x404.co.uk
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/

16 things we'd change about Ubuntu
http://www.x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=13538
Page 1 of 1

Author:  pcernie [ Mon May 02, 2011 8:31 pm ]
Post subject:  16 things we'd change about Ubuntu

http://www.techradar.com/news/software/ ... ntu-945990

I didn't have the patience to get it to try and play nice with my Wi-Fi two years ago :( , otherwise it seemed pretty good, if a little hard to find your way around as a n0ob...

Author:  mikepgood [ Mon May 02, 2011 8:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 16 things we'd change about Ubuntu

New version OK, still not sure about thedesktop change, will probably change back when I have time to figure out .

I am tending to agree that twice a year is becoming a bit frequent for major releases

Author:  big_D [ Tue May 03, 2011 4:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 16 things we'd change about Ubuntu

The reviews I've read all say that Unity is interesting, but still too beta for release in a stable product, so people using Ubuntu in production environments should stick with the previous version and wait for Unity to become stable.

Quote:
This was doing the rounds recently: "What many people don't understand about Linux development is that it's truly a team effort: Red Hat develops the kernel, Novell develops the applications, Debian does the packaging and Ubuntu takes the credit!"

A bit unfair, Canonical does invest a lot in development, and SUSE has or had a big team which worked on the Kernel as well, a great bunch of guys as I worked closely with them on 10.0 and 10.1.

Quote:
Set up a home partition

+1 for that, SUSE has offered that since 2003, although I think the last version didn't offer it.

Quote:
The six-monthly release cycle, set for release by the last day of April and October each year, is a hindrance. Sure it builds anticipation, but it also forces developers to release code before it's ready

I sort of agree. They should aim for 6 monthly release, but if there are show stopper bugs, they should feel free to delay it a few weeks, until they are solved. It seems to work for SUSE, they aim for a 6 monthly cycle, but are man enough to say when it isn't ripe and that they will hold the release back a few days.

They learnt their lesson with 10.0, although the latest release seems to have also escaped a bit early... :?

Quote:
The switch from Rhythmbox to Banshee may be a good one, but the insistence that 75% of the revenues that come from any Amazon MP3 downloads go to Ubuntu instead of the Gnome Foundation is scandalous. After all, where would Ubuntu be without Gnome?

That is a disgrace. As they are not using Gnome, I can understand them wanting to keep some of the revenue, but as the app is developed as part of Gnome, the money should go to Gnome and Canonical should get money back based on their input to the Banshee code base.

Quote:
This is a grey area, but people will try to play a DVD and complain that "Linux is broken" when it can't be done. Including libdvdcss in the Ubuntu repositories isn't an option, but searching out and adding repositories such as Medibuntu is a chore - worse if you don't know about them.

If Ubuntu offered to install third-party repositories during installation, by downloading a setup package from elsewhere, users would be able to play their media without hassle.

This is a legal issue and they can't do it. It is illegal to use libdvdcss or include a way to automatically add the repository. Having a short description of the legal issue and a link to the repository on the FAQ would probably solve the issue. But XP users (and Vista Basic / Business) users will be familiar with this issue anyway, as only the Media Center version of XP, Vista Home were able to play DVDs out of the box - all Windows 7 versions, apart from Starter, can play videos, but that is a big step forward from Microsoft.

That said, most XP users probably got some DVD software bundled with the DVD drive in their PC.

Quote:
I know developers like experimenting with cool new features, but the minor niggles continue to annoy long after the wow (or WTF) reaction to the new stuff. Eye candy may attract new users, but reliability and usability keeps them.

Agreed, plus we use Linux mainly on virtual machines, or aging hardware with on-board Intel graphics from the last century, so no 3D or acceleration is available, which means that Gnome 3 and Unity pretty much don't work.

Author:  MrStevenRogers [ Tue May 03, 2011 6:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 16 things we'd change about Ubuntu

i always do a custom install
root/swap on one hdd/partition and home on a separate hdd/partition

this way i can wipe root/swap and keep/mount home on any upgrades or change of OS ...

Author:  pcernie [ Sat May 07, 2011 1:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 16 things we'd change about Ubuntu

Ubuntu Unity: the great divider

http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2011/05/03 ... t-divider/

Author:  Tsar [ Sat May 07, 2011 2:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 16 things we'd change about Ubuntu

[quote="pcernie"]Ubuntu Unity: the great divider

Well takes a little to get use too

BUT

I love it

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/