Author |
Message |
Santacruz
Has a life
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:00 am Posts: 53
|
ok my headphones have finally packed in and im looking to buy some new ones, but the only problem is im not sure which route to take; In-ear or ear-cup headphones, tho im set on in-ear ones atm unless i can justify otherwise. i have been using In-ear headphones for years now and they do just fine, nice sound quality, portable etc but im using them more for on the pc nowadays so portability isnt really an issue, my main reason for wanting to go to ear-cup style ones is the draw (of supposedly) better audio quality, higher treble and deeper bass, the frequency response details seem to show so.. but does this effect to real world performance? so my main question is; Do the ear-cup ones really offer a much better sound quality over in ears and how much better?, and secondly recommendations (even tho i am quite sony biased) heres what i was using last, thanks for your help =) http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sony-MDR-EX71SLB-Fontopia-Headphones-Black/dp/B00008XYJL
|
Sat May 01, 2010 4:17 am |
|
 |
l3v1ck
What's a life?
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am Posts: 12700 Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
|
A good pair of Shure earbuds is my recommendation. The sound quality is brilliant. I got a pair of SE310's for under £120 last year. There are cheaper models available if you want.
|
Sat May 01, 2010 7:31 am |
|
 |
jonlumb
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:44 pm Posts: 4141 Location: Exeter
|

First off, over ear headphones come in two categories, open back and closed back. The first leak sound (in my case, an awful lot), but they sound a lot better at the same price bracket, because they aren't an enclosed structure. As such, unless you need to keep everything really quiet, I would suggest open backed, you'll get more for your money (or in ear). Secondly, different headphone manufacturers produce headphones with very different sounds. I should stress that all of this is my opinion based on a sample of each of the manufacturers (and trying to describe sounds is really rather hard)! Sennheiser tend to be more punchy than say AKG or Beyer. Beyerdynamic have a slightly richer tone, but aren't quite so "in your face" with their sound. Bose are really good with simple stuff that only occupies a relatively small section of the frequency range (single instrument etc.) at a time, but get completely lost when playing say a full band. Unless you have very narrow music tastes that just happen to suit, you'll find better than Bose at the money. I'm personally not a fan of AKG, I find them a bit too sterile, but I know people that like them. I personally own these: Sennheiser HD555s at £75I've also listened to these that a friend of mine has: Beyerdynamic DT880 at £275Both are surprisingly good driven off something like an iPod, even though their stats would naturally suggest otherwise. If I had the money, I'd certainly be looking at the Beyers, but as my HD555s have been running solidly for around 5 years now, it's very hard to justify, I tend to avoid in-ear headphones, not because of sound but more because they are often so delicate, and I've found them surprisingly easy to drop in a drink or just lean something on. I've had a number of the cheaper Sennheiser pairs, mostly for using in the gym, and they've all lasted 3 months tops. If I was spending good money on headphones, I wouldn't want something that fragile.
_________________ "The woman is a riddle inside a mystery wrapped in an enigma I've had sex with."
|
Sat May 01, 2010 8:53 am |
|
 |
timark_uk
Moderator
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm Posts: 12143 Location: Belfast
|
I have a pair of noise-cancelling, in-ear Shure E2c cans for use with miPod. Mark
|
Sat May 01, 2010 8:57 am |
|
 |
Santacruz
Has a life
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:00 am Posts: 53
|
i know Shure headphones are pretty good but there pricy a bit xD, as for open backs im going to stray away from them because i need minimum noise leakage for late night gaming ideally im looking at £50 and below because i really cant afford to blow out on headphones =( usually u get what you pay for, but im hoping that i can find a pair that offer fantastic quality for a low price after a bit a of looking tho im pretty settled on these, mainly because i found a review of a guy whos was using the same headphones i was and wanted the same i did from a new pair, and there not wallet breaking either, if only i could afford the EX700's lol http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sony-MDR-EX500L ... 341&sr=1-1
Last edited by Santacruz on Sat May 01, 2010 7:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Sat May 01, 2010 7:03 pm |
|
 |
finlay666
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm Posts: 4876 Location: Newcastle
|
_________________TwitterCharlie Brooker: Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.
|
Sat May 01, 2010 7:29 pm |
|
 |
Santacruz
Has a life
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:00 am Posts: 53
|
only thing that bugs me there is the statistics Frequency response: 12 -19000 Hz on the Sony MDR-EX500 Frequency response: 5Hz - 25kHz im looking for deep sub bass and clean highs
|
Sat May 01, 2010 7:41 pm |
|
 |
Alexgadgetman
Occasionally has a life
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 4:56 pm Posts: 306
|
I also have the HD555's, they some nice headphones  Also use Klipsch Image S4i out and about. I believe the £60 S4 version is pretty similar, just without so much compatibility. Dont know what for under £50 now though..
|
Sat May 01, 2010 8:36 pm |
|
 |
jonlumb
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:44 pm Posts: 4141 Location: Exeter
|
 |  |  |  | Santacruz wrote: only thing that bugs me there is the statistics Frequency response: 12 -19000 Hz on the Sony MDR-EX500 Frequency response: 5Hz - 25kHz im looking for deep sub bass and clean highs |  |  |  |  |
Do bear in mind that if you are older than about 18 your ears simply won't register anything above 19KHz, and the difference between 5 and 12 Hz is irrelevant. Secondly, any kind of stats are irrelevant, it's how they actually sound that's important.
_________________ "The woman is a riddle inside a mystery wrapped in an enigma I've had sex with."
|
Sat May 01, 2010 9:08 pm |
|
 |
Santacruz
Has a life
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:00 am Posts: 53
|
good point
well it seems like a cut between the Sennheiser HD 212 Pro and the Sony MDR-EX500
|
Sat May 01, 2010 11:06 pm |
|
 |
finlay666
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm Posts: 4876 Location: Newcastle
|
You simply won't get as much bass from in ear compared to proper full cups http://www.play.com/Electronics/Electro ... type=genrehttp://www.play.com/Electronics/Electro ... type=genreCouple of others to think about, guy I used to work with who was a bit of n audiophile had those sennheisers
_________________TwitterCharlie Brooker: Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.
|
Sun May 02, 2010 11:34 am |
|
 |
pcernie
Legend
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm Posts: 45931 Location: Belfast
|
Only ever used the cheap in-ear Sennheisers myself, but even those were above and beyond their equivalent Phillips and Panasonics 
_________________Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/
|
Sun May 02, 2010 11:47 am |
|
 |
Santacruz
Has a life
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:00 am Posts: 53
|
ok gonna do a quick think over with all these items and il get back to ya on what happens =p
thanks everyone
|
Sun May 02, 2010 12:07 pm |
|
|