
http://multiplayerblog.mtv.com/2010/07/ ... es-update/
FYI for any owners or those considering it...
I kinda wish they'd told them to f off, but I guess they had no choice
Moderators: timark_uk, HeatherKay, Blue_Nowhere, saspro, l3v1ck



jonbwfc wrote:Hmm.. I'd definitely have thought that fell under 'fair use', being defined as parody. Ah well.


jonbwfc wrote:Hmm.. I'd definitely have thought that fell under 'fair use', being defined as parody. Ah well.

l3v1ck wrote:Why? Paparazzi make money from selling peoples images without permission all the time. [/Devil's Advocate]

l3v1ck wrote:Why? Paparazzi make money from selling peoples images without permission all the time. [/Devil's Advocate]
Users browsing this forum: jonbwfc, Linux_User, oceanicitl and 2 guests