belchingmatt [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Old ***RESULTS***
timark_uk wrote:
brataccas wrote:
the picture was photographed in JPEG
Why?
I'm not questioning anything about the image itself, I'd just like to know why you had your camera set to capture in JPEG mode.

Mark


As it was at a Rally perhaps the ability to take more pictures before the buffer was filled.
Author:  Spreadie [ Wed Feb 10, 2010 1:02 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Old ***RESULTS***
brataccas wrote:
... a bunch of stuff, in a semi-rant, because he assumed that we assumed he was cheating.

brataccas wrote:
spreadie wrote:
1) Left to rot - I'm not getting into any debate about processing, I just think it looks incredible.

spreadie also wrote:
Damn, that looks good - Perhaps I won't bother with an entry this month...

So, perhaps some people actually liked the image (it did get 12 pts in the voting round). :roll:

Just a simple "no post-processing, just converted the image to sepia" would work just as well as, if not better than, an effort to mock your supposed doubters. ;)

I remember posts complimenting your eye for a good photo, we're not out to get you, honest. :D

Chillax, a wee bit.
Author:  brataccas [ Wed Feb 10, 2010 1:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Old ***RESULTS***
Spreadie wrote:
brataccas wrote:
... a bunch of stuff, in a semi-rant, because he assumed that we assumed he was cheating.

brataccas wrote:
spreadie wrote:
1) Left to rot - I'm not getting into any debate about processing, I just think it looks incredible.

spreadie also wrote:
Damn, that looks good - Perhaps I won't bother with an entry this month...

So, perhaps some people actually liked the image (it did get 12 pts in the voting round). :roll:

Just a simple "no post-processing, just converted the image to sepia" would work just as well as, if not better than, an effort to mock your supposed doubters. ;)

I remember posts complimenting your eye for a good photo, we're not out to get you, honest. :D

Chillax, a wee bit.


you have misinterpreted me a bit I think ;) im quite pleased/flattered that people thought it was processed :P i wasn't ranting atall :)
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/