Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Clear(er) Skies? 
Author Message
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:35 pm
Posts: 1657
Location: Ipswich
Reply with quote
A friend commented on the clear skies over the weekend being improved by the lack of planes in the sky, I just laughed it off but has he got a point -

A recent research conducted by UK's Met Office has pointed out that vapour trails by jet aircraft can cause cloud formation, capable of blocking sunshine for over 20,000 square miles in Britain.

According to a report in the Telegraph, analysis of contrails from one large military aircraft circling over the North Sea showed the creation of a thin layer of cloud that, at its peak, covered an area of more than 20,000 square miles.

The Met Office research suggested that the collective impact of hundreds of vapour trails can cause a blanket of thin cloud, reducing sunshine for millions who live under busy flight paths.

Contrails, which are clouds of condensed water vapour and soot particles made by the exhaust of jet engines, sometimes disperse within minutes, but can also be present in the sky for many hours.

They can also act as a catalyst for the formation of further wispy cirrus cloud.

Globally, vapour trails are thought to cut sunshine levels by less than one per cent, but this figure could rise to 10 per cent in areas under busy air corridors, such as the south-east of England.

The Met Office analysis was based on observations of a single military Awacs aircraft circling over the North Sea on a sunny day earlier this year.

Researchers had expected high-level winds to disperse its contrails, but instead, they appeared to attract more clouds that continued to grow as they were blown southwards until eventually they formed a hazy high-level blanket of cirrus cloud across southeast England.

According to Jim Haywood, the Met Office's aerosol research manager who led the new study, "At its peak the resulting cirrus cloud covered an area of more than 20,000 square miles."

"Such clouds are normally short-lived but, depending on atmospheric conditions, they can last much longer," he added.

It is thought that low temperatures at high altitudes can cause ice crystals in the vapour to act as 'nuclei' for condensation of more water, resulting in more cloud.

Haywood said that aviation-induced cirrus clouds had both a cooling effect, because of sunlight reflected back into space, and a warming effect, because of trapped heat.

"Studies show that, overall, the warming effect is stronger so aviation-induced clouds are helping to warm the planet," he said

Source-ANI
SAV

_________________
www.youtube.com/hyperviper34


Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:59 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
It was the same after September 11th. After the grounded flights, the weather changed dramatically. Warmer during the day, cooler at night.

Of course, this time we have the ash cloud... But over the weekend, we had lovely clear skies, good weather, warm and sunny, although nights were near freezing.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:48 am
Profile ICQ
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 12:18 pm
Posts: 289
Reply with quote
I live on the gatwick flight path and so have really noticed the drop in noise .. it's so refreshing not to have to stop a conversation every few minutes.

However as i work for an export company, business has been hit as we can't get goods in or out .. it would certainly destroy the business if this was a long term issue.

So, in light of this yin-yang effect, i would like to propose flights over the uk monday to friday, 8am to 6pm, then they stop.

That way my business doesn't suffer and i can still have my nice relaxed evenings and weekends in the garden.

I realise this may not be convenient for those in differing time zones but it would certainly suit me.

Didge

_________________
eurotech


Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:36 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
didgeman wrote:
I live on the gatwick flight path and so have really noticed the drop in noise .. it's so refreshing not to have to stop a conversation every few minutes.

However as i work for an export company, business has been hit as we can't get goods in or out .. it would certainly destroy the business if this was a long term issue.

So, in light of this yin-yang effect, i would like to propose flights over the uk monday to friday, 8am to 6pm, then they stop.

That way my business doesn't suffer and i can still have my nice relaxed evenings and weekends in the garden.

I realise this may not be convenient for those in differing time zones but it would certainly suit me.

Didge

I like that. Air transport should be taxed more because of the global warming effects. Combined they could give you quieter weekends. the only problem is that people invariably be leaving on their holidays on a Saturday and return the following week/s on a Sunday, so they can maximise their time away.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:54 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
I like that. Air transport should be taxed more because of the global warming effects. Combined they could give you quieter weekends. the only problem is that people invariably be leaving on their holidays on a Saturday and return the following week/s on a Sunday, so they can maximise their time away.


When APD in the UK goes up in November it will almost be cheaper to fly to Holland and connect to a long haul flight from there than fly from the UK to the same destination. I don't think that two flights rather than one will be better for the environment.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Wed Apr 21, 2010 9:18 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
It does depend on how the how taxes are applied. It should be Europe wide. The airlines should pay a fuel duty rather than passengers paying duty which does not affect freight or private planes currently.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Apr 21, 2010 10:10 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 6 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.