Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
File sharing, a bad thing? 
Author Message
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:57 am
Posts: 1652
Reply with quote
It seems that files sharers are the cause of mobile phones losing their ability to have unlimited access to the the internet.

Quote:
O2 says that 0.1% of its smartphone users - that's about 2,000 people - are consuming 36% of its data. Other networks indicate the same.


Taken from here

So file sharers have screwed everyone else over by breaking their terms and conditions.

I used to think file sharing had a valid place in the world. Now I am less sure.

:|

_________________
A Mac user Image


Sun Jun 13, 2010 12:19 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
File-sharing mentioned in the article title but not in the article itself.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sun Jun 13, 2010 12:32 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Reading the article, it seems all the networks stopped offering 'unlimited' services at pretty much the same time ie they had seen that one of their number had gotten away with it. And according to The Guardian at least, this was partly because Apple didn't wanna be associated with any backlash over the definition...

I suspect file-sharers, even the notion of them, are nothing but a smokescreen for something the networks had intended to do anyway, rather than invest in what they're offering.

All this seems familiar... Oh, that's right, the ISPs tried it as well! Then they started offering 40-50 Mbps for, er, remind me again? :roll:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Jun 13, 2010 12:41 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
ChurchCat wrote:
It seems that files sharers are the cause of mobile phones losing their ability to have unlimited access to the the internet.

Quote:
O2 says that 0.1% of its smartphone users - that's about 2,000 people - are consuming 36% of its data. Other networks indicate the same.


Taken from here

So file sharers have screwed everyone else over by breaking their terms and conditions.

I used to think file sharing had a valid place in the world. Now I am less sure.

:|

Oh come on CC dont be so naive, file sharing has nothing to do with the removal of the truly unlimited data access. O2s terms and conditions have always had "fair use" in there definitions and could/can easily limit those 0.1% but no they want to limit everyone. Why.. simple revenue they can now charge more money.

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:36 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
One of the biggest users of mobile bandwidth is Google Maps. You can use hundreds of megabytes if you use it for navigating, and quite a few people I know do just that.

Next comes streaming media. It's becoming more popular to stream media from your home computer to your mobile device, and it is a ravenous consumer of data. I know KW does this on his iPhone, and I imagine it's not just him.

I can't imagine there are many people who use file sharing networks through a mobile connection. Does anyone here? I certainly don't :?

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:59 pm
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:57 am
Posts: 1652
Reply with quote
But 0.1% using 36% of data is a bit damming is it not?

_________________
A Mac user Image


Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:15 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
You'll find figures like that in many areas. No big deal really.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:19 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:43 am
Posts: 270
Location: Deepest darkest Wales
Reply with quote
I have an Android phone, so effectively powered by Google. This means I use the Google Navigation map from time to time. Of course I'm going to go over the new 500Mb maximum (funny to have a maximum data limit on an unlimited contract, eh?) from time to time. Happily, I signed the contract before they changed it. ;-)


Sun Jun 13, 2010 11:19 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:12 pm
Posts: 2020
Location: Mute City
Reply with quote
ChurchCat wrote:
But 0.1% using 36% of data is a bit damming is it not?


what information are we given about those statistics? youll probably find that they include non-internet users in the totals, and that most people will only use their phones for checking facebook, emails, ebay whatever, so to be in that 0.1% probably only requires you to visit a few youtube videos per day or something.


Mon Jun 14, 2010 1:15 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:57 am
Posts: 1652
Reply with quote
soddit112 wrote:
ChurchCat wrote:
But 0.1% using 36% of data is a bit damming is it not?


what information are we given about those statistics? youll probably find that they include non-internet users in the totals, and that most people will only use their phones for checking facebook, emails, ebay whatever, so to be in that 0.1% probably only requires you to visit a few youtube videos per day or something.



Well also from the linked to article

Quote:
those 0.1% who are annoying O2 so much consume more than 690MB of data per month. That's about 23MB per day - roughly a megabyte every single hour. What, you think, are those folks doing?

_________________
A Mac user Image


Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:52 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
23MB is about 4 minutes of Youtube.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:58 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:12 pm
Posts: 2020
Location: Mute City
Reply with quote
ChurchCat wrote:
soddit112 wrote:
ChurchCat wrote:
But 0.1% using 36% of data is a bit damming is it not?


what information are we given about those statistics? youll probably find that they include non-internet users in the totals, and that most people will only use their phones for checking facebook, emails, ebay whatever, so to be in that 0.1% probably only requires you to visit a few youtube videos per day or something.



Well also from the linked to article

Quote:
those 0.1% who are annoying O2 so much consume more than 690MB of data per month. That's about 23MB per day - roughly a megabyte every single hour. What, you think, are those folks doing?


is that figure of 690MB per month for the whole 0.1%? or for an individual within that 0.1%?

The Article wrote:
O2 says that 0.1% of its smartphone users - that's about 2,000 people


if it refers to the former, it is a tiny volume of traffic. especially given JJW's figure of 23MB = 4 minutes of Youtube. the article is rather vague about exactly what the data encompasses, so its probably trying to mislead readers and make a mountain out of a molehill.

even if it is the latter, and the article is just badly worded, its still nothing to complain about. :?


Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:33 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 4876
Location: Newcastle
Reply with quote
ChurchCat wrote:
Well also from the linked to article

Quote:
those 0.1% who are annoying O2 so much consume more than 690MB of data per month. That's about 23MB per day - roughly a megabyte every single hour. What, you think, are those folks doing?


Push email on a busy account with a lot of email, app stores (I know some ipod games i have bought such as final fantasy are pushing 100mb!), youtube, spotify, sat nav software]

It's easy to use a lot, just wish my phone would tell me how much I use!

_________________
Twitter
Charlie Brooker:
Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.


Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:56 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:19 pm
Posts: 101
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
Next comes streaming media. It's becoming more popular to stream media from your home computer to your mobile device, and it is a ravenous consumer of data. I know KW does this on his iPhone, and I imagine it's not just him

Actually that makes me a very bad man. :twisted:

I've just had a look (for the first time) at the terms and conditions for my "unlimited" O2 web bolt on:

O2 wrote:
The O2 Web & Wi-Fi Bolt On allows you unlimited use of O2 UK's Edge, GPRS, 3G and HSDPA networks, The Cloud's UK Wireless LAN network and the BT Openzone UK Wireless LAN network, for personal internet use and email. All usage must be for your private, personal and non-commercial purposes. You may not use your SIM Card in any device to allow the continuous streaming of any audio / video content, enable P2P or file sharing or use them in such a way that adversely impacts the service to other O2 customers.


Looking at my data usage since I last reset it at the beginning of November, I've sent 171MB and received 3.3GB - which is very close to their new iPhone 4 500MB a month limit.


Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:36 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
It's interesting that it specifically bars "continuous streaming of any audio / video". I wonder what "continuous" means? I mean I know what it means, but in this case it is meaningless. The very definition of a stream is a continuous flow. Perhaps they mean "unlimited internet for no more than a few seconds per day", thus outlawing any meaningful use of your iPhone for on-line media including Youtube and the BBC, or indeed video messaging be that via Skype or hotcamgirls.grr

At least you're not torrenting. I'm not sure exactly how many MB I've downloaded in the last few days alone, but it's over 9000. Obviously not on my mobile. That would be ridiculous.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:05 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.