Author |
Message |
MrStevenRogers
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:44 pm Posts: 4860
|
Safari 5.0.5 update is available along with a system security update ...
_________________ Hope this helps . . . Steve ...
Nothing known travels faster than light, except bad news ... HP Pavilion 24" AiO. Ryzen7u. 32GB/1TB M2. Windows 11 Home ...
|
Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:43 pm |
|
 |
forquare1
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm Posts: 5150 Location: /dev/tty0
|
Also an Xcode update for those that use it. Curiously it was telling me I couldn't install the update as I had used a different account to purchase it, even though I only have one Apple account...
|
Fri Apr 15, 2011 6:36 am |
|
 |
Fogmeister
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:35 pm Posts: 6580 Location: Getting there
|
What's in the XCode update?
|
Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:40 am |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|
According to the download page... - Updated to support iOS 4.3.2 - Fixed a bug in the iOS Simulator when running OpenGL ES apps - Fixed a bug handling some Core Data mapping models - Fixed a bug in LLVM compiler 2.0 that could cause apps to crash on iOS devices - Additional bug fixes and stability improvements 4GB download just for that lot 
|
Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:12 am |
|
 |
EddArmitage
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm Posts: 5288 Location: ln -s /London ~
|
If you have the app store version does it just download a patch, or does that also require a full download?
|
Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:37 am |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|
I've got the app store version and that was the 4GB download... Jon
|
Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:01 pm |
|
 |
forquare1
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm Posts: 5150 Location: /dev/tty0
|
I would have thought it would be a patch, but that doesn't seem to be how the App Store works...
|
Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:39 pm |
|
 |
smithsocksimon
Occasionally has a life
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:34 pm Posts: 108 Location: Belgium
|
Apple never patches apps, it always replaces the whole package.
In fact it never really patches anything — even OS X updates are a bundle of complete files.
_________________I’m on the internet — blog | flickr | facebook | twitter
|
Fri Apr 15, 2011 3:45 pm |
|
 |
Amnesia10
Legend
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am Posts: 29240 Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
|
It does make sense though. They can ensure that everything works together.
_________________Do concentrate, 007... "You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds." https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTkhttp://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21
|
Fri Apr 15, 2011 3:54 pm |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|
Well, there is a difference between that and what they do with Xcode, which would be the equivalent of giving you a whole new copy of Mac OS X every time! They do really need to figure out some sort of update management with this thing. I appreciate you'll still end up with a lot of files being updated (dev environments, can't really not) but there's no way the update touches every single file in the whole system. Jon
|
Fri Apr 15, 2011 6:02 pm |
|
 |
EddArmitage
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm Posts: 5288 Location: ln -s /London ~
|
But surely you can ensure everything works together as much if you supply the patch (ie. the diff between the installed version and the current version)?
|
Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:22 pm |
|
 |
forquare1
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm Posts: 5150 Location: /dev/tty0
|
Lets not forget that Apple sometimes don't think about the most space efficient way of doing things. IIRC when Time Machine was launched, any changed files would be re-backed up, it didn't just back up the changes, this made backing up virtual machine disks really cumbersome.
|
Fri Apr 15, 2011 10:16 pm |
|
 |
Amnesia10
Legend
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am Posts: 29240 Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
|
Yes but what if people do not install everything there could then be problems if the update it is using is not the correct one.
_________________Do concentrate, 007... "You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds." https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTkhttp://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21
|
Fri Apr 15, 2011 10:42 pm |
|
 |
EddArmitage
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm Posts: 5288 Location: ln -s /London ~
|
Well if the new version is X.3, say, with X.2 being the current version, any user who has X.1 has the X.2 upgrade applied first, and the X.3 upgrade applied on top of that. The App Store knows what versions are installed, so this should be trivial. A more efficient solution would be to diff the diffs first, which is the standard way of doing such things in most VCSs, so files/lines/blobs that are updated by both X.2 and X.3 only have the changes applied from X.3 plus the changes from X.2 that aren't replaced by X.3.
|
Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:29 am |
|
|