Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Compare and contrast... 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
iPad camera connection kit
Galaxy Tab Connection kit

:lol:


Sat Jan 07, 2012 10:47 am
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:23 pm
Posts: 710
Reply with quote
One's white, the other's black.

Both a bit of a rip-off?

_________________
No Apples were used in the making of this post.


Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:01 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
Why would you? Given the average RAW file is over 20MB in size and no apps can open them or work with them... You quickly fill up your tablet with images you can't view or edit. Buying an extra couple of cards would be cheaper, if you need more storage on the move.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Sun Jan 08, 2012 8:55 am
Profile ICQ
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
no apps can open them or work with them...
Sorry Dave, you're wrong. Filterstorm works perfectly well at opening and editing RAW files on the iPad. And if you want something that'll then seamlessly transfer the RAW images to your Lightroom catalogue you can use the Photosmith app.
I don't know about Android based tablets but this works perfectly well on the iPad, I know because I've used them both.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:09 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
Ah, okay. I'd only heard about things like Adobe Photoshop for tablets, which doesn't support RAW.

Personally, I'd still rather have a couple of extra memory cards with me.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:33 pm
Profile ICQ
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 2:01 pm
Posts: 234
Location: West London
Reply with quote
And not everyone shoots RAW of course. Last time I used mine was to pull SD cards together from a few people at a wedding so a selection of pictures could be passed around at the reception. Worked well.


Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:48 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
I'm trying to get another iPad for the studio at work - with an EyeFi card, you can set up a wifi network for the iPad to sign into, and thereby you can share what you shoot, as you shoot.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Sun Jan 08, 2012 4:30 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
Why would you? Given the average RAW file is over 20MB in size and no apps can open them or work with them... You quickly fill up your tablet with images you can't view or edit. Buying an extra couple of cards would be cheaper, if you need more storage on the move.

A 64GB tablet (like my iPad, for example) that has say 40GB free after you've put some music and apps and what have you on it can store just over 3,200 20MB files. And my iPad can view the RAW files from my Sony DSLR in it's inbuilt image app quite happily, which means any other app which uses the standard iOS libraries can load them too. And you can't view pictures on a compact flash card. And I'd rather look at them on a 10" tablet screen than the 2" screen on the back of my camera.

Yes, it's a very expensive storage device. But then, it's not just a storage device, is it? But other than that, yeah.

Jon


Sun Jan 08, 2012 5:26 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
And you can't view pictures on a compact flash card.
You can.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sun Jan 08, 2012 5:42 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
jonbwfc wrote:
And you can't view pictures on a compact flash card.
You can.

Mark

No, you can't view pictures on a compact... oh god. It is a bit ambiguous isn't it :) ?

OK, what I mean is one advantage of a tablet over having more cards is that having the images on a tablet allows you to review and possibly process them (to a degree) 'in the field', whereas just having more CF cards while cheaper allows you merely to capture more images, meaning you can't review any of them until you get back to where your PC is, beyond what you can see on the camera's own screen. And we all know they're not really up to much.

Jon


Sun Jan 08, 2012 8:45 pm
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
Nobody is going to be processing images in the field. Most will wait until they get back to their calibrated screens to do anything sensitive.

Reviewing images on a tablet is fine. Basic post-processing is fine, if that's what you want. I guess photo-journalists will be happier than lugging a lappy about with them, so they can do some basic post work before firing it off to their picture desks.

:mrgreen:

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:24 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
Would Eye-Fi card not also work? Probably a better solution, because you are not limited to one device, any Wi-Fi connected device can receive the images and store them - although I suppose you would need some special app for the iPad, as it can't just save the incoming stream to storage and then access then, like other devices.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:34 am
Profile ICQ
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm
Posts: 5150
Location: /dev/tty0
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
Nobody is going to be processing images in the field. Most will wait until they get back to their calibrated screens to do anything sensitive.

Reviewing images on a tablet is fine. Basic post-processing is fine, if that's what you want. I guess photo-journalists will be happier than lugging a lappy about with them, so they can do some basic post work before firing it off to their picture desks.

:mrgreen:


No one professional, but I'm sure a lot of hobby photographers would punt it from the camera to their 3G enabled tablet, do some processing and upload straight to Flickr, or the like...


Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:38 am
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Why all the hate towards processing on the iPad (or other tablet device)?
I think if you'd properly examined the market for photography apps you'd discover there's enough 'pro' editing apps for it for any professional photographer to easily get by with it.
There's even ones that give you accurate colour readouts so you don't need to have the heavy reliance on screen calibration.
I really don't think you all realise the depth and breadth of the photo related apps available for the iPad, because there's a huge amount out there. (8+)

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:46 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
Why all the hate towards processing on the iPad (or other tablet device)?

They're just jealous ;)

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:51 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.